Electoral Commission: compliance with regulations on funding political parties - Speaker's Committee Contents


Appendix: Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General


Electoral Commission: compliance with regulations on funding political parties



Summary


1.  The Fifth Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life[2] said, "Many members of the public believe that the policies of the major political parties have been influenced by large donors, while ignorance about the sources of funding has fostered suspicion." The Electoral Commission (the Commission) has a key role in ensuring integrity and transparency of party and election finance. In carrying out this role, the Commission has power to investigate potential breaches of the law and to apply sanctions. The Commission was established as an independent body corporate under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (the Act)[3].

2.  The Electoral Commission is responsible for the regulation of the funding of political parties under the Act. This report considers the work of the Commission in the regulation of party finances and how its effectiveness could be enhanced, applying the best practice laid down by recent reports on better regulation and the effective use of sanctions. Part 2 examines the current regime of sanctions; and Part 3 draws comparisons with other regulators.

3.  Figure 1 summarises the main sources of evidence for this report. We have analysed the data submitted to the Commission. We have also reviewed the legislation on the Commission's role as regulator, and ascertained the Commission's existing policies on sanctions; and compared both to overseas Electoral Commissions and other UK regulators.

Figure 1: Our sources of evidence in carrying out this examination
Method Purpose
Analysis of data submitted by Parties To determine the levels of donations; the level of late reporting; the impact of enforcement action and the effectiveness of the Commission as a regulator.
Review of legislation To understand the Commission's role, powers and responsibilities.
Review of the Commission's policies on sanctions To assess consistency and transparency of the Commission's approach and the effectiveness of its strategy.
Review of Overseas Electoral Commissions To compare effectiveness, benchmark the UK Commission and identify best practice.
Review of UK Regulators To compare effectiveness, benchmark the UK Commission and identify best practice.

Key findings

ON THE USE OF SANCTIONS WITHIN THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK:

4.  Sanctions are an important part of any regulatory system, providing both an incentive to ensure compliance and a deterrent. For sanctions to operate effectively, those regulated need to understand clearly what their obligations are.

5.  The regulatory environment in which the Commission works is a complex one. The political parties and other regulated bodies vary in size and structure, from small single issue parties to the larger parties, with seats in Parliament, and a more organised structure. At present, the Commission's enforcement tools are a limited range of fines and referrals to the police or prosecuting authorities for criminal investigation. It has little scope for flexibility in its use of sanctions because of the legislative framework. The fines cannot be varied according to circumstances and do not cover the full range of offences and contraventions under the legislation.

6.  There are pending changes to the legislative framework which will clarify and expand the Commission's regulatory role in securing compliance with the law. The Political Parties and Elections Bill currently before Parliament would, if enacted, provide a wider range of flexible sanctions and enable the Commission to take a more proportionate approach.

7.  We found that the Commission wrote to all registered parties when it decided to begin levying penalties for late submission of donation and loan returns and annual accounts in 2007, but did not publicise this change in other ways including on its website, as it has with its policy on allegations and investigations. Best practice in regulation states that policies should be shared with all interested parties as an aid to compliance, but especially with those subject to regulation.

8.  The Commission analyses the statutory returns it receives to identify trends and assess changes in compliance levels, but does not report publicly on them. As yet, the Commission does not have a robust set of outcome focused performance measures that can be set against this analysis in order to assess its performance in regulating party finance.

ON COMPARISONS WITH OTHER REGULATORS:

9.  Other UK regulators and overseas Electoral Commissions have more flexible sanctions available to them, are longer established and generally regulate better established and tested rules. The Commission could nevertheless do more in the following areas:

Recommendations

We recommend the following:

  • The Commission does not yet have a fully risk based strategy for enforcement and compliance as best regulatory practice suggests. The Commission recognises the lack of such a strategy and is in the process of developing one.
  • The Commission does not yet have a comprehensive and transparent enforcement and sanctions policy. Work is well underway on indicative draft policies and guidance to coincide with Parliament's consideration of the Political Parties and Elections Bill. The Commission should develop and promulgate their guidance, based on a risk based strategy, through all available means (electronic and other) as an aid to compliance.
  • The Commission does not have a performance measurement framework with performance measures linked to outcomes as recommended in the Hampton report as best practice for regulators. We have provided separate guidance to the Commission on developing performance measures and once the risk based strategy recommended above is in place, it would be timely to develop performance measures.
  • The Commission is actively working towards compliance with the principles of effective regulation. The Commission needs to demonstrate its compliance with these principles in order to make effective use of a more flexible sanctions regime.



2  
The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom (Cm 4057, October 1998) Back

3   Available at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/20000041.htm Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 2 April 2009