Urbanisation and Poverty - International Development Committee Contents


Annex A

INTERNATIONAL DONOR INTERESTS ON URBANISATION AND POVERTY

How effectively are developing country governments and donors addressing the challenges presented by urban poverty? The donors considered here are: the ADB, the AfDB, the UNDP and selected bi-lateral donors.

GENERAL

  The types of investment from donors that can potentially improve the lives of poor urban dwellers and the quality of slums/poor urban neighbourhoods include such elements as:

    — Governance.

    — Environment (climate change, pollution control and clean air, etc. as well as planning policies, urban design, provision of green space, disaster planning, etc).

    — Poverty reduction and social considerations (education, gender, employment, etc).

    — Land use, registration and tenure.

    — Infrastructure (water and sanitation, roads, electricity, etc).

    — Services (transport, healthcare, municipal services, etc).

    — Urban local economic development.

    — Housing.

    — Rural-urban linkages.

  In addition, concerns about climate change and the current economic downturn are affecting donor responses to urbanisation and poverty, as outlined below;

    (1) Climate change is leading to more money being allocated to the urban sector, particularly on mitigation and adaptation (areas where cities are thought to be significant players), and which is also allowing organisations previously not involved in development, to allocate money (eg the European Investment Bank now has a mandate from the EU to invest in climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing countries; the German Ministry of Environment has opened up a line of support to work in the urban sector in developing countries). Climate change is seen to be both an opportunity for greater focus on the urban sector, but also to be taking focus away from targeted programmes such as urban poverty reduction or slum upgrading.

    (2) The fallout from the financial crisis, and the stimulus packages introduced by various countries and lending agencies have a strong focus on investing in urban infrastructure. The financial crisis will undoubtedly lead to greater urban poverty however there is little direct focus on poverty reduction or slum-upgrading. The focus is mainly on job creation through infrastructure works, many of which will take place in cities. As yet, most countries and donors are indicating that funding will increase or be maintained.

  There appears to be little focus on urban poverty or slum upgrading as a specific programme theme or investment goal. Often poor housing and poverty tend to be identified as downstream impacts rather than actual targets. Some anecdotal reasons given for this were that these projects tend to be more difficult and "messy", with results that can be hard to demonstrate. It would appear that donors and countries now consider climate change to have a higher priority and profile than urban poverty and have changed focus accordingly. Also there is the continuing belief (sometimes, but not always, true) that poverty is worse in rural areas.

  However, there is an emerging sense that urban issues are rising in prominence and that resources should be commensurate with the high global rate of urbanisation, having spent the past decade being under-funded, dispersed and not receiving attention. There is some optimism among urban professionals that these issues are now higher on the development agenda, however, this is mainly with regards to infrastructure. There was less of a consensus that urban poverty reduction, housing or slum upgrading would start to receive more direct investment.

1.  ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

Activities and emphasis of ADB:

    — Since late 1960s, approximately 200 urban projects have been funded and implemented by the ADB, totalling approximately USD15 billion.

    — Much of ADB's lending and technical assistance has focused on urban water supply, sanitation, and wastewater management.

    — The financial crisis has brought an increased focus on urban infrastructure and ADB spending in the urban sector has recently increased to USD2 billion per year (from around USD1 billion per year on average previously[37]).

    — Within the ADB, there has been an increasing focus on the urban sector since about 2006.

    — The current guiding policy document of the ADB, Strategy 2020, summarises ADB urban priorities as follows:

    — Liveable cities. To improve the quality of life for their inhabitants and to reduce the carbon footprint of Asia's cities—ie, the amount of harmful greenhouse gases produced—ADB will assist Developing Member Countries (DMCs) and their municipalities in addressing a range of environmental problems resulting from rapid urbanisation. These include reducing air and water pollution, supporting cleaner modes of transport, improving systems for solid waste management, and reducing urban waste.

    — Urban infrastructure. ADB will focus on water supply, sanitation, waste management, and urban transport. ADB's infrastructure operations will not be limited to building physical assets. They will also include improving the delivery of infrastructure services, which will create an enabling environment for the private sector. ADB will: (i) build DMCs' capacity for better infrastructure management, (ii) promote institutional and policy reforms that enhance operational efficiency and sustainability of infrastructure projects, and (iii) support logistical systems to increase trade and investment.

    — Approach: In terms of operational approach, the ADB emphasises engaging with the private sector.

    — Guiding documents: In 1999 the ADB produced an Urban Sector Strategy, which was reviewed in 2005 in light of developments such as the MDGs. A further review was completed in 2006, the findings of which pointed out the fact that ADB investment was nowhere near commensurate with the rate of urban growth in the region and led to an increased focus on the urban sector within the ADB. As a result of the 2006 Review, the urban sector was included in the ADB strategy document, Strategy 2020 and a document called Managing Asia's Cities was produced. These documents led to the establishment of the Cities Development Initiative for Asia (CDIA), an organisation promoting investment in cities (in collaboration with GTZ, with additional funding from SIDA and Spain).

    — Types of projects: A brief review of ADB projects from 2008 reveals a broad view of the scope of the urban sector. Initiatives include elements of urban water supply and sanitation, housing, urban drainage and flood control, urban transport, urban environment, slum improvement, sites and services, (urban) institutional strengthening and capacity building, urban land management, urban governance, and urban finance. Poverty reduction components and micro-credit are also endorsed as part of the urban sector, when included in urban development projects.

    — Climate change is having an impact on re-focusing resources towards climate proofing cities, enabling sustainable development and elements such as cleaner and more extensive public transport.

    — Loans and TA: In 2009, the ADB will be providing loans and technical assistance to approximately 47 projects broadly considered to be in the urban sector. Some examples include the Second Neighbourhood Upgrading and Shelter Sector project in Indonesia (USD700,000 in technical assistance) and the Rajasthan Urban Sector Development Investment Program in India (USD150 million loan). Of the proposed projects, 17 are technical assistance projects and 30 are loans.

    — Institutional development: the ADB currently has a cross-regional Urban Community of Practice (UCOP) focusing on the urban sector. In 2001, the Bank was reorganised and urban sector expertise was re-distributed throughout other sectors and became somewhat diluted. The urban sector is addressed under broader themes such as governance and social development and competes for resources in larger groups such as transport or water policy, the latter often traditionally focused on rural areas. The UCOP redresses this previous organisational change somewhat, and has raised the profile of the urban sector within the Bank. The relative influence of urban sector issues declined from 1999 to 2006 but has increased since then.

    — Partnerships: Since 2002, ADB has worked with the Cities Alliance (CA) to support the preparation of certain City Development Strategies and the Cities Without Slums action plan. ADB is supporting the Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities together with the WB. ADB collaborates quite extensively with GTZ. The CDIA is a partnership between ADB and GTZ. ADB and DFID have worked together on country-level initiatives in Kolkata and Madhya Pradesh in India.

    — Human resources: ADB currently have plans to hire 20-30 new staff in 2009, with specific urban-sector expertise, to be based in the Manila office. This is significant as it will approximately double its urban specialists.

2.  AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (AFDB)

Activities and emphasis of AfDB:

BACKGROUND:

  The AfDB's first Strategic Plan was produced for the 2003-07 period. There was little consideration for the urban sector in this Plan. According to the most recent Annual Report (2007), the 2003-07 period had the Bank's priorities as agriculture and rural development, with greater emphasis being given to water and sanitation in rural and peri-urban areas, and to human capital formation through primary education and health services.

  The justification for this is the fact that, although urbanisation is increasing, Africa is still predominantly rural (although there is obviously a great deal of variation between countries) and suffers from lack of access to very basic services, food and water. The 2008-12 Strategic Plan has a stronger focus on infrastructure as a key priority area, particularly transport, power and ICT.

  There is some sense within the Bank that urban issues will grow in prominence in the next few years, particularly once the Urban Strategy (see below) is finalised. The rate of urbanisation in Africa is significant and increasing. Climate change will have a major impact on urbanisation in Africa; the AfDB anticipate a potential influx of farmers into cities due to lack of water, drought and crop failure.

  Rural-urban linkages have also been identified to be important: farmers currently produce more for export than they do for the burgeoning local urban population so food security and agricultural policies are closely linked to urbanisation and urban policy and planning.

Urban Strategy:

    — The AfDB is currently developing an urban strategy (started in 2008) and aims to complete it, including an action plan and results-based management framework, some time in 2009. There is a draft format but this in not publicly available yet.[38]

    — An urban strategy was prepared in the 1990s but it was not influential in terms of the Bank's activities and is no longer available. The new strategy is intended to be more integrated and actionable.

    — The new draft strategy has identified several "pillars": infrastructure, governance, private sector development and cross-cutting issues (which are gender and climate change). These may change in the final strategy.

Current Work:

    — Currently, AfDB's work in the urban sector mostly takes place under the infrastructure and water departments and does not have an "urban" focus as such. There are few urban poverty or slum upgrading projects.

    — The AfDB estimates that urban work accounts for 15-20% of its portfolio, mostly in water and infrastructure. They anticipate that the strategy, when it comes in to effect, will increase this proportion but there is no firm target.

    — There is no dedicated urban department, and no plan to create one.

    — There is a sense within the Bank that urban issues are now getting more attention. In particular, there is a greater focus on urban poverty.

Some projects that the AfDB has/is supporting include:

  Ghana Urban Poverty Reduction Project: Began in 2005 and is on-going. This project is aimed at achieving MDG 1 on eradicating extreme poverty and hunger and focuses on economic development and job creation.

  Shelter-Afrique (approved February 2009): A USD 30 Million Line of Credit (LOC) and a USD 7.5 Million equity investment will be provided to Shelter-Afrique. The LOC will be used for on-lending to private real estate developers and housing finance companies to finance housing projects and related infrastructure services. The equity investment will strengthen Shelter-Afrique's capital base. In addition, a Technical assistance grant of USD 0.95 million will be provided by the ADB-managed Fund for African Private Sector Assistance (FAPA), a trust fund established by contributions from the Government of Japan to finance capacity building activities. Shelter-Afrique is a pan-African housing finance and development institution established in 1981 by African governments, the AfDB, Africa-Reinsurance Co. and Commonwealth Development Corporation Group (CDC), to mobilise funds and support provision of sustainable housing in Africa.

3.  UNDP

Activities and emphasis of UNDP:

    — The UNDP has few activities that are clearly linked to the urban sector. Its current Annual Report (2008) makes little mention of cities and none at all of slums.

    — Under the category of Democratic Governance: decentralisation, local governance and urban/rural development, expenditures from 2004-07 are reported to be USD 990 million.

    — UNDP tends to channel its support through groups like UN-HABITAT and the UN Millennium Project (which published a report, A Home in the City. Report of the Task Force on Improving the Lives of Slum Dwellers in 2005) and through its country programmes.

    — UNDP has a strong research and poverty reduction/achieving the MDGs approach but it is not very strongly or comprehensively focused on the urban sector in terms of overall strategy. It is not known if there are any clear plans to change this but there are no obvious signs that there are.

Some projects that the UNDP has supported in the past include:

  Philippines: A series of interventions in the Philippines which established a citizens' watch for monitoring progress towards achieving the MDGs at the city level. These MDG-focused projects have raised awareness among city bureaucrats and the citizens at large to marshal efforts towards MDG achievement. The initiatives promoted collaboration among departments in planning and delivering basic services to meet the MDG targets in 13 cities across the country. These cities' laws, ordinances and policies were improved to make them more responsive to the MDGs, human rights and gender. The projects ultimately improved access to public goods and services for poor and disadvantaged groups. The success drivers included poverty profiles and development baselines (which form the basis for setting local MDG targets), twinning cities with local resource institutions, and knowledge-based constituency feedback mechanisms that made the local government units more accountable. The model has been documented and is being disseminated throughout the Philippines. (Source: 2008 Annual Report).

  Urban Management Programme: The UMP was one of the largest global technical assistance programmes in the urban sector. It started in 1986 and was a joint undertaking of UNDP, UN-HABITAT and the World Bank. The programme worked to develop and apply urban management knowledge in participatory urban governance, alleviation of urban poverty and urban environmental management, and facilitate the dissemination of this knowledge at the city, country, regional and global levels. It was a ten-year programme ending in 2006 and was primarily carried out by UN-HABITAT.

  City Development Strategies: The UMP has implemented City Development Strategies in several cities to further improve the capacity of municipal authorities to implement participatory management mechanisms. These cities include Bamako, Mali; Cuenca, Ecuador; Colombo, Sri Lanka; Johannesburg, South Africa; Santo Andre, Brazil; Shenyang, China; Tunis, Tunisia and cities in the Lake Victoria Region namely, Kampala, Uganda; Kisumu, Kenya; and Musoma, Tanzania.

4.  OTHER DONORS

Activities and emphasis of other donors:

  Other donors identified to have a commitment to working on urban issues include SIDA, Germany (through GTZ, KfW and BTZ), SDC (Switzerland), AusAID, Japan, Spain and France. The most prominent are probably SIDA, and the German government, which tends to focus on environment and infrastructure.

  SIDA (Sweden)—a strong urban poverty focus, particularly in Africa (its work in Asia has been reduced in recent years although it has been supporting the CDIA). SIDA did have a dedicated urban development department but this has been dispersed throughout other departments. According to its own documents, SIDA's priorities in the urban sector are: urban development; infrastructure and local services; land and housing, and environmental sustainability but it is one of the few donors with a reputation for also focusing on urban poverty reduction and slum upgrading. Some projects undertaken by SIDA in recent years include: Housing credit schemes and slum improvement programmes in Central America, Africa and Asia; supporting sustainable urban development in Bangladesh where the strategy for development cooperation includes a particular urban development strategy, and a long-term programme on housing in South African cities.

  Germany (BMZ, GTZ, KfW)—German government support to the urban sector had waned and then been revived in recent years. Through GTZ, direct focus on the urban sector is funneled through the Governance theme (Urban and Municipal Development sub-theme). GTZ is a co-sponsor (with the ADB) of the CDIA. Other themes, such as Environment and Infrastructure also relate to the urban sector. There is not a major urban poverty reduction approach. BMZ supports the urban sector through GTZ, KfW and various NGOs.

  SDC—the SDC's focus on the urban sector has diminished in recent years and its activities are limited at the moment. At one stage, it was quite actively involved in the urban sector (through, for example, support to urban governance in Vietnam, co-sponsoring Cities Alliance cities in preparing City Development Strategies). Currently they have few projects directly in the urban sector although a project in Georgia works to build social housing for internally displaced persons, and provide community support.

  AusAID—AusAID work focuses mainly on urban infrastructure.

Spain—Spain appears to be newly focusing on the urban sector. They recently gave support to the CDIA.

  Agence francaise de developpement (AFD)—the AFD has a strategic focus on cities in francophone countries and former French colonial cities (such as Hanoi and Luang Prabang). As of a 2006 strategy document, it noted that the importance of the urban sector was expected to increase gradually. AFD is particularly known to support culture and heritage projects in cities, in addition to its focus on infrastructure, environment and services. Some examples of AFD projects include: urban upgrading in Haiti, Cities Without Slums, Morocco and Tunis subway line extension. They are also currently supporting a consultant to assist the AfDB to develop its urban strategy.

  Japan (JICA, JBIC)—Japan is strongly focused on infrastructure and environment, working mostly in the Asia region.



37   These numbers were given by an ADB urban sector specialist but it is not known how they were calculated or what is included as "urban". The point the ADB person was trying the make is that both focus and funding are increasing. The USD2 billion figure is not an official target. Back

38   An AfDB staff member kindly gave the author of this paper a briefing on what the strategy was likely to include. The draft itself is not being circulated outside of the Bank yet. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 22 October 2009