The Trade in Human Beings: Human Trafficking in the UK - Home Affairs Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by the Union of Construction, Allied Trades and Technicians

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  UCATT is the largest specialist union for construction workers with 120,000 members in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. UCATT is the lead union among the signatories to the National Working Rule Agreement of the Construction Industry Joint Council and the Joint Negotiating Committee for Local Authority Craft and Associated Employees.

  UCATT is represented on a number of construction industry related bodies including; the Strategic Forum for Construction, Construction Skills Training Board and the Construction Skills Certification Scheme.

  Our evidence to this enquiry into human trafficking is based upon trafficked migrant labour experience within the construction industry.

  Human trafficking in the construction industry is common among gangmasters from A8 accession states and with Bulgaria and Romanian workers having employment rights restricted the issue could also impact on economic migrants from these states.

  The growth of gangmasters and labour providers exploiting trafficked migrant workers is a major concern. We have instances of migrant workers being paid well below the agreed rates within the construction industry and also below the national minimum wage.

  In construction the gang-master can operate as an employment agency. They advertise, in the trade press, that they have cheap migrant workers available. When UCATT officials visit sites and speak to these workers they often find that their rates of pay are much lower than the indigenous worker and health and safety training has not been given. In an industry with the highest number of fatalities and serious injuries this is totally unacceptable.

  These gangmasters are able to exploit fragmented industries throughout the UK. In construction, an industry fragmented to the extent where you have significant percentage of workers wrongly classified as self-employed in order for contractors to escape income tax, NI, sick pay and pensions, there is an unhealthy approach to illegality. The use of bogus self-employed allows the fragmentation of the construction industry to such an extent that gangmasters and labour providers' use of illegal labour is rife on major contracts throughout the UK.

  UCATT has found that the greatest abuses tend to occur in circumstances where the gangmaster controls the work of migrant workers and their accommodation.

  As the law stands the construction industry is not included within the scope of the Gangmasters Licensing Bill.

  UCATT supports the Gangmasters Licensing Bill as an important step forward for the industries included in the bill, agriculture, and shellfish gathering and associated processing and packaging sectors. The construction industry is an industry that in future should be looked at with regards the licensing of gang-masters, with expansive growth of agencies and labour providers within the industry.

  UCATT is concerned that some of the problems highlighted in the agriculture, shellfish gathering and associated processing and packaging sectors are typical in the construction industry. These problems are manifest on a number of construction sites across the UK through trafficked labour.

SCALE OF THE PROBLEM IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Overview of Migrant/Trafficked Workers Employment Status in UK

  1.  It is the view of UCATT that there is a direct correlation between employment status and the trafficking of labour, often involving migrant labour in the construction industry. Our research estimates that on major sites over 75% of labour are classified as self-employed. This is contrary to other European states. The UK labour market shows a ratio of 11 to 1 in terms of self-employment over direct employment from workers entering from the EU27. This is largely because the UK Worker Registration Scheme places a duty on those directly employed in the UK to enrol into the scheme. Conversely those that are classified self-employed can enter without registration as set out in the Accession (Immigration and Worker Registration) Regulations 2008.

  2.  Another explanation is the distinction between genuine self-employment and false self-employment. A genuinely self-employed person would have to understand legal and taxation systems and to acquire skills to deal with clients that are different from that of a directly employed worker. This has often acted as a barrier to genuine self-employment among migrant workers. Take these barriers away, through the Construction Industry Scheme, that allows self-employment as paid workers, then you have an opportunity for contractors to avoid payments of national insurance, income tax, holiday pay and other employee benefits while managing to control workers pay, hours and method of work.

Scale of the Problem

  3.  UCATT conducted research across all Regions in the UK to detect the scale of the problem of exploitation of migrant trafficked labour with many appalling instances reported by our Regional Officials. Our overriding conclusion is that there are major similarities in the treatment of migrant workers trafficked from foreign countries to the UK. The systematic abuse of workers by contractors, employment agencies and gangmasters in the construction industry is a constant thread in our research among migrant workers in the UK.

Case Studies

  4.  While UCATT understands that the committee terms of reference make clear that they cannot act in individual cases of exploitation towards trafficked workers, the only way to submit evidence to inform the committee is through case studies in the construction industry and to highlight cases that our officers have dealt with.

  The following cases highlight experience in three UCATT regions and are indicative of the kind of exploitation that exists across the entire UK construction industry.

MIDLANDS REGION

Birmingham, Derby

  5.  UCATT unearthed a case of appalling systematic abuse of vulnerable migrant workers on a PFI hospital in Mansfield. Our officer obtained the workers pay slips, which revealed that some workers took home just £8.80, after working a 40-hour week.

  Dry lining subcontracting company Produm employed the dozen Lithuanian workers. The workers were paid below agreed minimum rates for the site operated by main contractor Skanska, they did not receive overtime (some workers worked in excess of 70 hours and took home less than £100) and were charged excessive deductions for rent, tools and utility bills. It is understood that many of these charges were unlawful.

  UCATT were only able to uncover the extent of the abuse after some of the workers stopped being paid altogether with the company currently owing some workers five weeks' pay. The workers were initially scared of approaching the union because the company also provided their accommodation.

NORTH WEST REGION

Manchester, Liverpool, Cheshire

  6.  UCATT officials visiting a site found that workers had been given Construction Skills Certification Scheme cards without having gone through health and safety testing or the training and a skills verification process to gain these cards. A young Polish worker, brought from an agency informed our officer that he had given a passport sized photo to an agency before leaving Poland and that on arrival in the UK, he was sent to an address in Manchester where certificates were awaiting him to enable him to work in the UK. This information was passed to police to investigate as it amounted to fraud.

  Following further investigation on the site our officer uncovered shocking employment practices. Migrant workers trafficked from Poland were working between 85-90 hours per week, paid £4.75 per hour living in squalid conditions with the practice of hot-bedding being the norm with up to 11 workers sharing a two-bedroom house.

NORTHERN REGION

Newcastle, Cumbria, Middlesbrough

  7.  Our development officer in this region was tasked with operating a recruitment and information drive for Migrant Workers entering the construction industry in the region. The local Trades Union Congress in the Northern Region is very proactive in highlighting the issue and UCATT contributed to the study in the region.

    (a) In Newcastle a UCATT official found trafficked workers charged £900 per month for a two-bedroom flat that would be assessed by The Rent Service as being fairly charged at a figure around £350-400 per month. Not only this but in trying to give workers information about employment rights the official was duly assaulted and threatened by the gangmaster and family members.

    (b) In Durham our officer found trafficked Polish construction workers being paid as little as £3 per hour (construction industry rate for job £9.72) working in excess of 80 hours per week. One worker on the site suffered an assault at the hands of a managing director of a sub-contractor. As the practice of fear and intimidation used by some gangmasters, agencies and employers in the building industry allow a culture of fear to permeate among migrant workers in particular, UCATT was not surprised when the worker would not report the incident for fear of losing his job or further reprisals.

CONCLUSION

  UCATT has offered a brief summary of the types of exploitation that trafficked workers in the UK experience on a daily basis. As I have outlined in our summary, the method of employment used for migrant workers often restricts rights and allows a control to be help by agencies, gangmasters and contractors.

  It is our policy to campaign to end this practice of bogus self-employment and we have produced research and literature explaining to the government how this undermines both the employment rights of workers in the construction industry and also the tax evasion and receipts lost to the treasury through national insurance and employers tax payments. Much of the recent rise in this false self-employment can be attributed to trafficked migrant labour. Employers have taken advantage of the vulnerability of migrant labour, shown in our case study evidence, and exacerbated their insecurity by engaging them as false self-employed workers. Government regulations make it easier to migrate as self-employed and this had played into the evasion economy character of the UK construction industry.

  UCATT has consistently held the view that vulnerable workers in the construction industry should be protected from this exploitation. An introduction of the Gangmasters Licensing Bill to extend to the construction industry is, in our view, long overdue, with evidence showing similar problems existing in construction as those covered by the legislation.

January 2009







 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 14 May 2009