Knife Crime - Home Affairs Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 380-391)

WITNESS 6, WITNESS 7 AND WITNESS 8

10 MARCH 2009

  Q380  You can take part in a team and there are chances for you to play?

  Witness 7: There is more chance of me making a team and putting it into a league. I play football quite a lot but then again you get money.

  Witness 8: The Youth Inclusion Project holiday is a football type of event.

  Witness 7: We had a football match against Merseyside Police.

  Q381  Mr Clappison: You think playing soccer is good for keeping people out of trouble?

  Witness 7: Yes.

  Witness 8: Yes, there are also sports like rugby, for example. I am a rugby fan but there are people who are not into football who are in to rugby or basketball.

  Q382  Mr Clappison: Is it rugby league or union?

  Witness 8: Both.

  Q383  Mr Clappison: I can see you as a useful player.

  Witness 8: It is not just football that people need because football could get boring but there are other sports, like basketball.

  Mr Clappison: That is good to hear.

  Q384  Gwyn Prosser: On the issue of the research, and I might have missed this when you were going through the headlines, what did it tell you about young people's attitudes to the effect of the impact of advertising campaigns and media launches?

  Witness 6: In terms of trying to diversify?

  Q385  Gwyn Prosser: Yes.

  Witness 6: We have not had a lot about that, to be quite honest. We talk more about the importance of role models and being able to talk with people. What they say to us is that it does need to be real. That is the real message. We heard earlier about the film, and Witness 7 and Witness 8 were saying that is more real and that would have an impact more than just being talked to. I think we need to have a range. The evidence that we have had is there needs to be a range of approaches really, one cannot just go for one because it is a bit like sport, football suits one person and rugby suits somebody else. Whether it is a talk or a film or somebody coming in to your school, a former offender, there need to be a range of options that people can draw upon so that we are really all trying to tackle this together, using everything at our disposal.

  Witness 8: That is also another type of abuse you get as well, what sport you follow. Being a rugby fan and a rugby player I get a lot of smack talk from people who follow football or being an Evertonian I get smack talk from people who follow Liverpool and that is also another type of abuse you get.

  Ms Buck: That is not new. It does not make it good.

  Q386  Mr Winnick: Can I just ask, Witness 7 and Witness 8, are you intending to stay on at school to 18? Is that your intention?

  Witness 7: Yes.

  Witness 8: Yes.

  Witness 7: I will stay on at school and go to college, make something of my life.

  Witness 8: Yes, I want to go to college and university.

  Q387  Mr Winnick: It just occurs to me, Ms Buck, that I doubt if any member around this table at 15—I am not being patronising in any way, I hope not—would have had the confidence to address a group of MPs. I doubt if I would have done so at that age. We are very impressed indeed.

  Witness 8: Thank you very much.

  Witness 7: Thank you.

  Q388  Ms Buck: Can I ask Witness 6 about your research. You referred to the importance of role models or peers that had fallen off the tracks and got back on again.

  Witness 6: Yes.

  Q389  Ms Buck: The Government seems to be appointing all sorts of people; in fact I think we are seeing one later on, Richard Taylor, as a kind of envoy to raise the issues around knives and things. Do you think that there is a sufficiently strategic approach to having these kinds of peers or role models in primary schools or wherever they need to be, and does your project have a group of such role models?

  Witness 6: We are not running that kind of project. Our project, in a sense, has been really about finding out what young people are seeing as the main issues in relation to gun and knife crime: why is it happening and what do they think the solutions are. It is not our task and we do not have the resources to put those solutions in place. The question in relation to if there is a sufficiently strategic approach, I have to say I think we are at an early stage and that we are all struggling to find the right way which is why I very much hope that our research and our evidence will contribute to that debate. I was recently at the Channel 4 Street Crimes Commission and there was a lot of discussion there about the setting up of something like the violent crime reduction unit that they have got in Scotland where there will be one place that will be collating the evidence about what works and then disseminating that out across the country because I think there is general recognition that to some extent we are still all wondering around in the dark. A lot of the research is coming out of the United States but it is still hard to know exactly what does work. An awful lot of things that are happening have good intentions rather than because actually there is evidence out there that it works. I think we are at an early stage in terms of being able to make that judgment but the general consensus, if I can just say this, in the room at the Street Crimes Commission—I suppose there were about 50 or 60 of us there, covering quite a wide spectrum of people involved in the field, the police and lots and lots of different people—was that something like that, where it has to be quite the same, in a sense takes a public health approach, that gathers in the evidence and then disseminates it out across the country and makes sure that the good work is taking place everywhere and there is an evidence base has very real merits. I think that has been put forward as a very serious proposal.

  Q390  Ms Buck: Thank you very much. That was extremely helpful. We look forward to receiving the research you referred to.

  Witness 6: Absolutely. It will be our pleasure.

  Q391  Ms Buck: Witness 7 and Witness 8, I think as David Winnick said, there are grown adults who have turned to jelly before giving evidence to Select Committees. You have given enormously impressive evidence. I think we have all learned a lot from what you have said. Thank you very much and good luck to both of you.

  Witness 7: Thank you.

  Witness 8: Thank you.

  Witness 6: Can I thank you very much, on their behalf as well. I think it has probably been a wonderful experience for them and thank you so much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 2 June 2009