Appendix 2: The work of the Scrutiny Unit
in 2007-08
Overview
1. The main aim of the Committee Office Scrutiny
Unit is to maintain and improve the ability of the House, through
its select committees, to perform its scrutiny function. In particular:
- it supports select committees
and others within the House, mainly but not exclusively in the
areas of government expenditure, performance reporting and pre-legislative
scrutiny
- it provides staff for joint committees of both
Houses on draft bills
- it supports the evidence-taking functions of
Public Bill Committees.
In fulfilling its role, it seeks to develop expertise
and best practice and improve the quality of its work by developing
relationships with relevant organisations outside the House.
2. In 2007-08 the Unit maintained its usual high
level of activity. All the departmental select committees made
use of the Unit's services at some point during the session and
Unit staff also carried out tasks in support of the wider work
of the House. Much of the work undertaken by the Unit concerned
the scrutiny of expenditure and performance - a core activity
is the regular analysis of the Government's financial reporting
to Parliament. The Unit has also played an important role in assisting
committees - especially joint committees - in their examination
of draft Bills. However, once again Unit staff undertook a considerable
volume of other tasks in support of committees. This was partly
owing to the fact that work on draft bills was heavily concentrated
into a few months of the session, allowing us to direct resources
to other tasks at less busy times.
3. Several committees have commented on the value
they place on assistance from the Unit. For instance, the Public
Administration Committee notes:
We have continued to benefit from significant support
from the Scrutiny Unit of the House of Commons in our analyses
of expenditure and administration issues and would like once again
to express our gratitude for their expertise and assistance[193]
The Work and Pensions Committee also referred to
the Unit's "invaluable support" in its financial scrutiny
work, and the Transport Committee noted that it was "most
grateful" for the Unit's assistance in supporting its inquiry
work, as well as financial scrutiny.[194]
Division of staff time
4. Scrutiny Unit staff record the number of tasks
they undertake for each committee, the time spent on each task
and the broad category into which they fallexpenditure-related
tasks, scrutiny of draft bills or "other". ("Other"
includes work in support of Public Bill Committees.) It should
be noted that this division of staff time provides only a rough
estimate. For instance, each day is treated as equal, even though
this may not accurately reflect patterns of work, as, at times
of peak activity, staff work long hours and this additional time
is not captured in the statistics. In the same vein, it should
be noted that a "task" can be a short piece of analysis
taking only a few hours or assistance to a joint committee on
a draft Bill lasting several weeks or months.
5. In broad terms, almost half of Scrutiny Unit
staff time was spent on expenditure-related tasks, 25% on draft
bills, and 28% on "other" activities, as shown in Figure
1 below.
6. The variation in the Unit's workload over
the course of the session is shown in Figure 2 below.
7. Work on draft bills peaks in July, reflecting
the fact that draft legislation is now habitually published in
the spring, with a burst of pre-legislative scrutiny by joint
committees supported by the Unit taking place in the run-up to
the Summer Recess. On the other hand, the intensity of work on
financial scrutiny tends to be more constant over the year.
8. The way in which the Unit's resources are
deployed has changed since it was established in November 2002.
Figure 3 below shows, for instance, how expenditure and "other"
tasks have increased in importance since the 2003-04 session (the
first for which details are available).
9. The change in types of work mainly reflect
the variation in the numbers of draft bills published by the Government
each session (see Annex for numbers of draft bills published since
session 1997-98) and the increase in the range and volume of tasks
undertaken by Unit staff, such as supporting Public Bill Committees.
10. Scrutiny Unit staff undertook tasks for each
of the departmental select committees, although there was some
variation in the extent to which committees used the Unit's services.
The Justice Committee made most use of the Unit's staff. This
is to be expected, given the role of the Unit's home affairs/public
policy analyst in supporting this committee and the Home Affairs
Committee. The other two highest users were the Treasury Committee
and the Transport Committee.
Staffing of the Unit
11. The Unit's staff complement in session 2007-08
comprised: two legal specialists, a statistician on secondment
from the House of Commons Library, two financial analysts on secondment
from the National Audit Office and two from Government departments,
an economist and a Home Affairs/Public Policy Specialist. In addition,
there was a core team of the Head of Unit and two Deputy Heads
(Finance and Legislation), an assistant clerk (attached to the
Unit, but not part of the formal complement), a senior committee
assistant, a team manager, two committee assistants, a part-time
committee support assistant and an office support assistant. (The
Assistant Clerk post was not continued beyond October 2008, as
the postholder was deployed elsewhere in the Committee Office
in response to business needs.) The Unit has also continued to
host a series of ESRC student interns on three-month placements.
12. As noted in last year's report on the work
of the Unit, two of the additional staff were appointed in 2007
in response to specific business requirements: the part-time office
clerk post, dealing mainly with evidence-taking by Public Bill
Committees, and the public policy analyst post, working for the
Home Affairs Committee and the Justice Committee. The new administrative
post has been essential in handling the extra workload arising
from Public Bill Committees. During periods when PBCs have been
less active, she has proved a useful additional resource for the
Unit's support of joint and select committees. Although in the
event there was less legislation than expected in the home affairs
and justice fields, the public policy analyst post appointment
has helped the Justice and Home Affairs Committees manage a heavy
workload, exacerbated by some staff shortages. We expect more
legislative scrutiny in this area in the 2008-09 session, in which
the public policy analyst will be involved.
Financial scrutiny work for select committees
13. The Unit continues to support Select Committees
in their core tasks of examining departmental expenditure (core
task 5) and examining performance against key targets in the Public
Service Agreements (core task 6). The finance team provided briefing
for committees on the Main and Supplementary Estimates (including
analysis of departments' estimates memoranda), resource accounts,
Autumn Performance Reports and Departmental Annual Reports (DARs)
of all the major Government departments. This year, for the first
time, all the departmental select committees held evidence sessions
on their departments' DARs, and the Unit provided briefing for,
and otherwise supported, many of those hearings. We also provided
briefing for the Work and Pensions Committee's hearings on the
DWP Autumn Performance Report and Three Year Plan, in March and
April 2008.
14. We contributed to the drafting of committee
reports on DARs and Estimates. For instance, the Unit assisted
with the drafting of the Transport Committee's report on the Department
of Transport DAR, and with briefing for the subsequent Estimates
Day debate, and with the Defence Committee's reports on the MoD
Estimates. As noted in last year's report, the Unit published
an over-arching review of the 2007 DARs in March 2008, available
at : http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/Departmental%20Reports%20Review%202007.pdf.
We will produce a similar review of the DARs published in 2008.
15. The finance team continues to be particularly
active in its support of the Treasury Committee, although to a
slightly lesser extent than the year before because the Committee
was able temporarily to increase its own staffing levels. The
Scrutiny Unit's assistance included contributing to briefing on
the 2007 Pre-Budget Report, 2008 Budget, the Comprehensive Spending
Review, its inquiries on Estates Management and the move to International
Accounting Standards and PFI accounting. We also assisted with
the drafting of reports on the administration and expenditure
of the Chancellor's departments. The Committee has welcomed the
Unit's 'valuable input'.[195]
16. Other examples of financial scrutiny work
undertaken for committees in 2007-08 include support for the Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs Committee in its examination of Defra's
budget - an instance of the Unit's core function of analysing
departmental annual reports widening to include work on the Department's
wider financial management. The Committee has noted the value
of the Unit's assistance.[196]
We gave presentations, with Library colleagues, to the Scottish
Affairs and Justice Committees on the budgetary controls on the
devolved administrations. We also advised some committees which
had been consulted by their departments about changes to Estimates
structures, and we provided all committees with a high-level analysis
of the Comprehensive Spending Review financial settlement for
their respective departments, at the start of the session.
17. The Unit's statistician, on loan from the
House of Commons Library, assists committees with statistical
analysis and the presentation of statistical information, as well
as contributing to the general scrutiny work of the Unit. The
statistician also takes the lead on analysing the impact assessments
which accompany draft bills. Examples of the statistician's work
in 2007-08 include analysis of recruitment and retention in the
armed forces for the Defence Committee, assistance on analysis
and presentation of information on foundation trust performance
for the Health Committee and advice to the Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs Committee on the interpretation of statistics on
pig meat imports.
Legislative scrutiny
Draft bills
18. Draft Bills are considered by ad hoc Joint
Committees of both Houses or departmental Select Committees (in
pursuit of Core Task 3). In 2007-08, the Government published
nine bills in draft, seven of which received pre-legislative scrutiny.
The Unit provided legal specialists, administrative staff and
its three Clerks to support the two joint committees appointed
to examine the draft Constitutional Renewal Bill and the draft
Marine Bill. As in previous years, the two joint committees were
given a very tight timetable to complete pre-legislative scrutiny,
and thus an intensive workload for members and staff, but they
were nevertheless able to publish their reports on schedule.[197]
Public Bill Committees
19. In the 2007-08 session Public Bill Committees
(PBCs) continued to take written and oral evidence on bills. 12
PBCs took oral evidence during the session, holding a total of
35 evidence sessions, and receiving 164 written submissions.[198]
This represented a significant task for the Unit's administrative
staff, who manage the receipt, checking and circulation of submissions
to Committee members, and make the practical arrangements for
oral evidence sessions. In addition, the Deputy Head (Legislation)
commissioned and edited briefing for those evidence sessions from
specialist staff of select committees, and she also contributed
to the briefing.
Legislative Reform Orders and Legislative Competence
Orders
20. Legal specialists in the Unit have continued
to work with the staff of the Regulatory Reform Committee in its
scrutiny of Legislative Reform Orders (LROs) made under the Legislative
and Regulatory Reform Act 2005. In 2007-08 one of the Unit's legal
specialists prepared briefing for the Committee's inquiry into
the draft Legislative Reform (Insolvency) (Individual Voluntary
Arrangements) Order 2008, which was withdrawn by the Government
shortly after being laid.
21. Under the Government of Wales Act 2006 the
National Assembly for Wales can bring forward proposals which
would extend the Assembly's law-making powers by way of Legislative
Competence Orders in Council (LCOs). The Orders do not themselves
change the general law for Wales - they pave the way for subsequent
changes in the law applying to Wales within the devolved areas
of legislative competence.[199]
The Unit has continued to assist the Welsh Affairs Committee in
its scrutiny of LCOs. In 2007-08, the Unit's legal specialists
and statistician have assisted the Welsh Affairs Committee in
its scrutiny of LCOs on Additional Learning Needs, Domiciliary
Care, Vulnerable Children, Affordable Housing and the Red Meat
industry.
Other work for committees
22. The Scrutiny Unit continued in 2007 to support
committees in areas outside its core specialisms of financial
and legislative scrutiny. This provision of "surge"
capacity has been of particular help to committees faced with
unexpected demands in workload or gaps in their staff complement.
Work was mainly done on a project basis with staff remaining based
in the Unit. For instance, the Assistant Clerk managed inquiries
for the Transport Committee into BAA and into the opening of Terminal
5 at Heathrow, and one of the legal specialists managed the Public
Administration Committee's inquiry into Equitable Life. Unit staff
have also continued to assist committees with online forums in
connection with committee inquiries. Our support mainly consisted
of advice to committee staff on establishing and running forums,
and help with moderating forums. Unit staff have also made more
substantial contributions, notably to the Justice Committee's
forum on domestic violence, in which the Unit's public policy
analyst played a leading role. The Unit has also supported the
House of Commons Web Centre in developing advice and guidance
to committee staff in this area.
Work for the Liaison Committee
23. Unit staff have continued to provide support
for the Liaison Committee's work. In particular, the Unit's finance
team made a significant input to the working group on financial
scrutiny, including contributing to the Committee's report on
Parliament and Government Finance: Recreating Financial Scrutiny.[200]
The Unit is assisting the working group in taking the issues forward,
following the Government's response to the report.
24. The Unit is also supporting the Liaison Committee
and its working group with work on the Government's 'Alignment'
project. This involves bringing the data in the Estimates, departmental
budgets and Resource Accounts closer together, to reduce inconsistencies
between them in the way they present government expenditure. As
part of the Project, the number of financial reporting documents,
falling at different points in the year, may be reduced.
25. The Head of the Unit once again led a small
team from across the Committee Office supporting Liaison Committee
staff in the production of the Committee's annual report on the
work of select committees.
Wider work
26. As in previous years the Unit has carried
out work for customers other than the departmental select committees.
For instance, the Unit supported the Speaker's Committee on the
Electoral Commission in its examination of the Commission's 2008-09
draft Estimate and corporate plan. In its annual report, the Committee
notes that it "is grateful to the Scrutiny Unit for the quality
of its analysis and advice and looks forward to receiving continuing
support from it".[201]
27. Other examples include continued support
for the Parliamentary Observer on the Financial Reporting Advisory
Board (FRAB), providing advice to the UK Delegation when it examined
the draft budget of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and assistance
by Unit's statistician to a departmental working group on transcription
services. The Head of the Unit and the Unit statistician have
also helped establish and run a small informal network of parliamentary
officials which acts as a point of contact for officials of the
recently-established UK Statistics Authority.
Training and sharing best practice
28. The Unit continued the work started in 2006
to help train Government and House staff on pre-legislative scrutiny
of draft bills, and evidence-taking by Public Bill Committees.
This included briefings and presentations to staff of Government
departments, and bilateral meetings. Members of the finance team
have also briefed select committee members on aspects of financial
reporting, e.g. the Estimates process. In March 2008 the Unit
held a seminar for committee staff on the presentation of quantitative
information in committee reports. We are grateful to one of our
ESRC interns, from the department of statistics at the LSE, for
his presentation at the seminar. Unit staff have also taken part
in training events for committee staff on running online forums.
We also produced, and published on our website, an analysis of
the quality of Departmental Annual Reports and a paper on PFI
accounting.
29. International interest in the legislative
and financial scrutiny work of the Unit is reflected in regular
visits by staff and members of overseas legislatures. In 2007-08
Unit staff briefed visitors from Australia, Bahrain, Botswana,
Czech Republic, China, Finland, Guyana, Jersey, Lebanon, Mexico,
Nigeria, Oman and Vietnam.
30. In May 2008 the Unit submitted written evidence
to the review by the Scottish Parliament's Finance Committee of
the Budget Process consultation. The Unit's paper discussed the
extent to which the House of Commons and select committees engage
in scrutinising expenditure plans, and highlighted a number of
current developments which might change the way such scrutiny
is undertaken in Westminster. The submission is available on the
Unit's website.[202]
The future
31. In my previous report, I noted the proposal
from the Review of Select Committee Resources in 2007 that the
Committee Office work towards the establishment of a central Research
Unit, bringing together a broad spectrum of skills and policy
experience, and commented on the possible implications for the
future of the Scrutiny Unit. This proposal has not been adopted,
so it is likely that the Unit will continue to operate broadly
on its present lines. We will continue to work to understand
our customers' needs and tailor our assistance accordingly, including
through informal surveys of committee clerks and monitoring of
feedback received.
32. We will also continue to provide training
to Committee Office colleagues- e.g. on using economics in inquiries,
presentation of statistical data in committee reports, the Treasury's
'Alignment project' and understanding Resource Accounts. The Liaison
Committee, in its 2008 report on financial scrutiny, called on
the Unit to produce a "financial scrutiny training plan"
for Members for 2008-09.[203]
In response to this recommendation, we are planning training events
for Members and their staff, in conjunction with the House of
Commons Library, on the 'Alignment 'Project and on understanding
Resource Accounts. We will arrange further events in the light
of the response we receive.
33. As ever, it is difficult to make definite
predictions about the balance of the Unit's future work, as this
will depend on factors such as the number and timing of draft
bills published by the Government, and how many joint committees
are appointed to scrutinise them, the number of public bill committees
that take evidence and the demands of committees for assistance
("surge capacity") at especially busy times. The creation
of eight regional select committees, a new committee on energy
and climate change and the Speaker's Conference may add to the
overall level of demand from within the Committee Office.
Matthew Hamlyn
Head, Scrutiny Unit
January 2009
Annex: Draft Bills published since Session 1997-1998
Session
| Number of draft bills published
|
1997-98 | 3
|
1998-99 | 6
|
1999-2000 | 6
|
2000-01 | 2
|
2001-02 | 7
|
2002-03 | 91
|
2003-04 | 12
|
2004-05 | 5
|
2005-06 | 42
|
2006-07 | 4
|
2007-08 | 93
|
1 Excludes draft clauses of Gambling Bill since the main part of this draft was published in 2003-04 and is included in that figure
2 Includes draft Terrorism Bill
3 Does not include draft clauses of the Banking Bill published as part of Cm 7459.
|
193 Public Administration Committee, Fourth Report,
Session 2008-09, Work of the Committee in 2007-08, HC 42,
para 17 Back
194
Work and Pensions Committee, First Report of Session 2007-08,
Work of the Committee in 2007-08, HC 68, para 23; Transport
Committee, First Report of Session 2008-09, Work of the Committee
in 2007-08, HC 211, paras 6-8. See also Health Committee,
Second Report of Session 2008-09, Work of the Committee in
2007-08, HC 193, para 10 Back
195
Treasury Committee, Third Report of Session 2008-09, Work of
the Committee, 2007-08, HC 173, para 11 Back
196
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Second Report of
Session 2008-09, The work of the Committee in 2007-08,
HC 95, para 47. See also e.g. Home Affairs Committee, Third Report,
Session 2008-09, Work of the Committee in 2007-08, HC 76,
para 47 Back
197
Aspects of both the draft Marine Bill and the draft Constitutional
Renewal Bill were also subject to pre-legislative scrutiny by
other committees - in the case of the draft Marine Bill, by the
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee and the draft Constitutional
Renewal Bill by the Public Administration Committee and the Justice
Committee Back
198
Figures exclude PBCs on bills introduced in session 2006-07 and
carried over to session 2007-08 Back
199
Second Report from the Welsh Affairs Committee, Session 2007-08,
Proposed Legislative Competence Orders in Council: Additional
Learning Needs, HC 44, para 1 Back
200
Second Report from the Liaison Committee, Session 2007-08, HC
426 Back
201
Speaker's Committee, Second Report 2008: The work of the Committee
in 2008, HC 109, para 20 Back
202
http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/scrutinyunit/reports_pubs.cfm
Back
203
Liaison Committee, Parliament and Government Finance: Recreating
Financial Scrutiny, Second Report, Session 2007-08, HC 426,
para 87 Back
|