Written evidence
submitted by Christian Solidarity Worldwide
About Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW)
1. CSW is a
human rights non-governmental organisation, established in the United Kingdom
in 1979, which specialises in religious freedom, works on behalf of those
persecuted for their Christian beliefs and promotes religious liberty for
all. We exist to redress the injustice faced by those who are
discriminated against or persecuted on religious grounds, to champion human
rights and to stand in solidarity with the oppressed. In much of our work
we address broader human rights issues that affect all people regardless of
their religion, working with people of all faiths or none.
Introduction
2. This
submission follows CSW's participation in the 2008 DFID consultation on its new
Nepal Country Assistance Plan, two submissions to DFID, and a meeting with its Kathmandu office in January 2009. During the same visit, CSW staff also met the
then Minister for Administration, Pampha Bhusal and the then Minister for Law
and Constitution, Dev Gurung, and many of the issues discussed with them are
directly relevant to the terms of this inquiry.
Each of the core issues to be considered in the inquiry are addressed in
turn.
DFID's support for governance and
state-building
3. Minister
Pampha Bhusal highlighted the following areas which the UK government, including DFID could support in Nepal:
· The peace
process;
· The smooth
functioning of the coalition government;
· The
process of finalising the new constitution;
· The
restructuring of Nepal
into a federal state;
· The
integration of the Maoist People's Liberation Army (PLA) into the state
security services.
4. Minister
Bhusal expressed the view that there is a vital need to restructure the civil
service and tackle corruption. The civil
service in Nepal,
staffed by the old ruling class, could be a significant blockage to
progress. She expressed the view that UK government
assistance, both financial and technical, could make a significant impact. The UK
government could therefore make a clear difference to the success of Nepal's
coalition government. It would be
helpful for the Select Committee to inquire as to whether and how DFID could
make useful contributions in these areas.
How DFID works with the Foreign Office and
the Ministry of Defence to support the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and
Security Sector Reform
5. CSW asked
DFID whether any help was being offered to the government of Nepal on the issue of rehabilitation of child
soldiers and the integration of the Maoist PLA in the Nepal security
services. These are vital components of
the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. The release and rehabilitation of child
soldiers has now started. CSW was
informed that UN Peace Funding was ready to help when the release of child
soldiers began. DFID might usefully make
additional contributions in this area.
6. Minister Dev
Gurung stated that the concern should not only be for child soldiers but for
the rehabilitation of all disqualified by age or physical disability who must
leave the PLA. DFID could offer further
support for the full range of rehabilitation required in this process.
7. CSW
understands from meeting officials at the British Embassy in Kathmandu, that
the UK
is giving technical support to the Army Integration Special Committee (AISC),
which is concerned with civilian oversight of the armed forces and their
reform. It would be useful to inquire
about the nature of the technical support which the UK has offered and whether DFID is
involved.
8. Minister Dev
Gurung made clear that integration of armed forces is not simply a matter of
inserting PLA soldiers into the existing Nepal Army and security services, but
of a complete restructuring to ensure a full representation of all tribes and
castes in the national security services.
It would be very relevant to consider further ways of supporting the
government of Nepal through
this fraught and controversial process, especially in light of the UK's recent experience in Northern Ireland.
Donor coordination in support of greater
peace-building
9. CSW has
raised with DFID the central issue of how the UK
could help Nepal
to develop into a peaceful multi-faith secular state. There is a danger of
religiously-motivated violence proliferating in Nepal. Recent incidents such as the bomb which
exploded in the Dhobighat Catholic Church in May 2009 indicate very clearly the
danger of a Hindu extremist backlash against recent developments such as the
declaration of a secular multi-faith state and the abolition of the Hindu
monarchy.
10. It would be
pertinent to inquire as to whether DFID might have a role in building a
peaceful multi-faith state, and how it might work to encourage religious
co-operation and harmony. CSW and its
partner organisation, the National Council of Churches of Nepal (NCCN), have
been involved in the development of the Inter-Religious Peace Group which later
became officially recognized as the Inter-Religious Council (IRC). However, this receives no state funding. CSW has been deeply impressed with the
dedication to active work for peace and harmony amongst the members of this
body, which represents Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, Christians, Baha'is, and
traditional religions, and works under the leadership of a Hindu president and
a Christian vice-president. However, its
work would benefit considerably from significant external funding.
11. CSW would
recommend the work of IRC, to build peace and co-operation between religious
groups, as being worthy of DFID funding within its peace-building mandate. So far, DFID has not been involved or working
in this area. However, DFID could lead a
number of donors in funding a peace-building programme, into which UK experience from Northern
Ireland and mainland UK
in inter-faith co-operation could also be of considerable help to Nepal.
DFID's efforts to reduce social exclusion and
inequality, including its work with women
Social exclusion of religious minorities
12. There was
mention in the DFID Nepal Country Assistance Plan of Muslims being one amongst
the excluded groups in Nepal. However, Christians (of whom there are now an
estimated one million in Nepal)
have historically been equally excluded, and large numbers of them are doubly
excluded by virtue of being Dalits or members of 'low' castes. Baha'is are
another socially excluded religious minority.
13. The
overarching aim of addressing social exclusion within the new Nepal should
therefore take account of religious exclusion for all minority faiths. Work for religious liberty and full
recognition of all faiths is very relevant to this issue.
Social exclusion on the basis of caste
14. In meetings
with DFID in Kathmandu, CSW staff raised the
question of how DFID is helping to promote social inclusion for Dalits and
members of 'lower' castes. CSW
recommended that DFID consider supporting the under-funded National Dalit
Commission, and re-consider the decision to end funding for the National Dalit
Federation? DFID has had a long-standing
commitment to helping Dalits realise their rights under the Enabling State Programme,
but the reasons for the ending of funding to the National Dalit Federation were
not explained.
Social exclusion and education
15. Education,
particularly that of girls, is rightly recognised by both the government of Nepal and by
DFID as a crucial issue. Minister Pampha
Bhusal had a deep commitment to the rapid development of underprivileged girls
in Nepal
education. Nationally, many fewer girls
than boys complete secondary education, since girls have been given much less
priority and status within the family.
In discussions with the minister, political and social objectives for
the urgent issue of the advancement of women and girls in Nepal were
considered. CSW has been heavily
involved in the education of Nepali girls from illiterate and 'low'-caste
families for the past fifteen years. The
building and development of Solidarity
International Academy
at Hetauda has been funded by CSW. At
this independent school, free places for 250 'low'-caste girls has been a
priority.
16. It is clear
that DFID and other EU partners provide a large proportion of the funding for
the state education system in Nepal,
which is most commendable. However, most Nepali education experts are aware
that the state system is not generally able to provide education of a
comparable standard to that provided by the independent schools. CSW recommends that DFID fosters a
constructive dialogue with the government of Nepal on the issue of developing
access to free education, particularly for girls.
|