Aid Under Pressure: Support for Development Assistance in a Global Economic Downturn - International Development Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Christian Aid

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  Christian Aid works in nearly 50 countries worldwide, supporting local organisations to deliver urgently needed services directly to poor communities, and to scrutinise and hold their own governments and the international community to account.

  We have followed the Financing for Development Process from its inception in Monterrey in 2002 focussing on issues of Debt, Aid, Trade and most recently Taxation.

  We reaffirm the Financing for Development process as a representative forum for agreeing international commitments to development and therefore welcome the opportunity provided by this submission to share our views on the outcomes of the review conference.

  Our submission will focus on the outcomes of the Doha review conference and the role which the UK government can play in ensuring developing countries are supported through the challenges of the financial crisis, ensuring that reform of financial architecture reduces the vulnerability of developing countries to future macro-economic shocks, and supporting the capacity of developing countries to mobilise domestic and international resources for development.

Our recommendations for the UK government are as follows:

  We welcome DFID's existing support for the financing for development process and in particular, DFID's recent emphasis on the role of effective taxation in mobilising domestic resources for development.

  The impact of the financial crisis compounds the problems faced by many developing countries as a result of poverty, the food crisis and the climate crisis. DFID should ensure that Official Development Assistance (ODA) commitments are maintained at this time of financial uncertainty.

  DFID should support providing affordable liquidity for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in countries where finance is difficult or expensive to obtain would limit rises in unemployment, and prevent a deepening of the impact of the financial crisis.

  The capacity to mobilise domestic resources for development and end aid dependency should be prioritised. In addition to funding for policy think tanks in developing countries, DFID should support the capacity of revenue authorities in developing countries to raise domestic revenue, negotiate pro-poor tax agreements with private sector actors, and investigate cases of corporate tax evasion.

  DFID should use its leverage as a reputable bilateral aid agency to encourage developing country governments to ratify the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and call for the introduction of a strong monitoring mechanism to ensure the principles enshrined in the convention are implemented.

  The UK government should urgently address the issue of financial opacity which has contributed to the financial crisis and facilitates illicit capital flight as a result of corporate tax evasion.

  Christian Aid proposes an International Accounting Standard for Country by Country reporting, which would require companies to report where they are located, where they make profit and where they pay taxes.

  Finally, the UK should urgently address the financial opacity in tax havens which are British Overseas Territories and ensure that the European Union addresses this issue appropriately and urgently by expanding the European Union Savings Tax Directive to include trusts and other financial vehicles.

1.  Introduction

  1.1  The Doha review conference was an opportunity to galvanise existing commitments towards sustainable development. It also represented an opportunity to increase commitments and address systemic issues in light of the Climate Crisis, the Food Crisis and the Financial Crisis.

  1.2  Weakening of language on key issues and the failure to reach agreement on timetables and lines of responsibility within the Doha Outcome Document (DOD) represents a missed opportunity for developing countries. The DOD is largely a restatement of the Monterrey Consensus. At this moment of deep crisis this is inadequate.

  1.3  Christian Aid calls the UK government to honour commitments made ahead of the Doha conference in the European Council Statement of 11 November 2008.

2.  Progress towards the UN target for developed countries to spend 0.7% of their Gross National Product on Official Development Assistance (ODA), which was reaffirmed in the Doha Declaration;

  2.1  While Christian Aid does not consider ODA to be the primary long-term solution to sustainable development, it can support the creation of infrastructure required for long term pro-poor development including enabling environments for pro-poor private sector development, good governance and effective taxation.

  2.2  Least developed countries, dependent on ODA, must receive predictable funding to ensure the sustainability of essential public services to the poorest and most vulnerable.

  2.3  The Doha Outcome Document (DOD) restated the long-standing commitment of Northern countries to reach the 0.7% of GNP for ODA, which had been highlighted in the Monterrey Consensus. Six years later the implementation gap is growing as Northern countries fail to meet aid commitments.

  2.4  In October 2008, Jacques Diouf, Director General of the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) highlighted that only 10% of the US$22 billion pledged earlier in 2008 to help ease food shortages has so far been delivered.[23]

  2.5  The DOD's Reference to multi annual aid timetables to ensure donors step up their aid levels and reach the promised targets—was agreed at the end of the conference but language was weakened to "rolling indicative timetables".

  2.6  It is imperative that the UK does not use this weakened language within the DOD to renege on its ODA commitments.

3.  The extent to which the current financial situation will impact on donors' ability to meet their ODA commitments and the implications of this for DFID's aid policies;

  3.1  At times of crisis, developing countries that are most vulnerable to macro-economic shocks become more reliant on predictable ODA. However, it is likely that donors will reduce commitments as domestic budgets within donor countries are reduced. The development committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) has highlighted that developing countries will be especially dependent on predictable flows of ODA and has emphasised the enhanced importance of donors meeting ODA commitments.[24]

  3.2  At this time, a strong reaffirmation of aid commitments from UK and European donors is paramount and would send a clear message that the UK is committed to development even when facing economic uncertainty itself.

4.  Whether international aid commitments should be increased to address the impact of the global economic downturn;

  4.1  Christian Aid's partner organisations are already witnessing increased hardship in developing countries as a result of the financial crisis, the food crisis and the climate crisis. At this time of economic downturn, the poor in developing countries face multiple challenges.

  4.2  Remittances, which in some developing countries account for 20% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), are already falling as economic migrants working overseas loose their jobs. Remittances are used for daily necessities. In countries such as Mexico more than 57% of remittances are used to purchase essential goods such as food, clothing and shelter.

  4.3  Developing countries which are dependent on exports will face increasing pressure as demand from the US and Europe falls. In particular, commodity dependent economies are particularly vulnerable to booms and busts in international commodity markets.[25]

  4.4  Short-term loans which finance as much as 90% of the world's trade have become more difficult and more expensive to obtain as a result of the financial crisis.

  4.5  Tax revenues in developing countries are likely to fall with declines in export demand, commodity values, and employment. This will have a direct knock-on effect on states' ability to provide education, health services and pro-poor spending.

  4.6  Emerging markets have suffered significantly from the financial crisis as investors become more conservative. Asia, which experienced average inflows of more than US$15bn a year from 2004-07, in 2008 experienced outflows of more than US$15bn.[26]

  4.7  ODA should contribute to poverty reduction through pro-poor growth via inclusive private sector development.

  4.8  Christian Aid welcomes commitments within the DOD for macroeconomic policies which avoid abrupt economic fluctuations and seek to minimise domestic and external imbalances to ensure that the benefits of growth reach all people. In the long-term, ODA should be targeted towards measures which shield developing countries against future macro-economic shocks. This includes the development of revenue authorities and the effective regulation of financial services.

5.  Progress on the mobilisation of domestic resources for development including strengthening national taxation systems, combating capital flight and DFID's role in enabling countries to harness their own resources.

  5.1  Christian Aid believes that in the medium and long term, developing countries must be enabled to raise domestic resources for development and end aid dependency. This can be achieved through trade, responsible private sector development and effective taxation. In this regard we welcome the reaffirmation that national ownership and leadership of development strategies and good governance are important for effective mobilisation of domestic resources for development.

  5.2  Christian Aid welcomes the commitment to promote an enabling environment to promote entrepreneurship. Responsible private sector development must include decent work and environmentally sustainable practices, as well as responsibility in financial practices, including taxation. The regulatory environment should ensure that these responsibilities are kept.

  5.3  Taxation plays a key role in regulating the private sector organisations, in providing domestic resources for development, and in improving accountability between state and citizen as governments are most likely to act in the interests of their greatest source of revenue.[27] Christian Aid welcomes the commitments made within the DOD to step up efforts to enhance tax revenues, and in particular, ensuring the tax systems is more pro-poor. In light of these commitments and the long-term benefits of taxation, DFID should increase support for effective domestic revenue collection and socially progressive taxation.

  5.4  The ability of sovereign states to effectively collect tax revenue is undermined by illicit capital flight as a result of criminal activity, in particular, corporate tax evasion. The DOD refers to capital flight and illicit financial flows as strongly linked to money-laundering, stolen assets, and capital flows that have criminal intent and corruption. Christian Aid welcomes support for the implementation of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and urges to UK government to consider a strong monitoring mechanism which would evaluate measures taken by governments to implement the convention.

  5.5  Christian Aid has calculated that developing countries lose US$160 billion per year as a result of two forms of commercial tax evasion, this is equivalent to one and a half times the global aid budget. One third of all illicit flows are related to corruption and proceeds from criminal activities and the remaining two thirds are related to tax avoidance and evasion by multinational corporations operating in developing countries. Consideration of illicit capital flows should be widened to address commercial activities.

  5.6  International cooperation in tax matters is essential to close loopholes in international accounting and address tax evasion. The upgrading of the UN Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters to an intergovernmental body, adequately resourced and properly mandated, could provide a truly representative forum for international tax cooperation. However, language in the DOD was weakened to requesting that the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) "examine the strengthening of institutional arrangements, including the UN tax committee." Christian Aid is concerned that this issue will not be addressed appropriately or as urgently as required.

  5.7  The financial crisis has highlighted the need for financial transparency to ensure stability in financial markets. However, financial transparency would also assist developing and developed nations to identify corporations likely to be evading tax. The DOD commits to "further refine, as appropriate, the supervisory and regulatory mechanisms to enhance the transparency and accountability of the financial sector". In this regard, Christian Aid proposes an International Accounting Standard for Country by Country reporting, which would require companies to report where they are located, where they make profit and where they pay taxes.

  5.8  The DOD addresses tax issues in foreign direct investment (FDI) acknowledging that it is important to promote good tax practices and avoid inappropriate ones. It is unfortunate that stronger language, "avoid detrimental tax practices," was removed. Christian Aid recommends that the UK government consider this language and support developing countries in negotiating favourable tax treaties which will be of maximum benefit to the poor.

  5.9  The need to address secrecy in tax havens (secrecy jurisdictions) is absent in the DOD. The European Council Statement of 11 November 2008 included the need to "combat tax havens". In the context of the financial crisis, and lost tax revenue from both developed and developing countries to tax havens, the UK should urgently address the financial opacity in tax havens which are British Overseas Territories and ensure that the European Union addresses this issue appropriately and urgently.

6  Additional Issues: Systemic issues: enhancing the coherence of the international monetary, financial and trading systems in support of development

  6.1  The DOD emphasised a central role for the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWI) in the international financial architecture and the global economic governance. Despite acknowledgement in the DOD on the need to provide "greater transparency and strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries in international decision-making and norm-setting" and that "the Bretton Woods institutions need to be further reformed", the document reaffirms that the BWI "must continue … to help developing countries to deal with the adverse effects of exogenous shocks". This approach shows complacency with the current status quo and fails to acknowledge the BWI's failure to provide adequate advice to developing countries on their economic policies.

  6.2  Christian Aid affirms the need for adequate representation of developing countries in the reform of the financial architecture and welcomes the convening "a conference at the highest level on the world financial and economic crisis and its impact on development." The G20 meeting of April 2009 and the UN conference are unique opportunities to address systemic flaws in the financial system and reaffirm support to developing countries in a time of crisis. Christian Aid urges the UK to consider long-term development goals at this these meetings, proposing reforms, which are far reaching and positive for pro-poor development and globalisation.

7.  Our recommendations to DFID:

  7.1  The impact of the financial crisis compounds the problems faced by many developing countries as a result of poverty, the food crisis and the climate crisis. DFID should ensure that Official Development Assistance (ODA) commitments are maintained at this time of financial uncertainty.

  7.2  The capacity to mobilise domestic resources for development and end aid dependency should be prioritised. In addition to funding for policy think tanks in developing countries, DFID should support the capacity of revenue authorities in developing countries to raise domestic revenue, negotiate pro-poor tax agreements with private sector actors, and investigate cases of corporate tax evasion.

  7.3  DFID should use its leverage as a reputable bilateral aid agency to encourage developing country governments to ratify the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and call for the introduction of a strong monitoring mechanism to ensure the principles enshrined in the convention are implemented.

  7.4  The UK government should urgently address the issue of financial transparency which has contributed to the financial crisis and facilitates illicit capital flight as a result of corporate tax evasion.

  7.5  Christian Aid proposes an International Accounting Standard for Country by Country reporting, which would require companies to report where they are located, where they make profit and where they pay taxes.

  7.6  Finally, the UK should urgently address the financial opacity in tax havens which are British Overseas Territories and ensure that the European Union addresses this issue appropriately and urgently.










23   Political, financial push urged to end hunger: Rome ceremony celebrates World Food Day', United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 16 October 2008, www.fao.org/Newsroom/en/news/2008/1000940/index.html Back

24   Development Committee Communiqué by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund's Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors of the Bank and the Fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries, 12 October 2008, http://siteresources. worldbank.org/DEVCOMMINT/NewsAndEvents/21937474/ FinalCommunique101208.pdf Back

25   In 2008 Copper fell from US$8,454 per tonne to US$6,198 per tonne, while Nickel fell from US$37,136 in 2007 to US$15,494 in mid October 2008. Back

26   IMF Global Financial Stability Report, October 2008, p 45, www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2008/02/index.htm Back

27   "Can tax challenge bad governance?" Christian Aid Occasional Paper, September 2008. http://christianaid.org.uk/images/OPS_one.pdf Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 2 June 2009