European Scrutiny Committee Contents


8 Annual accounts of micro-entities

(30478)

7229/09

+ ADDS 1-2

COM(09) 83

Draft Directive amending Council Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards micro-entities

Legal baseArticle 44(1)EC; co-decision; QMV
Document originated26 February 2009
Deposited in Parliament6 March 2009
DepartmentBusiness, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Basis of considerationEM of 17 March 2009
Previous Committee ReportNone, but see footnote 47
To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

8.1 In 1978, the Council adopted Directive 78/660/EEC (the 4th Company Law Directive) to create a harmonised set of requirements for the external reporting of all limited liability companies, and Council Directive 83/347/EEC (the 7th Company Law Directive) subsequently added a common set of requirements for consolidated financial statements. According to the Commission, these two measures together create the core of the accounting acquis, and, despite a number of further measures, they still form the basis of accounting for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) within the Community. It also says that, although this has led to an improved financial reporting environment, every new piece of legislation has created further requirements, and that, whilst each may have been justified in its own right, it is now important to consider whether less useful requirements should be removed or replaced.

8.2 In particular, it notes that the European Council in March 2007 underlined the importance of reducing administrative burdens in order to boost the European economy, especially bearing in mind the potential benefits for SMEs, and that the recent European Economic Recovery Plan[47] to restore consumer and business confidence pledges to reduce this burden by, among other things, removing the requirement on micro-enterprises to prepare annual accounts.

The current document

8.3 In putting forward this proposal, the Commission notes that Recommendation 2003/361/EC defines micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, but says that consultation with Member States has indicated that the thresholds for micro-enterprises may be too high for accounting purposes. It has therefore proposed the introduction of a new, smaller category of "micro-enterprise", which on their balance sheet do not exceed two of the following limits — a balance sheet total of €500,000, net turnover of €1 million, and/or an average number of employees of 10 persons during the financial year in question. However, a company would lose its micro-entity status if it exceeded two of these three these criteria for two years running, whilst a company declining in size would gain such status if it did not exceed two of the criteria in two consecutive years.

8.4 The proposal would also amend Council Directive 78/660/EEC to exempt such entities from the obligation to publish annual accounts, which the Commission suggests should lead to a reduced administrative burden whilst providing adequate protection and information to stakeholders and aligning the reporting requirements of these entities to the real needs of users. More specifically, it notes that there are about 3.5 million micro-entities within the Community which meet at least two of the relevant criteria, and that it costs each of them €1558 to meet the current reporting obligations: thus, even if about 25% of this sum were still needed to meet managerial and other needs, the Commission estimates that the proposal would be reduced the overall burden by about €6.3 billion.

The Government's view

8.5 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 17 March 2009, the Economic and Business Minister at the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Mr Ian Pearson) says that the Government has supported this proposal since its inception. In particular, it believes that there will be major cost savings for business, of particular importance in current difficult trading times; that the reduction of burdens would also facilitate the process whereby, in a recession, many individuals set up a small business as a response to redundancy; and that, depending up how the Government chooses to implement the Directive, micro-entities would be able to prepare one simple set of accounts serving for tax returns and for shareholder requirements.

8.6 The Minister goes on to address three objections which have been raised to the proposal. First, some accountancy bodies have suggested that SMEs need to prepare accounts for the sake of good financial management, but he says that the Government does not believe that this necessarily entails having to comply with the detailed requirements of national law deriving from the 4th Company Law Directive, which are designed for larger companies with more complex financial transactions. A second objection is that the 4th Company Law Directive would be replaced by 27 varying national laws, with damaging consequences for cross-border business, but the Government believes that micro entities do not tend to engage in cross-border trade. Lastly, it is said that banks might continue to require micro companies to draw up accounts in accordance with the Companies Act provisions deriving from the 4th Company Law Directive, but the Government does not consider this will be the case, believing that banks manage the credit-worthiness of small businesses by monitoring their business bank accounts, and that they will typically also seek personal guarantees or security from Directors for their loans to micro-entities.

8.7 The Minister says that, if the draft Directive becomes law, the options for the UK are to not require micro entities to prepare any accounts for their members; to continue to require accounts from micro entities as for other small companies (a 'do nothing' option); or to devise a simplified form of reporting which lies between the two. He also says that the other issue is what information (if any) on micro-entities needs to be filed with the Registrar of Companies, adding that any change to requirements will have to be consistent with changes introduced by HM Revenue and Customs, which is currently considering plans for the simplification of corporation tax for this size of entity.

8.8 The Minister summarises the situation by pointing out that the impact on business will depend crucially on the final detail of the UK's implementation, but says that the maximum benefit is likely to be £103m-£403m per annum for the entities concerned.

Conclusion

8.9 This proposal gives effect to one of the areas contained in the European Economic Recovery Plan, and, depending upon how it is implemented in the UK, would appear to provide potentially useful savings for the businesses which would be affected by it. Consequently, although we are drawing the document to the attention of the House, we are content to clear it.





47   (30213) 16097/08: see HC 19-i (2008-09), chapter 4 (10 December 2008). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 3 April 2009