Foreign and Commonwealth Office Annual Report 2007-08 - Foreign Affairs Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 66)

WEDNESDAY 9 JULY 2008

CHRIS MOXEY, CLIVE HEAPHY, STEVEN RYMELL AND KEITH LUCK

  Q60 Andrew Mackinlay: Mr Luck, you are from that side, are you not? You are a visitor, in that you are Foreign and Commonwealth Office. You are not with these other three, which begs the question, "What are you doing here?" I do not mean that unkindly.

  Chairman: Mr Mackinlay, I think that Mr Luck can answer your question.

  Keith Luck: Very much as you heard from Mr Moxey, when he introduced me, I am the sponsor. In fact, Chris and I retain a very close working relationship even after the trading fund was brought about. I act as principal stakeholder and principal shareholder on behalf of the FCO. I am the contact point that binds the organisation back into the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

    Your question is interesting. Mr Moxey mentioned the idea of shared services. We had explored that a little, but as the Chief Executive has indicated, their business is very much in that area of security. We need to focus on that. That is where they need to build their business, perhaps rather than being distracted by other aspects at this point in time.

  Q61  Chairman: We are getting warnings that the Minister is on her feet in the Chamber and there might be a vote soon. I would like to ask one or two final questions so that we do not have to come back after perhaps two votes. Your report refers to the focus on increasing "billable work" and reducing "low value-add activities". You say that that is "starting to have an impact". You give a staff utilisation rate of 65%, which I understand from what is written is those things that you can actually put a price on: what people working for you do and what you bill some organisations for. Are you doing functions that need to be done, but cannot easily be billable in that sense?

  Chris Moxey: No, I do not think we are, but may I come back to this question of a balanced scorecard approach to key performance indicators, and the question that you asked earlier about whether or not we have the right targeting in place that reflects what we are aspiring to do? Part of that balanced scorecard has at the heart of it the efficiency and productivity of our people. Why are we asking that question? On the one hand, we want to be sure that the people who are working for us are performing for the majority of their time, and within reason, revenue-producing activity. Getting that statistic correct and understanding it as intimately as we need to in the various parts of our business will make a key contribution to the decisions that we take over forward pricing arrangements—the offers that we make to clients, and an understanding of how much people cost and therefore how much they need to be sold for to give an appropriate return. Equally, however, the other side of the coin is that it properly informs our forward resource planning, so our recruitment plan, as we understand how utilised our people are, helps us to have right sight over the sorts of skills that we need in the future.

  Q62  Chairman: Is this the first year that you have ever done this exercise of providing this target of 65% staff utilisation for 2008-09? Is there a figure for 2006-07 or 2007-08?

  Chris Moxey: On a directly comparable basis, no. We grew greater certainty and understanding about what that measure was all about through the process of creating our strategic plan. The FCO, the Minister and we are firmly focused on the notion. We understand what productivity means. We want to move it from about 65% very much closer to 70%, and perhaps even a little higher. If it gets to that point, that would demonstrate strong and effective health within the organisation.

  Q63 Chairman: You cannot get to 100% can you?

  Chris Moxey: No, we certainly cannot.

  Q64 Chairman: And you probably could not get to 90%, could you?

  Chris Moxey: No. People have down time. They are certainly off sick from time to time.

  Chairman: They have holidays.

  Chris Moxey: Exactly. They have annual leave that needs to be adhered to, and training and courses. We develop the skills and competencies of our staff throughout the organisation. We do not expect 100%, but we want to be clear about how they are recording their time so that it deals with those issues at either end.

  Q65 Chairman: At the same time, you are under pressure to have efficiency savings as well?

  Chris Moxey: That is right.

  Q66 Chairman: Which could perhaps have a negative impact on the quality of the work that you do or, alternatively, you might have job vacancies for several months while you are dealing with efficiency by reducing your staff complement, but it takes time to recruit someone else so your utilisation rate does not work properly.

  Chris Moxey: Yes, there is a difficult balance in all that. That is why the FCO, and the advice that we together offer the Minister in setting these formal targets, is not setting the hurdle too high for us, given the change in arrangements that we have ahead of us in this the early stages—our first year—of our being a Trading Fund.

  Chairman: Thank you. Gentlemen, I think that we will conclude here. Thank you for coming. I place on record how much those of us who went enjoyed our visit to Hanslope Park. We hope to go again at some point to see what progress you are making. We were impressed by the quality of the people whom we met there.

  Chris Moxey: Thank you, Chairman. You would be welcome any time.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 8 February 2009