European Scrutiny Committee Contents


19 EU humanitarian assistance

(30326)

16277/08

SEC(08) 2899

Commission Staff Working Document: Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid (ECHO) Operational Strategy 2009

Legal base
Document originated20 November 2008
Deposited in Parliament13 January 2009
DepartmentInternational Development
Basis of considerationEM of 27 January 2009
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (28178) 16551/06: HC 41-vii (2006-07), chapter 2 (24 January 2007) and HC 41-xi (2006-07), chapter 8 (28 February 2007)
To be discussed in CouncilTo be determined
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared, but further information requested

Background

19.1 In its introduction, the Commission says that the EU's humanitarian aid policy reflects its founding principles — "solidarity, tolerance and respect for human dignity." The Commission has "asserted itself as a major player in international humanitarian aid" and is today one of the main donors in operations providing assistance, relief and protection to populations in third countries affected by humanitarian crises.

19.2 DG ECHO (the Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid) is the Commission service responsible for implementing the humanitarian response to emergency situations, complex crises and forgotten crises. Its mandate[61] gives it the task of saving and preserving lives, reducing or preventing suffering and preserving the integrity and dignity of populations in distress. The Commission says that, by fulfilling this mandate, DG ECHO has "always maintained its adherence to the fundamental principles of International Humanitarian Law, namely humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence" and that "its action is based on an objective evaluation of needs."

19.3 In the current geopolitical context, the Commission sees the major challenges as:

—   protecting a threatened humanitarian space and promoting adherence to International Humanitarian Law by all the parties involved in an armed conflict; and

—  ensuring the coordination of a growing number of humanitarian actors in order to bring effective and appropriate aid to those in need.

19.4 In 2004 nearly $5 billion, over 10% of official development assistance, was spent on emergency relief. Donor governments recognised their pivotal role in addressing the challenges of ensuring that this money is used effectively, is available at the right time, is spent on the right kind of assistance, and is targeted according to need: not political affiliation, ethnicity, religion or race. In 2003 a number of donor governments, together with the relevant UN agencies, the Commission, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs agreed a set of 23 principles and good practice, known as the Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) initiative, to work towards achieving efficient and principled humanitarian assistance. 35 donor bodies have now signed up to these principles. [62] The Commission notes that, with a view to promoting the principles and good practices of humanitarian action, DG ECHO has accepted, on behalf of the Commission, the co-chairmanship (with the Netherlands) of the GHD initiative for the year 2008-2009.

19.5 The Commission also sees the signing of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on 18 December 2007, followed by the adoption of the implementation action plan on 29 May 2008, as "a considerable step forward for the European Union which has finally given itself a common set of values, principles and objectives intended to strengthen the coherence of its overall humanitarian action." The Commission notes the importance given in the Consensus and its action plan to "the principle of diversity of the implementing partners — the United Nations, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and non-governmental organisations", and the recognition thereby "that each of these bodies has comparative advantages in the response to specific situations or circumstances."

19.6 The Commission also highlights efforts at strengthening the coordination of the European strategy on humanitarian aid and ensuring its coherence via the establishment of a specific Council working group on Humanitarian and Food Aid, which will meet regularly from 1 January 2009 "as a forum for debating and discussing humanitarian situations and issues."

19.7 The document contains virtually no figures. In broad terms, appropriations for 2008-13 are: [63]
€ millions
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Humanitarian Aid
732
754
777
801
850
875
Emergency Aid Reserve
235
239
244
249
254
264

The Commission Staff Working Document

19.8 The document outlines the Commission's operational strategy for its planned humanitarian assistance activity during financial year 2009. The Commission says there has been a clear increase in the number of natural disasters (a 60% rise n 2000-07 compared with the 1990's) and in their impact on human lives, with the majority becoming increasingly complex and characterised by a lack of structural or political solutions (for example Somalia and Darfur) or happening in difficult operating environments (for example Cyclone Nargis in Burma, where "the military junta in power refused to allow foreign search and rescue teams to access the affected areas"). Climate change, the rise in food and raw material prices, armed conflict and the threats posed by "the continued shrinking of the humanitarian space and the increase in the number of attacks targeting local or expatriate humanitarian aid workers" are also highlighted.

19.9 The document then outlines ECHO's General Programming Principles:

—  Global Needs Assessment (GNA), based on national indicators, which classes more than 140 countries according to the existence of a recent crisis and the degree of vulnerability of the population; and

—  the Forgotten Crisis Assessment (FCA): serious humanitarian crises overlooked by the media and the international donor community in which the populations affected do not receive sufficient international aid.

19.10 Thus the Commission identifies and examines 44 countries or territories in crisis, of which 17 are classed as "extremely vulnerable" (a slight increase on last year of 41 countries in crisis and 15 "extremely vulnerable"); plus a further 6 "forgotten crises" in Algeria, Bangladesh, Burma, Colombia, Kashmir and Yemen.

19.11 The document then notes a number of Horizontal Priorities (implementing the European Consensus Action Plan, co-chairing the GHD Initiative, International Humanitarian Law) and Sectoral and Policies, in particular LRRD (Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development). This concerns the need for "dialogue, if possible from the beginning of a crisis, between humanitarian and development actors to develop a common analysis of the crisis and appropriate responses in the short, medium and long term": this will require "a better link between the various instruments enabling a real transition to be established between humanitarian aid and development."

19.12 The document then outlines ECHO's planned humanitarian food aid spending: this having been increased by €140 million, to €363 million, in 2008 in response to the dramatic increase in food prices, it now appears to have been reduced again to more "normal" levels, at €230 million. ECHO will also continue to help strengthen international agencies' capacity for analysis and evaluation of need, and to contribute to the revision of the Food Aid Convention.

19.13 The Strategy also looks at:

—  Disaster preparedness, highlighting the importance of encouraging and building capacity in via the DIPECHO programmes, both current and prospective;[64] the Commission says that "the orientations planned by DG ECHO are completely in line with the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid[65] as well as with "the draft Communication on the European strategy for disaster risk reduction in developing countries which is planned for adoption during the first quarter of 2009";

—  ECHO's "thematic funding" programme and the Grant Facility, which are used to strengthen the institutional capacity of the UN organisations, the Red Cross movement and NGO's, and which the Commission says were externally, and positively, evaluated in 2008; and

—  Evaluation: As in 2008, and in accordance with the aims of the Consensus, joint evaluations will be conducted with the Member States and other operational partners "in order to improve the cost-effectiveness ratio and coordination"; and "more attention will be paid to the use and dissemination of the results of the evaluations."

The Government's view

19.14 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 27 January 2009, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Department for International Development (Mr Michael Foster) comments as follows:

"The Government supports ECHO's efforts to deal with the growing challenges of climate change and worsening complex emergencies. We value ECHO's innovative and pioneering work on needs assessment through its Global Needs Assessment (GNA) and the Forgotten Crisis Assessment (FCA).

"The Government welcomes DG ECHO's co-chairmanship (with the Netherlands) of the Good Humanitarian Donorship (GHD) initiative. We support ECHO in its efforts to ensure harmonisation wherever possible of the GHD work plan and the EU Consensus on the Humanitarian Aid Action Plan which was adopted on 29 May 2008. We are pressing for implementation of the Consensus Action Plan to be a priority for DG ECHO and Member States in 2009. It will be important for DG ECHO and Member States to absorb and implement the GHD principles and the Consensus commitments in their operational field work.

"The Government welcomes the establishment of the Council Working Group on Humanitarian Aid and Food Aid (COHAFA) in January 2009 as a key forum for taking forward the Consensus Action Plan.

"We support efforts by ECHO to strengthen working with other Commission Departments, as well as the World Bank and UN, on the transition phase between humanitarian and development. We also support the focus on, and increasing financial commitment to, Disaster Risk Reduction and Preparedness activities and plans to develop a new strategy for disaster risk reduction".

19.15 On the Timetable, the Minister says that the operational strategy was discussed at the Informal Humanitarian Aid Committee[66] hosted by the French Presidency in November 2008; that "areas of policy will be discussed in Council Working Group on Humanitarian Aid and Food Aid (COHAFA)"; and that regional and country operational plans will be approved in the HAC.

Conclusion

19.16 Although used to receiving ECHO annual reports on past performance, when we last looked at ECHO's strategy, in 2007, we noted that this seemed to have been the first time that we had received a document that looked ahead and gave some sense of what ECHO saw as the challenges that it faced and how it planned to tackle them. We also noted that, although informed by a methodology and some general principles, it was hard to discern what might properly be termed a strategy in the midst of a great deal of description. The same might be said of this document: there is no indication of how it will be used for what should be one of its main purposes — the yardstick against which to evaluate actual performance in 2009. We accordingly ask that, when the annual report on 2009 is presented for scrutiny, the Minister ensures that his Explanatory Memorandum includes an examination of performance against strategy, unless that is done in the annual report itself.

19.17 We also hope that one of the areas of policy that will be discussed in new Council Working Group on Humanitarian Aid and Food Aid will be how to improve this document, so that it is less descriptive and more of a genuine, user-friendly strategy document, and is thus more easily usable as a tool for measuring the key variables that both the Commission and he highlight. We look to him to ensure that next year's Explanatory Memorandum comments on progress in this area.

19.18 We also ask that it is somewhat more informative than this one: we do not think that 195 words is an adequate summary of a document of this size and importance.

19.19 We ask, furthermore, that he ensures that further such Operational Strategy documents are deposited, since the one for 2008, we are told, was not published in the usual way, did not go onto the official Commission document registry and was thus not given the customary reference number, was therefore not picked up by the Cabinet Office, and no Explanatory Memorandum was commissioned.

19.20 We also look forward to hearing from him about the draft Communication on the European strategy for disaster risk reduction in developing countries.

19.21 In the meantime, we clear the document.





61   Set out in Council Regulation (EC) 1257/96 of 20 June 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) 1882/2003 of 29 September 2003 (OJ No. L 284 of 31.10.03, p 1). Back

62   See http://www.goodhumanitariandonorship.org/ for full information on the Good Humanitarian Donorship initiative. Back

63   Full information on ECHO funding can be found at http://ec.europa.eu/echo/funding/budget_en.htm  Back

64   See http://ec.europa.eu/echo/aid/dipecho_en.htm for full information. Back

65   See http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/1957&format=PDF&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en for the full text.  Back

66   The Member States discuss fundamental humanitarian aid issues once a month in the Humanitarian Aid Committee (HAC), which is both an administrative and a regulating entity. All projects that cost more than €2 million must obtain its approval. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 6 March 2009