Urbanisation and Poverty - International Development Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)

ABOUT RICS

  RICS provides the world's leading qualification for professional standards in land, property and construction, with over 100,000 professionals based in some 100 countries.

  Established in 1868, RICS is a Royal Charter professional body, acting in the public interest: setting and upholding the highest standards of excellence and integrity; and providing impartial, informed advice on the big issues for society, governments and business, worldwide.

  With some 200 specialisms, the profession covers the whole lifecycle of land, property and construction, and the associated environmental issues: from land information management and measurement; through planning, environmental impact assessment and investment appraisal; to managing the construction process to ensure cost effectiveness, transparency and building quality; and advising on the most efficient use of buildings.

1.  Poverty reduction, capacity building and disaster management: the role of professional skills

  Professional skills in land, property and construction are only just beginning to be fully recognised in these fields. We would welcome the opportunity to work with the Select Committee and with DFID to raise awareness of the range of skills on offer; build local capacity; and promote a wider understanding of the fundamental importance of a properly functioning land, property and construction market for any successful or developing economy.

  The World Bank has estimated the value of land and real estate at up to 70% of global wealth. In mature, sophisticated economies this value is realised and its importance as a mainstay of any successful economy is recognised. But in poor countries this value remains locked up—what Hernando de Soto has called "dead capital." Land ownership may be impossible to prove in the absence of a proper legal framework or land registration system. The necessary financial services infrastructure cannot operate in these circumstances. Even if micro-finance/insurance could begin to be contemplated, the absence of effective building control, project management, cost control, international valuation and measurement standards, etc. deters inward investors. And of course there would need to be enough trained professionals to apply these standards.

  RICS is making a contribution to the spread of international professional standards and building local capacity; but there is much more to be done in some of the poorest countries, particularly in Africa. We are keen to explore how we could work with DFID to develop indigenous professional capacity, and with national and local governments, to help to establish the pillars of an effective land and built environment sector in such countries.

2.  The role of surveyors in relation to urbanisation and poverty

  RICS is a member of the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), which has recently published a report entitled Informal Settlements: The Road Towards More Sustainable Places.[196] This states that the role of surveyors within informal settlements is to:

    — Facilitate decision making that combines the economics of land development with the use of land, in a spatial and social context

    — Seek to deliver plots for people to build their homes.

  The report goes on to argue that this can be achieved by utilising the skills of surveyors to:

    — Improve the living environments of people in informal settlements

    — Create the conditions for lasting economic and social success through partnership working

    — Use the most effective methods to achieve economic and social prosperity

    — Build an energetic and open profession committed to working with others.

  Both the FIG report and RICS recognise the fundamental importance of UN Millennium Development Goal 7, in particular the need to ensure access to safe drinking water, and generally bring about an improvement in the lives of slum dwellers.

3.  Government action on land use: the pillars of a successful urban environment

  All governments face difficulties in controlling and changing land use within rapidly expanding cities. Only governments are able to put in place and provide the basic infrastructure that will allow cities to flourish. There are six essential actions for governments:[197]

    — Provide a sound legal basis for the ownership and occupation of property

    — Provide accessible means of enforcing contracts and resolving disputes

    — Set up and run land registries to facilitate and guarantee transfers of property interests

    — Establish physical planning and building regulations to control development and use land for the public good

    — Manage the public sector's own operational land and property

    — Institute and operate a fair land and property tax system.

  Even with such systems in place, as Professor Saad Yahya FRICS has noted: "While the law and official regulations are a pre-requisite, enforcement also has to be influenced by community-led norms and rules of behaviour."[198]

  A significant obstacle to effective land use and housing in many developing countries is the lack of planning, implementation and management capacities within governments. An essential part of this system must be the release of a sufficient amount of land to cope with the housing requirements of an expanding population within an urban area. However, urbanisation can occur so quickly that it is difficult to deliver this land. To address this in the future, governments and communities must work together to ensure land is available.

  If the relevant government does not provide sufficient land for housing development then demand from population growth in cities can only be met by informal settlements. Ensuring there is effective land use planning to provide plots for housing development should be a central aim for governments in countries where informal settlement is a problem, and DFID should help to establish this approach, drawing on professional expertise.

4.  Case study: Morogoro, Tanzania

  A recent research report carried out by Ardhi University in Tanzania and funded by the RICS Education Trust looked at the impact of peripheral land acquisition on indigenous communities' livelihood in the area around the Uluguru mountains in Tanzania. The inability of the government to supply a significant amount of surveyed land for housing development has led to informal land transactions predominating in the area. This is compounded by a lack of knowledge and support regarding the legal framework for property transactions and the prevailing land law.

  The report argues that: "Land-related conflicts were common in most of the study wards and they were related to competition for the scarce resource, and the failure of the government to provide enough plots for the growing population. Conflicts between individuals and the government were related to disagreement over the implementation provisions of the land acquisition legislation, which was partly caused by the low education levels and ignorance of the law of the majority of the people."[199]

5.  Effective property rights

  One of the consequences of rapid urbanisation has been that the most vulnerable people in certain societies have been placed in conflict with formal laws, simply to ensure their basic survival. It is often assumed that access to informal settlements is free, but often a fee has to be paid to a middleman before they can live in a particular area. This person then controls the settlement and those living there are under constant threat of eviction.

  An effective land registration system can help people have security without worrying about eviction, and encourage investment. In many cases land registration in the developing world covers only 30% of the country.[200] Without effective controls there is a risk that slum upgrading will not happen and there may be increased corruption. If societies become used to working off-register and illegally, it will become normal practice. To help prevent this happening there must be an effective system of land registration established, which should be based around the following three principles:

    — Information identifying those people who have interests in parcels of land.

    — Information about those interests eg nature and duration of rights, restrictions and responsibilities.

    — Information about the parcels eg their location, size, improvements and value.

  Rights to the title of a parcel of land will provide both individuals and businesses with the reassurance they need to utilise an area and its resources. Land registration can also give the confidence in security of tenure that is essential for governments to provide the incentive to poorer communities to implement effective housing and planning policies.

  When looking at land rights it is important to examine the role of women in the system, as they can be excluded from ownership through customary rules and laws of inheritance. While it is important to take into account cultural traditions, changes to the system must not simply entrench existing inequalities. Providing women with better access to land can bring economic and social benefits to families and communities.

  DFID should be aiming to help establish land registration systems in all developing countries, by working alongside professionals such as chartered surveyors who can provide expert advice, particularly through the UK Land Registries (which are already involved in capacity building in some countries) and indigenous experts.

6.  Case study: Capacity building in land administration in Swaziland

  Land registration was a key component of institutional reform in Swaziland, to increase organisational capacity for land administration. Before 1995 the UK Government provided long term support for the Swaziland Surveyor General's Department, and following his retirement the opportunity was taken for major reform. This reform was carried out by two expatriate technical cooperation officers and a number of short term consultancy appointments. This approach successfully improved the department, and by 1999 it was able to operate without expatriate assistance.

  One of the key outputs of this work was support for the completion of a cadastral or land registration database, alongside the implementation of digital map revision systems.[201]

7.  Infrastructure development

  The haphazard development which characterises informal settlement often means that it is not connected in to infrastructure such as water, sewage, roads and public transport.[202] This can be a particular problem when settlements are located in unsuitable environments such as hillsides which increase the cost of infrastructure connections.

  Alongside planning for house plots, governments must also make provision for their connection to infrastructure in order to improve quality of life. Action must be focused on providing infrastructure and services to upgrade and regenerate existing settlements. Upgrading work such as this must involve the whole community and protect the natural environment. This type of work must be able to proceed without bureaucratic delays that can lead to excessive costs.

  In many cases infrastructure development has not been able to keep pace with rapid economic growth or urbanisation. Closing this infrastructure gap now needs to be a priority for action. Costs of infrastructure development will act as a barrier to this work taking place. It may be the case that the public sector cannot necessarily be relied upon to supply and maintain this infrastructure and better use could be made of private capital and management skills. The growth of Public Private Partnerships as a tool for private sector investment could help increase the provision of energy, pipelines, telecommunications and water.

  Both the public and private sectors in the UK have experience of working with PPPs and PFI, and this experience could be shared globally. Both DFID and UK Trade and Investment could provide assistance, and construction firms and banks from the UK could be involved in any arrangements.

8.  Case study: Water Supply in Gaza

  The supply of water is essential, and achieving this effectively is an enduring issue in all parts of the world. Areas with little rainfall, low water tables and high temperatures face particular problems which can be made worse by difficult economic, social and political conditions. Research carried out for RICS[203] has examined the use of treated effluent to recharge natural water supplies and supply water for irrigation. This has been happening in Gaza since 2000 and has allowed the Palestinian Water Authority (PWA) to free up much needed natural water for human consumption.

  The research shows that Gaza uses around 164 million m3 of water per year but total supply to the aquifer from which it draws most of its water is only 122 million m3, a shortfall of around 42 million m3 per year. Wastewater recycling could add 60 million m3 per year, according to the PWA. This water can be provided for irrigation more cheaply than other sources of water, benefitting the farmers that use it. The cost of 1 m3 is $0.037, compared with the $0.5 that farmers are currently paying. Farmers questioned for the research suggested that they would be willing to pay up to $0.14 per m3.

  For the scheme to work more effectively, and be transferred to other countries, there needs to be adequate investment in facilities, a reliable source of power, a well trained workforce and a stable political environment.

9.  Ensuring partnership working

  If steps to deal with urbanisation and poverty are to be effective then it will be essential to work with the communities that will be affected by changes. Stakeholder participation will be essential at all stages, including design, implementation and management. One situation where this approach will need to be taken is when informal settlements are built on traditional lands. This has the potential to cause conflict between chief owners or heads of families, and formal legal and administrative structures. Governments need to establish a dialogue with the relevant groups on how these two systems can interact, to ensure that in the future land is fairly released for housing development.

  The FIG report Informal Settlements: The Road Towards More Sustainable Places suggests a number of ways in which partnership working can be promoted. Steps include:

    — Training of local communities and their leadership on land management activities.

    — Assessing householders' potential to contribute to upgrading costs and the options available to them.

    — Establishing the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.

    — Integrating local, grass-roots institutions in infrastructure, management and training.

    — Bringing together disparate inter-professional disciplines that contribute to the development of informal settlements.

10.  Introducing effective building standards

  Many building codes in countries with informal settlements originated during colonial periods and were often inappropriate for local environments, particularly in Africa. In many cases these regulations have remained unchanged.

  One of the main barriers to effective building standards is the private and incremental construction of most slum housing. If professionals and contractors are not involved in the process, then there is likely to be less knowledge of standards and good construction practices. There may also be problems with enforcement if effective government frameworks are not in place.

  Despite these barriers there is a real need to have some control over the use of materials, to ensure factors such as health and safety and ecological issues are being considered. DFID attention should be focused on assisting countries to put in place building standards which are appropriate to local environments. These must also take into account how homes are built and look at what building materials are available locally. Chartered surveyors could provide expertise to help this process, (and for example, are currently working on developing building codes in Haiti—see below.)

10.  Disaster management and development—RICS Commission on Major Disaster Management

  Following the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004, RICS established a Presidential Commission to address how the surveying profession could do more to help vulnerable communities, particularly after they had been affected by a disaster. The Commission comprises chartered surveyors and other built environment professionals with a wealth of experience in disaster management and international development. Since then the Commission has advised Governments, humanitarian NGOs, the World Bank and UN agencies; and has worked with the World Economic Forum on guidelines for private sector involvement in humanitarian action.

11.  The gap between relief and reconstruction

  Reports from chartered surveyors working in Sri Lanka and other countries hit by the tsunami indicated an apparent "gap" between the immediate humanitarian relief phase, and large scale reconstruction. The Commission asked the University of Westminster to investigate this anecdotal evidence, and test it against analysis of the experience following earlier major disasters.

  The resulting report "Mind the Gap! Post-disaster reconstruction and the transition from humanitarian relief"[204] found overwhelming evidence of a gap—in funding, management and delivery—between short term, largely effective, humanitarian relief; and permanent reconstruction, which is "often inefficiently managed, uncoordinated and slow to get off the ground." Survivors of major disasters too often spend years in unsatisfactory, temporary shelters, as the focus of aid, effort and media attention moves on to the next disaster.

12.  Managing the process to build back better

  It is axiomatic that disasters hit the poor hardest. The trauma and continuing risks faced by survivors are hugely increased by the world's lack of a framework for managing the disaster cycle. One of the few good things to come out of disasters is the opportunity to "build back better". In the context of slums, it is a catastrophic method of "slum clearance", but nevertheless provides a golden opportunity to improve living conditions and the safety of millions. But that opportunity is too often missed, or comes too late for the affected communities. Aid is often wasted through a lack of professional project and cost management. The University of Salford is about to publish a generic Disaster Management Process Protocol[205] (Consultative Draft attached) which we hope will improve the effectiveness of disaster risk reduction and recovery, including long term reconstruction, and take full advantage of opportunities to build back better, and for local capacity building.

  We have learned from extensive discussions with various UN agencies, the World Bank, and major charities, that built environment skills are too little recognised in the disaster management world, and they have asked for the assistance of our Commission, our profession and the other built environment professions with whom we work closely, to help at both a strategic planning level, and on the ground. We have produced, in conjunction with other professional bodies in the sector, a guide to the built environment professions in disaster risk reduction and response, for humanitarian agencies.[206]

13.  BuildAction

  The RICS BuildAction initiative, which has just been launched, places built environment projects for disaster response and risk reduction with member firms who supply professional services pro bono to the humanitarian sector organisation or government funding the project. Current and planned BuildAction projects include:

    — Working with the Mumbai Municipality and the World Bank-funded Earthquakes and Megacities Initiative on a Disaster Management Plan to protect Mumbai's 15 million inhabitants;

    — a chartered quantity surveyor working on a key project for DFID on Construction Sector Transparency;

    — a working group of RICS members in the Caribbean addressing the lack of building codes in disaster-prone Haiti;

    — a cost and production feasibility analysis of low cost, low carbon building blocks to reduce disaster risk in Uganda (with The Good Earth Trust);

    — supporting UNICEF's global initiative on risk reduction through its Safer Schools programme, with a pilot project in Rwanda.

  Other examples of chartered surveyors working on a variety of projects covering international aid, development and disaster recovery include disaster recovery work for DFID in Monserrat, a school construction project in Khartoum, a UN Habitat review of tribal and colonial land rights in East Africa, and mapping refugee camps in Gaza.

  We have held discussions with DFID on various aspects of this work, and would welcome opportunities to further this relationship.







196   http://www.fig.net/pub/figpub/pub42/figpub42_A4_web.pdf Back

197   Land and Property Economics report for RICS Foundation and the UN ECE Real Estate Advisory Group, 2000, Supported by the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Back

198   Unmaking the slums: emerging rules, roles and repertoires, Saad S. Yahya, Stetson Law Review, 2006. Back

199   The impact of peripheral urban land acquisition on indigenous communities' livelihood and environment around Uluguru mountains Tanzania, Moses Mpogole and Sophia Kongela, Ardhi University, RICS Education Trust http://www.rics.org/Newsroom/Researchandreports/Researcharchive/mpogole_160309_research.html Back

200   Improving Access to Land and Shelter, Clarissa Augustinus, UN Habitat, 2009 http://www.fig.net/pub/fig_wb_2009/papers/nxt/nxt_augustinus.pdf Back

201   Building Institutional and Organisational Capacity for Land Administration, Iain Greenway MRICS, FIG 2009. Back

202   Coping with Rapid Urban Growth, David Satterthwaite, RICS Leading Edge Series, RICS 2002. Back

203   Opportunities and obstacles in artificially recharging groundwater with effluent: a case study of Gaza, Sami Hamdan, Palestinian Water Authority, RICS FiBRE Series http://www.rics.org/NR/rdonlyres/7930334E-214B-42D3-8838-4ECD6EA3D343/0/Theuseofeffluenttorechargegroundwater.pdf Back

204   Lloyd-Jones, Max Lock Centre, University of Westminster. RICS, 2006 The Commission. Back

205   Generic Disaster Management and Reconstruction Process Protocol (Consultative Guide), University of Salford Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment, RICS, 2009. Back

206   The Built Environment Professions in Disaster Risk Reduction and Response-a guide for humanitarian agencies, Max Lock Centre, University of Westminster, 2009. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 22 October 2009