Seventh Report of Session 2008-09 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


2 Free movement of workers in the EU

(30210)

16162/08

COM(08) 765

Commission Communication — The impact of free movement of workers in the context of EU enlargement — Report on the transitional arrangements set out in the Accession Treaties of 2003 and 2005

Legal base
Document originated18 November 2008
Deposited in Parliament25 November 2008
DepartmentHome Office
Basis of considerationEM of 26 January 2009
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared: oral evidence requested from Government Ministers

Background

2.1 Article 39 of the EC Treaty establishes the right of EU nationals to move freely to another Member State to take up employment.

2.2 A Treaty of 2003 provided for the accession to the EU of ten countries on 1 May 2004.[4] It also gave the 15 existing Member States discretion to place temporary restrictions on access to their labour markets by workers from the new Member States with the exception of those from Cyprus and Malta. A Treaty of 2005 provided for the accession to the EU of Bulgaria and Romania and included discretion for the 25 existing Member States to place temporary restrictions on the access of Bulgarian and Romanian workers to their labour markets.

2.3 Both Treaties limited the total length of the transitional period to seven years, made up of three phases:

  • Member States could restrict access for an initial two years;
  • Member States could extend their restrictions for up to a further three years; and
  • restrictions should, in principle, cease at the end of the second phase but a Member State might, in the event of actual or potential serious disturbances to its labour market, extend the restrictions until the end of the seven years since accession.

2.4 The Commission's Communication and this report use the following abbreviations:

  • the EU-15 — the 15 Member States which comprised the EU before 1 May 2004;
  • the EU-10 — the new Member States which joined the EU on 1 May 2004;
  • the EU-8 — the Member States which joined in May 2004 and to which the transitional arrangements apply for restricting access to the labour markets of the EU-15 (that is, the EU-10 minus Cyprus and Malta);
  • the EU-25 — the Member States which comprised the EU before 1 January 2007;
  • the EU-2 — Bulgaria and Romania after their accession to the EU on 1 January 2007; and
  • the EU-27 — the current members of the EU.

2.5 Eleven of the EU 15 have opened their labour markets to workers from the EU-8. The remaining four apply various restrictions.

2.6 Ten of the EU-25 have opened their labour markets to workers from the EU-2; and 15 Member States restrict access to workers from those countries.

The document

2.7 The Commission's Communication is intended to provide a basis for the Council of Ministers to review the first two years of the transitional arrangements for workers who are nationals of the EU-2 and a further review of the application of the transitional arrangements to the EU-8. The document provides extensive statistical information about, for example, the nationality of workers who have moved to other Member States, the main countries of destination, and the distribution of mobile workers between economic sectors such as agriculture and construction. For example:

  • Polish nationals comprise about 25% of the EU nationals who have moved to other Member States in the last four years; Romanian nationals account for about 19% of the total; United Kingdom nationals account for 6%; and Bulgarians for about 4%.
  • The UK was the destination of 59% of Polish nationals who were resident in another Member State for four years or less;
  • France was the destination for 39% of the UK nationals who were resident in another Member State for four years or less;
  • in 2003, 900,000 nationals of the EU-10 were resident in the EU-15; the current number is about 2 million;
  • 5% of Ireland's population of working-age comes from the EU-10 — a higher proportion than in any other Member State. In the UK, EU-10 nationals comprise 1.2% of the population of working age;
  • in all but two Member States, the number of recent arrivals from non-EU countries exceeds the number from other Member States (the exceptions are Ireland and Luxembourg); and
  • most of the recent arrivals from the EU-10 have found work in manufacturing, construction, hotels and restaurants, business-related services and private households.

2.8 Commenting on the effect of labour mobility on wages and employment, the Commission says that:

"Practically all available research finds little impact of post-enlargement labour mobility on wages and employment of local workers and no indication of serious labour market imbalances through intra-EU mobility, even in those Member States with the biggest inflows.

"For example, one study finds that wages in the EU-15 are on average only 0.08% lower in the short run than they would have been without additional mobility from the EU-8, with no impact at all in the long run. The short-run impact on unemployment is also found to be marginal, with an estimated increase of the average EU-15 unemployment rate of only 0.04 percentage points in the short run and a neutral effect in the longer run due to the inflow of EU-8 workers and a similar moderate effect concerning EU-2 mobility."[5]

2.9 The Commission's concludes, among other things, that:

  • workers from Bulgaria, Romania and the EU-10 have helped to meet higher demand for labour in the receiving countries and have, therefore, made a significant contribution to sustained economic growth;
  • there are signs that mobility flows from the EU-2 and EU-8 may have peaked and that much of the recent mobility of workers between Member States has been temporary;
  • the volume and direction of mobility flows are driven by the general demand for and supply of labour rather than by restrictions on access to the labour market;
  • restrictions may delay labour market adjustment and increase undeclared work;
  • the overall impact of post-enlargement mobility has been positive; and
  • experience suggests that cross-border mobility tends to decline in times of economic downturn.

The Commission calls on Member States to consider whether they need to continue restricting access to their labour markets by workers from the new Member States.

The Government's view

2.10 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 26 January 2009, the Minister of State at the Home Office (Mr Phil Woolas) tells us that nationals of the countries which joined the EU on 1 May 2004 are currently required to register under the Worker Registration Scheme if they get a job in the UK. The Government has not yet decided whether the requirement should continue after 1 May 2009.

2.11 He says, however, that the Government has decided that the restrictions on access to the UK labour market by Romanian and Bulgarian workers should continue in 2009 but that the quota for the number of workers admitted under the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Scheme should be increased from 16,250 to 21,250 for this year; and that the quota of 3,500 places under the Sector Based Scheme should remain unchanged but may be opened to a wider range of occupations within the sector. The Government will review these arrangements before the end of 2009.

2.12 The Minister says that:

"The Government consulted the Migration and Advisory Committee on the likely labour market impacts of lifting these restrictions. Its principal recommendation was that the existing restrictions should not be lifted given the uncertainty as to how far other Member States will open their labour markets and given the current economic downturn which increases the risk that opening up labour market access may result in the displacement of UK workers. In addition to the MAC's assessment of the labour market position, the Government believes that it remains sensible to continue to take a gradual approach to opening up labour market access for Bulgarians and Romanians in order to avoid undue pressure on public services and social cohesion. While the number of nationals of the Member States that joined the EU in 2004 coming here to work has started to diminish, it is less clear how the current economic downturn will impact on the stock of Accession workers already present in the United Kingdom, both in terms of numbers and in terms of any additional demands they may place on public services and the benefits system." [6]

Conclusion

2.13 In our view, the Commission's Communication contains much useful information and analysis about an issue of major political importance. We are minded, therefore, to recommend the document for debate in European Committee B. First, however, there are some matters on which we believe it would be useful to receive oral evidence from the Minister and from the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Meanwhile, we shall keep the document under scrutiny.





4   Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Back

5   Commission Communication, section 4.3, pages 12-13, first and second paragraphs. Back

6   Minister's Explanatory Memorandum of 26 January 2009, paragraph 16. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 13 February 2009