Documents considered by the Committee on 14 October 2009, including the following recommendations for debate: Security of gas supply, Financial management - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


18  EC DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE IN 2008

(30779)
11863/09
+ ADD 1
COM(09) 296
Commission Annual Report 2009 on the European Community's Development and and External Assistance Policies and their Implementation 2008


Legal base
Document originated30 June 2009
Deposited in Parliament 10 July 2008
DepartmentInternational Development
Basis of consideration EM of 20 July 2009
Previous Committee Report None; but see (29779) 11137/08: HC 16-xxxvi (2007-8), chapter 12 (26 November 2008)
Discussed in Council27 July 2009 General Affairs and External Relations Council
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared, but further information requested

Background

18.1 The overall objectives of European Community development policy and external assistance are set out in Art 177 EC. Each year, the Commission produces an annual report on the activities carried out there under.

The Annual Report

18.2 This Report covers the activities under the European Community's external assistance programme in 2008. It consists of a 10 page Summary Report and a detailed 219-page annex in the form of a Commission Staff Working Document.

18.3 The Report's Summary looks at activity in 2008 under five main headings:

—  A truly global dimension;

—  Getting the policies right;

—  More and better aid;

—  Focus on results;

—  Working together.

18.4 Soaring food and energy prices and the global financial crisis posed new challenges. The Commission sees itself as having responded swiftly, highlighting in particular the €1 billion (£0.85 billion) EU Food Facility: "Responding in a flexible and effective way to the situation as it unfolds will remain a key objective for 2009".

18.5 In 2008, the EU was again the biggest international donor, providing almost 60% of global aid. The Report states that the value of funds committed during 2008 reached €9.33 billion (£7.95 billion), an increase of more than 90% in the rate of annual commitments since 2001. Africa continues to receive most new commitments with €5.2 billion in 2008 compared to €3.6 billion (£3.06 billion) in 2007. For Asia the corresponding totals are €1.9 billion (£1.61 billion) in 2008 and €1.7 billion (£1.44 billion) in 2007. Total disbursements also increased in 2008 to €9.1 billion (£7.75 billion) from €8.4 billion (£7.15 billion) in 2007.

18.6 The Commission also highlights the deepening of the EU's relations with partners across the world, particularly regarding issues such as climate change, energy, trade liberalisation and the attainment of the UN the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).[64] It notes its efforts to promote more regional cooperation and economic integration among the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) partners, particularly through negotiations for regional Economic Partnership Agreements.

18.7 The importance of maintaining commitments to the MDGs despite the difficult economic context is emphasised repeatedly. The Report highlights the EU's own contribution, including the EU Agenda for Action on MDGs (adopted in June 2008), which set milestones for 2010 to make up for lost ground on core social and environmental targets. The Commission also:

—  increased efforts to integrate gender, the environment and the rights of children and indigenous peoples into the development process;

—  "moved democratic governance to the top of its agenda as a marker and reference point in planning and delivering its technical and financial assistance";

—  "worked hard to make its aid more effective by creating coherence and synergy between the relevant geographic and thematic instruments which promote democracy and human rights".

18.8 Under More and better aid, the Commission notes that the EU "has been the driving force behind efforts to make aid more effective"; the Accra Agenda for Action (produced by the Third High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, in Ghana in September 2008) "sits well with the EU's own aspirations". The Commission sees all this and continuing discussions with Member States on how to carry the agenda forward as "a question of value for money — for the beneficiary countries and the European taxpayer". In 2008, the Commission "worked intensively to reform its technical cooperation and project implementation units", with the focus on developing local capacity and ownership and "a strong result-orientation".

18.9 Budget support is the "preferred delivery vehicle when conditions allow", and amounted to 39%, or €3.86 billion, of all EC budget and EDF commitments in 2008. Beneficiary countries must demonstrate their ability to manage public finances. Effective public finance management (PFM) "is essential to ensure that governments are accountable for European taxpayers' money entrusted to them for the benefit of their population." The Commission has committed itself to make budget support "more effective and transparent by strengthening PFM assessments, improving the structure and formulation of financial agreements, refining further the eligibility criteria for budget support and risk assessments, and improving reporting systems."

18.10 The Report includes a synthesis of the main lessons of the Commission's Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) system — a "transparent, rapid and comprehensive review of how a project is progressing at a given point in time [which is] carried out in all regions of external cooperation by independent experts [and uses a] well-structured and robust methodology … After eight years, ROM has proved its usefulness not only at project level to inform on project performance, but also at macro level to support management decisions, and at programming level to provide qualitative data for analysis."

18.11 The report concludes with a section on Working together, in which the Commission reviews its own endeavours to increase aid effectiveness by working with and through other international organisations where this is the most effective means of delivery, and emphasises the need for EU external assistance policy to focus "on achieving concrete results, enhancing the flexibility of its aid instruments and fostering action on regional integration."

The Government's view

18.12 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 20 July 2009, the Minister of State at the Department for International Development (Mr Gareth Thomas) says that "a consistent focus of UK attention is that the Reports demonstrate a clear link between EC development policy and meeting the MDGs." He notes that the Report "does stress the MDGs more strongly than in the past" and that, with the UN MDG Review Summit in September 2010, "the UK will be pushing for the 2010 Annual Report to include a focus on EU performance against its aid commitments."

18.13 The Minister goes on to say that "a key concern" in 2008 was that this year's Annual Report "should be more results-focused". He professes himself "pleased to note that the Commission has made a substantial effort to demonstrate real impact on the ground", and notes that the Report "introduces some useful text on specific sectors, country/region specific Success Stories and, in some cases, the approximate numbers of beneficiaries." He sees this as "a good start and mirrors DFID practice in the use of Case Studies", and says that he "will urge the Commission to consolidate this approach for the 2010 Annual Report."

18.14 Less positively, the Minister notes that the Report "does not contain gender disaggregated data", and says the he "will need to continue pushing for this as part of the Commission's Gender Equality Action Plan."

18.15 The Minister then notes that:

    "The Report makes a persuasive case for the EC as a leading driver of more effective aid, highlighting initiatives for: improving policy coherence; increased predictability of aid through the innovation of 'MDG Contracts'; and in ensuring a strong outcome from the Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (the Accra Agenda for Action).[65] The Report does not however assess EC performance against the various Paris Declaration[66] indicators. We will press for this in the next Report."

18.16 The Minister also notes that the Report has more detail than previously on the breakdown of new budget support commitments, including by country and instrument., drawing attention not only to budget support now being "the EC's 'preferred delivery vehicle'" but also to "the important caveat of 'when conditions allow'."

18.17 Overall, the Minister supports this Report, "particularly the new focus on demonstrating impact", and sees the messages in it as "also largely in line with UK external assistance objectives."

18.18 The Minister concludes by noting that the Report was to be considered by the 27 July 2009 General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC).

Conclusion

18.19 When we considered last year's Report, we noted that the then Minister had laid out clearly what he would be looking for in this year's Report:

—  clear links with the MDGs and the trends defined by the European Consensus on Development;

—  a more results based focus, including a sound Results Oriented Monitoring system;

—  the systematic drawing of lessons from those results in order to respond more effectively to any deficiencies;

—  further information about the implementation of EC General Budgetary Support in all the beneficiary countries concerned;

—  wherever possible, disaggregation of data, particularly by gender.[67]

18.20 With the exception of the last tiret, the focus of the Report continues to move in the right direction. The Minister has similarly laid out the areas upon which he will be focussing in the coming year, and upon which we ask him to report progress in his Explanatory Memorandum on the 2010 Report.

18.21 In the meantime, we clear the document, which we are drawing to the attention of the House, and of the International Development Committee, because of because of the widespread interest in EU development work and, in particular, the crucial role of the European Commission and its delegations in this field.

18.22 We also note that there appears to be no reference to the document in the official report of the 27 July GAERC, and ask the Minister to clarify if and when the Council is to consider it, and what Conclusions he expects the Council to adopt.



64   UN millennium development goals to be achieved by 2015 - the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, achievement of universal primary education, promotion of gender equality and female empowerment, reduction of child mortality, improvement of maternal health, combat of HIV/Aids, malaria and other diseases, environmental sustainability and a global partnership for development - each with its targets and indicators.  Back

65   Text available at http://www.adb.org/Documents/Aid-Effectiveness/consultative-draft.pdf  Back

66   The Paris Declaration, endorsed on 2 March 2005, is an international agreement to which over one hundred Ministers, Heads of Agencies and other Senior Officials adhered and committed their countries and organisations to continue to increase efforts in harmonisation, alignment and managing aid for results with a set of monitorable actions and indicators. See http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0,3343,en_2649_3236398_35401554_1_1_1_1,00.html for further information on the Declaration and on aid effectiveness in general. Back

67   See headnote: see (29779) 11137/08: HC 16-xxxvi (2007-8), chapter 12 (26 November 2008). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 29 October 2009