Documents considered by the Committee on 4 November 2009 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


3 Investing in the development of low carbon technologies

(30998)

14230/09

+ ADDs 1-4

COM(09) 519

Commission Communication: Investing in the development of low carbon technologies (SET Plan)

Legal base
Document originated7 October 2009
Deposited in Parliament13 October 2009
DepartmentEnergy and Climate Change
Basis of considerationEM of 21 October 2009
Previous Committee ReportNone, but see footnotes 18 and 19
To be discussed in CouncilSee para 3.18 below
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared, but relevant to the debate recommended on international climate finance

Background

3.1 As we have noted from time to time, the Commission has long believed that the Community needs to act quickly to increase the use of low-carbon energy technologies (including renewable energy), and it put forward in November 2007 a European Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan.[18] The aim of this would be to match the most appropriate set of policy instruments to the needs of different technologies at their different stages of development, and to identify those beyond the capacity of any single country, where the Community as a whole needs to find a way of mobilising resources, and public intervention is necessary since there is neither a natural market nor a short-term business benefit in supporting energy innovation.

3.2 The Commission went on to identify a number of measures which are either in place, or in the pipeline, as well as certain new long-term technologies, and to suggest that the Community should evolve a "new model of focussed cooperation", with the private sector at the forefront, but with Member States taking the action needed to increase investment, provide clear market signals, and strengthen the research base, and with the Community enabling the pooling of resources and sharing of risks, facilitating strategic planning, bringing about a better gathering and sharing of information, and addressing common problems and non-technological barriers. It also noted that the challenges arising require a global effort, and suggested that the Community has a significant role in fostering international cooperation.

3.3 The Plan then explored ways of achieving joint strategic planning (through the creation of new initiatives, such as a SET Plan Steering Group, a European Energy Research Alliance, a SET Plan Information System, and a number of private sector led European Industrial Initiatives); international cooperation; and the resources needed, adding in the latter case that the Commission intended to produce a further Communication on low-carbon technologies.

The current document

3.4 The current document seeks to fulfil that remit, and reiterates both the role which technology and the efficient use of resources can play and the need to act now to accelerate the development of those technologies with the greatest potential. It also says that a European approach is essential in order to provide the necessary scale and financial leverage, though it stresses that the figures it has produced should not be seen as a formal proposal for funding from the Community budget, but rather as an indication of orders of magnitude, with the bulk of the funds required having to come from the private sector and Member States.

EU CARBON TECHNOLOGY ROAD-MAP FOR 2010-20

3.5 The Commission says that investments over the next 10 years will have profound consequences for energy security and climate change in Europe, and that it has drawn up Technology Roadmaps for this period, which prioritise the different needs of the various technologies, depending upon their stage of development, but which will be subject to periodic review and amendment as necessary.

European Industrial Initiatives

3.6 The Commission says that these aim to turn into reality the opportunity to develop clean and efficient energy technologies, and will be accompanied by detailed implementation plans. It then highlights the position in a number of areas, as follows:

—  European wind initiative

The Commission says that wind energy has to accelerate the reduction of costs, move increasingly offshore and resolve associated grid integration issues if it is to fulfil its "huge" potential, and it suggests that there is a need to develop a better picture of wind resources in Europe, to build five to ten testing facilities for new turbine components, up to ten demonstration projects of next generation turbines, at least five prototypes of new offshore substructures tested in different environments, demonstrate new manufacturing processes, and test the viability of new techniques in remote and often hostile environments. It also suggests that these steps should be underpinned by a comprehensive research programme to improve the conversion efficiency of turbines.

It estimates that the total public and private investment needed in Europe over the next ten years is €6 billion, and it says that the return would be fully competitive wind generation capable of contributing up to 20% of Community electricity by 2020 (and 33% by 2030).

—  The solar Europe initiative

The Commission says that solar energy, including photovoltaics and concentrated solar power, has to become more competitive and gain mass market appeal, and to resolve problems arising from its distributed and variable nature. It suggests that this requires a long-term research programme focussed on advanced photovoltaic concepts and systems, up to five pilot projects for automated mass production, and a portfolio of demonstration projects for both decentralised and centralised photovoltaic production. As regards concentrated solar power, it sees the overriding need as being industrial scaling up of demonstrated technologies, supported by a research programme to reduce costs and improve efficiency, particularly through heat storage.

It says that this will require an estimated €16 billion of public and private investment in Europe over the next ten years, and that 15% of Community electricity could be generated by solar power in 2020 as a result.

—  European electricity grid initiative

The Commission says that electricity networks have to respond to three inter-related challenges — the creation of a real internal market, integrating a massive increase of intermittent energy sources, and managing complex interactions between suppliers and customers. It believes that this requires a strongly integrated research and development programme to develop new technologies to monitor, control and operate networks, as well as optimal strategies and market designs to provide the incentives needed to increase the overall efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the supply chain, with up to 20 large scale demonstration projects across Europe.

It says that the total public and private investment needed over the next ten years is estimated at €2 billion, the goal being the seamless integration of renewables in 50% of networks by 2020.

—  The sustainable bio-energy Europe initiative

The Commission says that bio-energy has to bring to commercial maturity the most promising technologies, but notes that different pathways are at various stages of maturity, with the most pressing need for many being the demonstration of the technology at an appropriate scale. It suggests that up to 30 such plants will be needed to take full account of differing geographical and climate conditions and logistical constraints, and that a longer term research programme should support the development of a sustainable bio-energy industry beyond 2020.

It estimates that the total public and private investment needed over the next ten years is €9 billion, and that the contribution of cost-competitive sustainable bio-energy to the Community's energy mix could be 14% by 2020.

—  The European carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage initiative

The Commission says that these technologies have to be widely commercialised if the Community is to achieve almost zero carbon power generation by 2050 and the continued use of coal is not to exacerbate climate change. It suggests that there is a pressing needing to demonstrate the full carbon capture and storage chain for a different range of options, in addition to which a comprehensive research programme will deliver improved components, integrated systems and processes to make carbon capture and storage commercially feasible in fossil fuel power plants.

It estimates that some €13 billion public and private investment will be needed over the next ten years, with a target of reducing by 2020 the cost to €30-50 per tonne of carbon dioxide abated, making it cost-effective within the carbon pricing environment.

—  The sustainable nuclear fission initiative

The Commission says that nuclear fission has to move towards long-term sustainability with a new Generation-IV reactor type, designed to maximise inherent safety, increase efficiency, produce less radioactive waste, and minimise proliferation risks. It adds that commercial deployment of these reactors is envisaged for 2040, but that this requires work to start now. It also says that the bulk of the programme up to 2020 will comprise design and construction of prototypes, fuel fabrication workshops and experimental facilities, and the development of new materials and components.

It estimates that the total public and private investment needed over the next ten years is €7 billion, and that the first Generation-IV prototypes should be in operation by 2020.

—  Fuel cells and hydrogen

The Commission notes that the Joint Technology Initiative (JTI) on fuel cells and hydrogen was established for 2008-13 with €470 million of Community funding, to be at least matched by industry. It says that the JTI has the minimum critical mass needed to develop efficient and cost-competitive technologies for the various applications, but that meeting market entry targets will require substantial additional effort, notably large-scale demonstrations and pre-commercial deployment activities. Also, long-term research and technology development is required to build up a competitive fuel cell chain and sustainable hydrogen infrastructure.

It says the additional public and private funding needed is currently put at €5 billion for the period 2013-20.

Energy efficiency — Smart Cities Initiative

3.7 The Commission says that energy efficiency is the simplest and cheapest way to secure carbon dioxide reductions, and that this new initiative aims to support ambitious pioneer cities to transform their buildings, energy networks and transport systems. Participating cities and regions will be expected to test and demonstrate the feasibility of going beyond current Community energy and climate objectives, involving a 40% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. It says that this is likely to require €11 billion public and private investment over the next ten years, with the initiative putting 25 to 30 European cities at the forefront of the transition to a low carbon future, leading to the wider development of smart networks.

European Energy Research Alliance

3.8 The Commission says that this Alliance is elevating cooperation between national research institutes to a new level, involving the collective devising and implementation of joint programmes, but that there is a need to build on this momentum in order to accelerate the development of new generations of low carbon technologies, and to shorten the time between ideas being taken out of the laboratory and adopted by industry. It says that over the next two years the Alliance will launch and implement joint programmes addressing key challenges with concrete technological objectives, developing strong links with Industrial Initiatives. It suggests that the Alliance could expand its activities to manage an additional public investment of €5 billion over ten years.

Complementary activities and initiatives

3.9 The Commission says that it is examining other avenues with great potential, such as alternative sources of offshore renewable energy, energy storage and renewable heating and cooling: and it suggests that the two key challenges for the nuclear sector are the life time extension of facilities and the disposal of waste. It also identifies fusion as a promising long-term energy source; draws attention to the "chronic" under-funding in the Community of breakthrough science in areas such as motor fuels from sunlight and battery storage, compared with the US; and stresses the need, in addition to the Energy Research Alliance, to activate other areas of science and research on energy and climate-related challenges, such as the European Space Agency and the proposed Knowledge and Innovation Communities. It also highlights the importance of international cooperation in stimulating investment in low carbon technologies and energy efficiency and providing support for such projects in developing countries, drawing attention to the potential role of the EU Strategic Forum for International Scientific and Technical Cooperation, and to the EU-China Near Zero Emissions Coal Project.

SHARING RISKS AND POOLING RESOURCES

3.10 The Commission believes that investment in the Community needs to increase from the current €3 billion a year to around €8 billion, representing an additional public and private investment of €50 billion over the next ten years, and it says that there is a need for a risk-sharing approach, with public support being justified where there are market failures, but with the private sector otherwise having to cope on its own. It adds that industry must be ready to accelerate the development and roll out of new technologies, and that banks and private investors will have to finance companies which will drive the transition to a low carbon economy (though it recognises that this represents a major challenge in the current financial crisis, requiring public authorities to offer appropriate incentives and policy signals). It points out that 70% of non-nuclear energy research in 2007 was financed privately, and that policy requirements call for a significant rise in the public share to a more equal level of commitment: it also says that 80% of public investment in this area has been at national level, and that an increase in the proportion of public investment at Community level may need to be explored in the budget review, with the level of funding required depending upon the interest of Member States in co-financing initiatives.

POSSIBLE SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDING

3.11 The Commission suggests that as from 2013 the new Emissions Trading Scheme will enable revenues from the auctioning of allowances to be reinvested at national level for the development of more efficient and lower cost clean technologies, with at least 50% having to be used for activities related to climate change. It adds that allowances set aside from the New Entrants Reserve will be used to support carbon capture and storage and innovative renewables, and will be made available through Member States to fund demonstration projects selected on criteria defined at Community level, subject to the proviso that this only facilitates the commercialisation of existing technologies, and does not cover technological risks. The Commission also says that current Community programmes, such as the Research Framework Programme, the Intelligent Energy-Europe Programme and the European Energy Programme for Recovery, are the natural instruments for this purpose, but that current resources are not sufficient to address all the actions envisaged.

IMPROVING COHERENCE AND MOBILISING THE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY

3.12 The Commission stresses the need for any public funding to be spent well, by maximising the incentive and leverage effect and ensuring the highest possible returns to society, and notes that the tools available include research and innovation programmes at national and Community level; debt based financing; venture capital funds; infrastructure funds; and market-based instruments. It also says that insufficient resources, fragmentation and lack of cross-fertilisation are a problem, but that the more coherent partnership approach now envisaged should help to address this.

3.13 In particular, it says that it will focus on the implementation phase, moving progressively towards co-investing in programmes rather than individual projects, and creating public-private partnerships with industry, striking the right balance between control and risk. However, it says that it will at the same time look for new ways to combine resources to finance large-scale demonstrations, and that the European Investment Bank (EIB) could play a pivotal role in mobilising and leveraging other public and private sector resources. It notes that, in response to the economic crisis, the EIB has increased its target in the energy field from €6.5 billion in 2008 to €9.5 billion in 2009 and €10.25 billion in 2010, and it says that it will be working with the EIB on a number of initiatives to achieve increased funding to finance the Plan. These include reinforcing the Risk Sharing Finance Facility; significantly increasing the resources of the 2020 European Fund for Energy, Climate Change and Infrastructure; developing a dedicated joint energy efficiency and renewable energy instrument to finance initial take-up of low carbon technologies; increasing Community support for venture capital markets, under the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme to encourage increased investment in such technologies; assessing the optimal financial packages for large demonstration or market replication projects; and establishing stronger links between the EIB and the European Community Group on Strategic Energy Technologies.

The Government's view

3.14 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 21 October 2009, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department for Energy and Climate Change (David Kidney) says that the UK agrees with the Commission's analysis that more investment will be needed over the next ten years and beyond, in order to deliver the significant energy technology development that will be needed to meet SET Plan objectives, and that a collaborative approach between Member States has the best chance of success. He adds that the scale of the challenge, the investment needed, and the source of funding are matters requiring continued debate and consideration, and he welcomes the Commission's suggestions that more investment can be delivered in partnership with the European Investment Bank and through strategically redirecting resources from current EU programmes towards SET Plan activity. He also notes the non-binding nature of the Communication's recommendations on additional Member State national spending, and says that the UK looks forward to continuing discussion of the ideas in the Communication and active participation in the SET Plan more generally.

3.15 However, the Minister is disappointed that the Commission has been unable to identify significant central EU funding, and says that this will need to be addressed urgently. In the meantime, he regards the expectation of significant additional national and private sector spending in the current financial climate as impractical, and points out that the call for significant increases in Member States' public expenditure would pose major challenges for many of them under the current financial situation. However, he notes that the Communication's recommendations on such increases are not binding, and suggests that the effect of the Communication is therefore likely to concentrate wider debate within the Community and in individual Member States on priorities, rather than to create immediate policy issues or budget difficulties.

3.16 The Minister says that there is no specific timetable attached to this Communication as its recommendations are non-binding. However, the underlying structures which will guide and support the additional spending it proposes, are due to be set-up by the end of 2010, and the increasing investment and activity is due to take place over the next ten years, in line with the technology roadmaps produced to support the Communication. With that in mind, engagement with the EIB has already started, as has the redirection of the Framework Programme Energy budget spending towards SET activity. Also, additional funding has been allocated from the European Economic Recovery Plan, leaving any additional central EU budget allocations still to be negotiated, along with any Member State national spending increases which remain a matter of national sovereignty.

Conclusion

3.17 This is an important document, which fulfils the Commission's intention of following up its earlier Communication on the Strategic Energy Technology Plan with an indication of the resources needed to develop low-carbon technologies over the next ten years to the extent necessary to contribute towards the Community's climate change objectives. As such, it covers a good deal of ground, but it also makes it clear that the figures quoted do not constitute a formal proposal, and are essentially an attempt to provide a broad order of magnitude of the levels of finance required.

3.18 Consequently, whilst we are drawing the document to the attention of the House, we are content to clear it, but we do regard it as relevant to debate in European Committee A which we recommended recently on a Commission Communication[19] on international climate finance.


18   (29194) 15458/07: see HC 16-vii (2007-08), chapter 12 (9 January 2008). Back

19   (30910) 13183/09: see HC 19-xxviii (2008-09), chapter 1 (21 October 2009). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 9 November 2009