Revised Green Book and audit of Members' allowances - Members Estimate Committee Contents



REVISED GREEN BOOK AND AUDIT OF MEMBERS' ALLOWANCES

INTRODUCTION

1.  On 3 July the House debated our report on Members' allowances,[1] which was based on an extensive and detailed review of the allowances. The House agreed with some of our proposals and not others. On 16 July the House tasked the Advisory Panel on Members' Allowances (APMA) with preparing a new version of the Green Book, which sets out the rules on allowances for Members.

REVISED GREEN BOOK

2.  APMA has now completed its work, and we are grateful for the draft it provided. Like APMA itself, we would particularly like to thank its two independent advisers, Keith Bradford nominated by the CBI and Kay Carberry nominated by the TUC, for their contribution. We have made some changes to the draft, mainly on how disputes are to be resolved. We have also responded to a recent report of the Standards and Privileges Committee by including a section on stationery.[2] We are publishing the amended document as Annex 1 to this report. WE COMMEND THE REVISED GREEN BOOK TO THE HOUSE.

3.  The revised Green Book is intended to come into effect on 1 April 2009. There are some discrepancies between the revised Green Book and the existing resolutions of the House. These are listed in Annex 2. If the House approves the revised Green Book, the resolutions will need to be made consistent with it.

AUDIT PROPOSALS AND RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES

4.  On 20 October we asked the Members Estimate Audit Committee (MEAC) to make proposals on the future role of the National Audit Office and the House's internal audit staff in providing audit and assurance of spending on Members' allowances and to report to us. They have now done so, and we thank them for their prompt and thorough examination of these matters. We are publishing their report unamended as Annex 3 to this report. WE ENDORSE MEAC'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON ASSURANCE AND AUDIT, AND COMMEND THEM TO THE HOUSE.

5.  Two further issues arise. MEAC has made proposals in its report for resolving disputes over compliance with the rules and reporting serious failures in compliance, which we have endorsed above. But a mechanism for resolving disagreements about what expenditure is allowable under the rules and setting precedents for future claims is also needed. We decided it was important to separate the function of advising on what the rules should be, which APMA performs, and that of determining how the rules should be interpreted in particular cases. We concluded that the latter task should be given to the Finance and Services Committee. Decisions on what is an acceptable claim would be dealt with in the first instance by officials, and we hope that most disagreements would be resolved at this stage. If that is not possible, the matter could be taken by the Member concerned to the Finance and Services Committee and ultimately on appeal to the Members Estimate Committee. WE RECOMMEND THAT, FOR DISPUTES OVER WHAT IS AN ACCEPTABLE CLAIM WHICH CANNOT BE RESOLVED BETWEEN OFFICIALS AND THE MEMBER CONCERNED, THE MEMBER SHOULD BE ABLE TO ASK THE FINANCE AND SERVICES COMMITTEE TO RULE, AND SHOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF APPEALING TO THE MEMBERS ESTIMATE COMMITTEE. This recommendation and our next would require changes to the House's standing orders.

6.  The revised Green Book is an improvement on its predecessors, but it does not offer sufficient precision and detail to provide the basis for a full-scope audit. It will need to be supplemented by practice notes which give Members and the Department of Resources a clear basis on which to operate the allowances system. A procedure for approving these practice notes will be required. WE RECOMMEND THAT THE PRACTICE NOTES ON MEMBERS' ALLOWANCES, AND ANY SUBSEQUENT CHANGES TO THEM, SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE FINANCE AND SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR APPROVAL.



1   Third Report, 2007-08, Review of Allowances, HC 578. Back

2   Nineteenth Report, 2007-08, Use of pre-paid envelopes and official stationery, HC 1211, para 14. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 15 January 2009