The impact of the current economic situation on the North West and the Government's response - North West Regional Committee Contents


Examination of Witness (Questions 51-59)

MIKE BAKER, PETER JAMIESON AND JOHN KORZENIEWSKI

15 JUNE 2009

  Chairman: Welcome and thank you very much for your written submissions. Eric Martlew will start the questions.

  Q51 Mr Martlew: Can I start on apprenticeships? I hear about all sorts of schemes and initiatives coming from Government. I shall give you an example. I had a phone call on Friday afternoon from a mother who was very distressed and not very happy with the Government—and my Government at that—because her son, who was a 17-year-old apprentice plumber, had been paid off and she could not find anywhere where he could continue his apprenticeship. Is that a general factor across the region? Are initiatives being talked about but nothing is happening? I phoned Jobcentre Plus and was told I had to phone Connexions and somebody else. What is the reality on the ground for apprentices who have been paid off up and down this region about them continuing their training?

  Mike Baker: Can I introduce myself? I am Mike Baker, the Director of Customer Services at Jobcentre Plus, and I started last month. Peter Jamieson, our Regional External Relations Manager, is here to deal with some of the detail. Peter, would you like to deal with that question?

  Peter Jamieson: There is a package of support available as part of the Rapid Response Service for all individuals faced by redundancy. Specifically for apprenticeships, LSC offers support for individuals not currently on apprenticeship programmes but facing redundancy. John, can you continue?

  John Korzeniewski: First, there is no issue in funding apprenticeship places. The issue is the take-up by employers. You described a particular issue we are having to respond to at the minute where youngsters may be laid off as a result of the recession. There are a number of things that we can do. We are setting up employer pools where employers can share. We are setting up college-based provision where youngsters can finish their apprenticeship by doing the last few months—depending on where they are in the system—off the job, as it were. We are aware of the issue and we do have things in place. There is no issue about funding provision; it is about dealing with the individual cases as they come through.

  Q52 Mr Martlew: Can I clarify that? I am using this example. A small employer decided he could not afford it any more. A young lad had done a year and was made redundant. Are you saying there is a guarantee that he will be able to complete his apprenticeship?

  John Korzeniewski: No, I didn't use the word "guarantee" because the issue is about the individual circumstances and the place. What I am saying is that we have schemes in place, which in most cases will be able to deliver what that young person needs. It is difficult to talk specifics without having that in front of me. One route is to allow employers to share apprenticeships; another is to allow providers such as colleges to finish off with that youngster, if they have got so far. We also have schemes where, although we cannot use the word "subsidy", we are able to provide a small amount of funding to help an employer support the costs of employing that person. We do have a range of things in place.

  Q53 Mr Martlew: This is general knowledge out there in the community, is it?

  John Korzeniewski: If you are asking me whether every single employer in these circumstances knows about all of this, then, well, you are quoting an example of an employer who does not, but we are doing our best to ensure that the knowledge does get out there.

  Q54 Mr Martlew: Can I go on more generally now? What effect has the recession had on your workload?

  Mike Baker: To make a general statement and add in some detail. It has had a significant and quite huge effect. In the last 12 months the jobseekers' register has gone up in the North-West by 75%, which is just below the national curve but nevertheless a significant increase. We are still taking vacancies. We take in 35,000 vacancies per month in the North-West, which is below the figures we would have expected last year but they are holding up. An important point within Jobcentre Plus is that typically throughout 2008 we had around 26,000 people coming on to benefit and broadly that number leaving benefit. The figures now are 35,000 leaving the register, so although we have increased our off flows, which is a positive point to make, it has not kept pace with the on flows. Overall, we have responded in three ways. We have recruited people in the North-West, the second biggest region in Jobcentre Plus—we announced in April that we would employ an additional 1,800 staff. We have also looked at how we can maximise the use of our premises. Very importantly, we have looked at our processes, because not only have we had this huge increase, but we have got a very different type of customer coming through and some will be presenting as unemployed for the first time. So, our package of measures has had to change.

  Q55 Mr Martlew: When we had full employment, did the numbers employed in Jobcentre Plus go down? Did the numbers you employ go down?

  Mike Baker: Yes.

  Q56 Mr Martlew: Was that the right policy?

  Mike Baker: Well, in the spending review 2004 we were set the challenge overall—Department for Work and Pensions had a headcount reduction from 130,000 to 100,000. I know that we are now reversing that trend. Whether the policy was right, I'm not sure I'm qualified to say.

  Mr Martlew: Perhaps that was a leading question.

  Q57 Tony Lloyd: There is a real issue here, because if you are recruiting very significant numbers of new people, there is a training issue if you use Jobcentre Plus. The issue for us is how quickly those new people are not simply in post, but in post and useful to my constituents. What is the time scale around which you get proper value out of them?

  Mike Baker: It will clearly vary, depending. A new recruit to Jobcentre Plus—to the civil service—will clearly not be as productive as someone who has been in the Department some time. We are actively ensuring—right across the DWP, to the wider family, if you like—that we are taking staff from across the Department. In fact, we have taken more than 750 staff who have transferred from other Departments. We are also looking at whether we can slim down our support areas, because all of the money that we have been given by the Government has gone directly to front-line staff. There is clearly a learning curve. We are well experienced with training. Last year, with the Employment and Support Allowance, just within the North-West, we trained 1,000 staff within the two-month window. We have actually increased our training support, but clearly we understand that customers who come through our door will often have very difficult stories, and needs that we must meet immediately, so we ensure that we have things like nursery sections and consolidation sections. We are absolutely convinced that the way to support customers coming through the door is to offer a personal service—an individual service—because every customer is different. Without the back-up and training, our staff cannot do that, so it is something that we put a lot of effort into.

  Q58 Tony Lloyd: Without being rude, and bearing in mind that people who come to MPs are people who have a difficult story to tell, obviously from time to time people come along and say that they have had a non-personalised service, and that they have been treated as number 722 for the day. How can we get over that, to make sure that people are properly given something in the end that leaves them in a better position to access the labour market?

  Mike Baker: I was with Barbara Keeley on Friday morning, dealing with one of her constituents—a very sad case, and we had just not given the service. I cannot give Barbara or that constituent or customer the answer that, generally, we get it right, because for that customer we did not. We just have to learn our lessons. Overall, we are meeting all of our targets. I am not just saying this because I am new, but I am proud to work for Jobcentre Plus and I am proud of what the staff are doing. I think we are learning. We have targets that we have to meet, including one target that we call the Customer Service Target, which involves mystery shoppers coming into our business to test how well—or not well—we are doing. We learn lessons from that. But we have had a whole range of new packages introduced, we have had a completely different client base in certain areas, and it is a steep learning curve. It isn't easy, and I appreciate that we don't always get it right.

  Q59 Mr Martlew: Mr Baker, you said that you have 35,000 vacancies a month. What areas of work are they in?

  Mike Baker: They are changing. I shall ask Peter to help with the detail. Probably the most sought-after jobs are in the professional and managerial areas, and those are not where the vast majority of jobs are. There has been an increase in public sector jobs and retail trade is holding up well, particularly in Liverpool. Across the region we have certainly got very different levels of employment and unemployment. Peter, do you want to deal with the sectors?

  Peter Jamieson: One of the growth areas in terms of vacancies notified is, as Mike has pointed out, the public sector. The other growth areas are business administration and retail. Those are the three sectors where we are seeing the majority of vacancies notified. Unfortunately, the vacancies sought by many of our jobseekers are in different occupational areas. We are seeing a high number of people from a professional and executive background, and a high number of manufacturing jobseekers coming on to the market. So there is an issue in terms of the correlation between vacancies sought and vacancies notified, but the majority of vacancies in terms of our growth have been in the retail service sector and the public sector.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 31 July 2009