Documents considered by the Committee on 14 October 2009, including the following recommendations for debate: Security of gas supply, Financial management - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


3  THE I2010 STRATEGY

(30857)
12600/09
+ ADDs 1-3
COM(09) 390
Commission Communication: Europe's Digital Competitiveness Report — Main achievements of the i2010 strategy 2005-2009

Commission Staff Working Papers


Legal base
Document originated4 August 2009
Deposited in Parliament 13 August 2009
DepartmentDepartment for Business, Innovation and Skills
Basis of consideration EM of 28 August 2009
Previous Committee Report None; but see (29638) 8696/08: HC 16-xxiii (2007-08), chapter 13 (4 June 2008)
To be discussed in Council To be determined
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionRetained under scrutiny; further information requested

Background

3.1 The i2010 Strategy was launched in June 2005 as the European Commission's new strategic framework laying out broad policy guidelines for the information society and the media — "a new, integrated policy is to encourage knowledge and innovation with a view to boosting growth and creating more better-quality jobs". It forms part of the revised Lisbon Strategy.

3.2 The Commission sought to coordinate the actions undertaken by Member States to facilitate digital convergence and to respond to the challenges associated with the information society. The Commission proposed three priorities to be achieved by 2010:

—  creating a Single European Information Space, via a regulatory environment that supported innovation and competition, thereby enabling both citizens and businesses to take advantage of the economic benefits arising from the convergence of digitalised technologies;

—  strengthening innovation and investment in information and communications technologies (ICT) research, funded via the 7th R&D Framework Programme and the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme, and including measures such as the Lead Market Initiative; and

—  achieving an inclusive European information and media society, including measures such the Commission's e-Inclusion and Safer Use of the Internet initiatives.[14]

3.3 Commission Communication 8696/08, "Preparing Europe's digital future: i2010 Mid-Term Review", which we considered in June 2008, identified four strategically important issues for competitiveness and ICT take-up in Europe:

—  the need to shift up a gear to lead the transition to next-generation networks[15] whilst ensuring efforts continue to reduce the digital divide within Europe;

—  greater exploitation of Europe's main economic asset — the largest consumer market in the developed world. Despite the ubiquitous presence of the Internet, more needed to be done to create a Single Market for the digital economy;

—  in most Member States expenditure on ICT research was still below target; Member States needed to pool resources by coordinating research and innovation efforts;

—  with the ever increasing use of the Internet in daily life, safeguards for EU citizens which matched developments in technology and the market needed to be introduced, without impinging on the significant opportunities offered by online social and economic activity.

3.4 As the then Minister (Baroness Vadera) noted, although the Communication did not have any direct policy implications for the UK, many of the proposed actions could affect existing programmes and initiatives. She said that the UK would work with the Commission to exchange ideas and shape its recommendations (non binding) on Next Generation Networks, which would feed into work of the then-recently announced Broadband Review.[16] She also supported the Commission's proposals for a more consistent application of the regulatory framework for electronic communications, where negotiations were currently underway in the Council Working Group and the European Parliament. The UK would also play an active part in the Commission's forthcoming proposals on the Universal Services Obligation. The then Minister was "encouraging the UK's private and public sector to participate in the European Commission's innovation and research programmes". The UK had played an important role in developing the Commission's Lead Market Initiative, would continue to work with the Commission and other Member States to develop appropriate action plans for each market and was seeking input directly from UK stakeholders. The UK was also looking to shape the review of the ePrivacy Directive "so as to safeguard the privacy of our citizens whilst not creating barriers that will hinder their access to the vast opportunities that online social and economic activity offers", and would be using the Byron Report[17] as an exemplar of how to approach online protection and as evidence and analysis in the EU policy making process. While there had been no formal consultation on this Communication, UK stakeholders had been give the opportunity to provide comments on its content.

3.5 As well as recalling the general comments it had made in relation to many similar Commission ICT-related documents about the importance of maintaining the basis of success so far — the centrality of the market, the maximum involvement of all stakeholders in the policy process and the maintenance of the Commission's role to one where it is both legally appropriate and adds genuine value — the Committee looked forward to scrutinising any such further proposals and — given the importance of the subject matter — in the meantime cleared the Communication with a Report to the House.[18]

The Commission Communication

3.6 The Communication begins by listing what it regards as the main achievements of i2010 from 2005 to 2010:

—  More and more Europeans are online. The number of regular internet users has increased from 43% in 2005 to 56% in 2008; most of them use the internet almost daily and with high-speed internet access. Europe has become the world leader in broadband internet. With 114 million subscribers;

—  High rates of broadband connectivity have translated into higher usage of advanced services. 80 % of regular internet users engage in increasingly interactive activities;

—  The market for mobile phones has exceeded 100% penetration — increasing from 84% of the EU population in 2004 to 119% in 2009;

—  Europe has made fast progress in the supply and use of the 20 benchmarked online public services. The supply of fully available services to citizens has increased to 50% in 2007 (27% in 2004) and for businesses to 70% (58% in 2004). One third of European citizens and almost 70% of businesses in the EU use of eGovernment services;

—  EU-funded ICT research has played a key role in Europe's major industrial development, such as in micro- and nano-electronics, in healthcare and the EU's road safety agenda;

—  ICT policies have been increasingly mainstreamed. Many Member States now have integrated national ICT strategies with objectives similar to those of the i2010 initiative eg Digital Britain and France Numérique 2012.

3.7 The Communication then looks in more detail at the achievements of i2010 in relations to the three pillars:

—  Pillar 1 — Boost the single market for business and users: the Commission suggests that the following actions have boosted the opening up of EU markets, enhanced regulatory consistency, created a level playing field for Europe's telecom operators industry and consumers and fostered a more consistent approach to spectrum and potential use of the digital dividend:

  • The recent mobile phone Roaming Regulations;
  • Reform of the eCommunications regulatory framework (which is about to enter conciliation with the European Parliament, and if it passes this process, will be adopted under the Swedish Presidency);
  • updated rules for the Audio Visual sector;
  • Commission support for films under the EU MEDIA programme.

—  Pillar 2 — Stimulate Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) research and innovation: The Communication suggests that the following actions have boosted ICT R&D:

  • Europe's largest ever budget for ICT research and Innovation, which amounted to €10bn;
  • The launch of various public/private partnerships, including the Artemis and Eniac initiatives in embedded computing systems, and the Ambient Assisted living initiative which provides ICT solutions for Europe's elderly people;
  • the beginning of work on a public/private partnership that could underpin the future internet offering faster data transfer, more IP addresses etc.

—  Pillar 3 — Ensure that all citizens benefit from Europe's lead in ICT: The Communication suggests that i2010 included innovations that put citizens interests at the core of policy-making and that its actions boosted the well-being of Europe's citizens:

  • various eHealth initiatives under i2010 have improved the health of European citizens and brought productivity benefits to Europe's healthcare systems, e.g., two major initiatives launched in 2008 to facilitate patient access to telemedicine services (delivery of health care services where distance is a critical factor) and to address cross border interoperability of electronic patient record systems.
  • with regards to eGovernment services, the Commission suggests that though 50% of EU Government services are now available online, interoperability is still a challenge. To address these and other issues, in 2006, the Commission and Member States adopted a five year plan which it is hoped will boost take up of eGovernment services;
  • ICT to improve the lives of all EU citizens (eInclusion) has been one of the corner stones of the i2010 project since 2005; initiatives include boosting the rights of the disabled, the elderly and the socially disadvantaged;
  • Quality of Life initiatives include the Ambient Living Initiative, the Intelligent Car Initiative and Europeana, a European funded online library.

IMPACT OF I2010 ON OTHER MEMBER STATES

3.8 The Communication notes that i2010 has been implemented by all Member States through national strategies, with almost all closely following the goals of i2010. Initial strategies focused heavily on making broadband available to all their citizens, whilst the current focus is on higher speed broadband, e.g., Finland's push for 1 Mps as a universal service obligation by 2010 and Portugal's focus on optical fibre.

LOOKING AHEAD

3.9 Finally, the Communication looks at future policy challenges. The Commission suggests that Europe is at risk of losing its competitive edge in the ICT field — for example it lags behind Korea and Japan in high speed broadband using fibre. The Commission accordingly suggests a new digital agenda, to create a world class telecoms infrastructure and unlock the full potential of the Internet for all of the EU citizens. The Commission recalls that the December 2008 European Council called for a European plan for Innovation, where ICT would be a key component, and has now launched an online public consultation on nine key areas that it believes will help form the next digital agenda:

—  Unleashing ICT as a driver of economic recovery and as a lead contributor to the Lisbon growth and jobs agenda;

—  Increasing the role of ICT in the transition to a more sustainable low-carbon economy;

—  Upping Europe's performance in ICT research and innovation;

—  Creating a 100% connected economy through a high-speed and open internet for all;

—  Consolidating the online single market;

—  Promoting users' creativity;

—  Reinforcing the EU's position as a key player in the international ICT arena;

—  Making modern and efficient public services available and accessible to all;

—  Using ICT to improve the quality of life of EU citizens.

3.10 The Communication concludes that i2010 has laid the building blocks for a modern ICT-enabled society, with broadband is now firmly on the political agenda. But it sees Europe as facing "important decisions about how to build a seamlessly connected digital economy poised for recovery", and notes that "over the coming years the internet is expected to become an essential service, crucial for us to participate fully in society." In order to "seize these opportunities, the Commission calls on the Member States and on stakeholders to actively cooperate in the months ahead until early 2010 to draft a new digital agenda so that Europe can emerge from the current crisis with a stronger, more competitive and more open digital economy, driving European growth and innovation."

The Government's view

3.11 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 28 August 2009, the Minister for Further Education, Skills, Apprenticeships and Consumer Affairs (Kevin Brennan) says that the UK "has been totally supportive of the i2010 programme since its inception in 2005 and welcomes this final Communication", and that "it is now widely recognized that ICT has contributed to Europe's economic performance over the past ten years and i2010 has done much to focus EU Governments' minds on this now critical part of any countries economic "armoury"."

3.12 The Minister notes that the UK is working with the Commission and other Member States to shape the successor to the i2010 programme and welcomes the ideas contained in the Communication, which he says will supplement proposals that he expects to see from the Swedish Presidency before the end of September. He further notes that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will consult "stakeholders" and other parts of the Government in drawing up the UK response to the Commission consultation, which "will reflect on [sic] proposals enumerated in the Digital Britain White Paper,[19] such as the importance of broadband as a universal service; the need for investment in enhanced broadband services and encouraging the take up of Digital Audio Broadcast (DAB)".

Conclusion

3.13 Although the Communication contains no legislative proposals, we are reporting it to the House because of the importance of the subject matter. What matters now is the way forward, which we presume will at some stage be set out in a new Commission document.

3.14 Before then, however, we think that the House will be interested in the Government's response to this Communication. We accordingly ask the Minister to provide the Committee with a summary when it is available, and also details of the Swedish Presidency proposals that he anticipates, and his views on how he sees the successor to i2010 developing.

3.15 In the meantime we shall retain the document under scrutiny.



14   For full details, see http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/index_en.htmBack

15   The next-generation network seamlessly blends the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and the public switched data network (PSDN), creating a single multiservice network. Rather than large, centralized, proprietary switch infrastructures, a new network architecture - one that will blend the PSTN and PSDN - is emerging; instead of networks based on large, centralized, expensive mainframes and "dumb" terminals, distributed networks are made up of low-cost, "smart" desktop computers linked together, permitting applications to be pushed closer to the end-user, reducing overall cost while greatly enhancing system flexibility and functionality. For full background, see http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/next_gen/index.htmlBack

16   On 22 February 2008, the then Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform announced a review of the future of broadband internet, which was to be carried out by the former chief executive of telecoms firm Cable & Wireless, Francesco Caio, and which was expected to be completed this autumn.  Back

17   "Safer Children in a Digital World: the report of the Byron Review", carried out by Dr Tanya Byron, and published in March 2008. Back

18   See headnote: (29638) 8696/08: HC 16-xxiii (2007-08), chapter 13 (4 June 2008). Back

19   Available at http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/digitalbritain-finalreport-jun09.pdf  Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 29 October 2009