Impact of the economic downturn on the South West and the Government's response - South West Regional Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40-59)

MR BEN BRADSHAW MP, JON BRIGHT, RICHARD BAYLY AND THOSS SHEARER

30 MARCH 2009

  Q40 Chairman: Coming back partly to that point, London is in the middle of all this and skews all the regional figures. If you take London out, the funding and investment across the regions is not hugely dissimilar, and the gross value added starts to look a bit more balanced. London is clearly going to be arguing very heavily at the moment that the financial sector has been hit, and it also has some manufacturing. How do the regions around London make their case, because London has a fair amount of clout? With its profile, it is quite capable of arguing above its weight and leaving the south-west batting below its weight.

  Mr Bradshaw: My experience is that both the National Economic Council and the Regional Economic Council take a careful analytical overview of the figures. From memory—obviously, I do not follow London as closely as I do the south-west—the figures do not show what you have just implied, which is that London is being disproportionately hit. In fact, there was certainly a three-month period—if it is not still happening—where, in terms of the percentage increase in unemployment, the south-west was the worst affected region, because we were coming mostly from a low base. In parts of Dorset, for example, and in many other parts of our region where unemployment had, to all intents and purposes, been eradicated, if just a handful of people are added to the jobseeker's allowance register, you then have a much bigger percentage increase than you do in some of the inner-city areas that still maintained a certain level of unemployment throughout the good times.

  Q41 Chairman: But we are talking about percentages. Yes, the percentage is rising faster in the south-west, but the numbers are significantly smaller none the less, and there will be those who argue the numbers rather than the percentages. How do you deal with that?

  Mr Bradshaw: Clearly, Government nationally must take a view on where to focus the help available, must it not? The Government help that has been made available and brought together in the very useful document "Real Help Now" is available nationally. When it comes to big strategic decisions about sectoral responses, as we have seen with the motor industry, for example, Government may feel that there is scope for doing something because of the strategic national importance of that particular industry to the UK. However, the south-west has been just as hard hit and would benefit just as much from that kind of help, because, with the exception of Swindon, other regions have more of an automotive sector than we do. A lot of the suppliers are in the south-west, and for aerospace it is even more significant.

  Q42 Kerry McCarthy: You have mentioned that the south-west is more dependent on small businesses than any other region. Obviously, it also has some quite remote rural areas. In your role, how do you strike a balance? Swindon is an obvious example of a place where there is a critical mass of employment, and it is easy to identify where the difficulties are in terms of the automotive industry and so on. How do you keep a balance between 50,000 people in a critical mass in Swindon and 50,000 people spread across Cornwall and Devon who all work in small businesses but might equally be at risk of losing their jobs or have difficulty accessing finance? How do you reach those people?

  Mr Bradshaw: At the monthly economic task group, we receive real-time, up-to-date information on figures and specific businesses that are in trouble. Clearly, if a major business such as the automotive industry in Swindon announced, as it did before Christmas, that it was reducing its working hours and closing down for a period, that is an issue in which, if required, we would get BERR nationally engaged on that specific manufacturer. If it is a generic problem of small businesses saying, "Well, it's all very well; you're telling us that you've told the banks, in which you now have a majority stake in some cases, that they should be lending, but it's not happening on the ground," then that is not necessarily a specific business issue but a general, generic issue with lending—although BERR has set up a designated hotline for businesses having particular problems either with their bank's lending policies or with accessing some of the help that the Government have already announced. You can do both those things: you can deal with the generic problem, and you can point people in the right direction and give them advice as to what to do if they have a problem specific to their business.

  Q43 Kerry McCarthy: In terms of bringing forward capital investment and proactive Government measures to try to keep people in jobs, particularly in the construction industry, how is that working across the south-west?

  Mr Bradshaw: Again, there will be the impact of decisions made nationally, such as to bring forward £1.2 billion of investment in housing to the current financial year, which will benefit the construction industry in the south-west as much as anywhere else: in fact, relatively speaking, probably more so. I think that I am right in saying that we have the biggest pot for capital spend for social housing of any of the regions in England. At the same time, one of the pieces of work that the regional task group is doing is to identify specific capital schemes—housing, transport and others—that might be held up because of the credit crunch or problems with one or another of the agencies involved in progressing such schemes, and seeing if we can unblock those. I think that I am right in saying that we have had some success in recent weeks in unblocking five significant capital schemes in the region, meaning that they can now go ahead. They are a mixture of housing and transport.

  Chairman: There were some nods at the end there. Is there anything that you would like to add to the Minister's comments?

  Thoss Shearer: I can confirm the figure. Regional agencies are working together and looking at how existing funds can be redistributed, or used more imaginatively, in order to meet the changed conditions impacting on each project. Those need to be taken on one by one to be solved.

  Q44 Kerry McCarthy: Is this going to happen quickly enough to make a difference? In Bristol, I am always incredibly frustrated by how long it takes to deliver on projects. That is sometimes because there seems to be endless consultation and sometimes because of the planning process. Now we are seeing developers pulling out of some projects. It might be happening more quickly than it was scheduled to, but will it be quick enough to make a difference to the country in 2009-10?

  Mr Bradshaw: We are focused on trying to ensure that any capital spending that can be brought forward to this year is brought forward and that any schemes that, for one reason or another, are not progressing, are progressed, if they can be. Two of the schemes to which I just referred are in Bristol: first, the former Blackberry Hill hospital—now Southmead hospital—is the site of 355 new homes, 2,000 sq m of employment space and a new district hospital; and secondly, the Hanham Hall, Bristol carbon challenge scheme, which includes 195 homes and 2,000 sq m of employment space. The other four schemes are as follows: one is the Dolcoath regeneration scheme, in Cornwall, which will include 390 new homes and 14,000 sq m of employment space; another in Devonport will have new apartments for the elderly; another in Devonport, Plymouth is Vision @ Devonport, which will include 463 new homes and nearly 10,000 sq m of employment space; and finally there is a scheme at Yeovil involving 717 new schemes with Barratt as the private partner. We are constantly on the lookout for any schemes where there might be a problem or uncertainty because of—inevitably—the economic climate, especially when it comes to private sector involvement, to see what we can do, as public agencies, to help to move those forward. We think that it is vital, at this point in the downturn, that we do not let up on investment. Making these investments, and keeping jobs and skills in the economy, will not only help us now, but put us in a better position to benefit from the inevitable upturn.

  Q45 Mr Drew: Traditionally, the south-west has been seen as two sub-regions—the east, which is fairly well-to-do and the major economic driver, and the west, including Cornwall, which with objective 1 status has needed a great deal more support. From all the evidence, the east is doing disproportionately badly in this recession. How do you convince people outside the region that the traditional growth zones, such as Gloucestershire—my county—and Dorset, might need particular help at this time, because they are the ones stalling? That might be because of the manufacturing issue that we were looking at earlier, but other things could be bringing that on. How do you convince the Chancellor and those outside the region that that part of the south-west might need particular help at the moment?

  Mr Bradshaw: They see the figures just as we do. You are right that the figures so far show that the most seriously affected parts of the region are Gloucestershire, Swindon and—to a certain extent—Bristol, but that is not to say that the global downturn is not being felt everywhere. It is too soon to say that that pattern will necessarily remain as circumstances evolve. The statistics on which you based your comments are the same as those that we see, and the same ones that the Chancellor and DBERR see when calibrating their response.

  Q46 Mr Drew: If the east is not doing as well as it could and should be, it also has an effect on the west. Although the impact has been graded less severely, we have an objective 1 status county—Cornwall—which takes a disproportionate amount of the resources. To be fair to Cornwall, it has fewer resources in the region to take, so that has a negative backwash effect on it. So this is quite a difficult region to steer at the moment. The normal driving force is not driving as much as it was, but the other bits will not be able to forestall some of the difficulties coming our way anything like as well as would be hoped. Is that the message that you are giving as a regional team?

  Mr Bradshaw: I would say it is a positive thing that Cornwall gets so much support. Of course, most of that support, or a significant amount of it, is from the European Union, which is a good thing for our region. I would not want to get into a position where the region was fighting within itself. That is not a constructive approach. One of the roles that a regional Minister can play is this: when we get sub-regions within the region making a case for more money, we can have a look at that, but we can also spell out the regional overview. You are right that so far the figures show a disproportionate impact on the north-east of the region, but the caveat to that is that it is the north-east of the region that has grown exponentially in the last 10 years, so any impact of any economic downturn is more likely, in raw figures, to be felt more acutely in that part of the country. Clearly, however, if there are sectoral-specific characteristics of that impact, that is something that not just the regional agencies but the Government would take into account when calibrating their response.

  Q47 Mr Drew: Do you see the region as a west and an east? That is traditionally the way it has been portrayed to us, but is that less so now? Are there further sub-regions that you ought to be looking at?

  Mr Bradshaw: I am not sure it is advisable to generalise in that way. There is no doubt that there is disproportionate growth and there are, as a matter of fact, disproportionate levels of GVA between the west and the east of the region, but there are also big differences within smaller areas. There will be wide variations within a county such as Gloucestershire. There will be wide variations in a county such as Devon. If you try to paint too general a picture of the gaps within the region, that does not necessarily help you to make a constructive and targeted response to the needs that the region and areas within the region have.

  Q48 Chairman: There have been raids on various budgets, which have impacted across the region. The neighbourhood renewal funding is going, and as a result of the changes that are following on from that, Bristol, Plymouth and Penwith are losing out. They are getting some transitional funding, but that will also impact on those areas. What do you think the impact will be on those areas as a result of the loss of that particular pot of funding, or do you get a sense that it is covered in another way? Richard, are you answering this, or Jon? You can both have a bite of the cherry. It is all right; we have time.

  Jon Bright: I will start. The neighbourhood renewal fund, when we had a neighbourhood renewal strategy, was always intended to be temporary. The idea was that what we had learned about the interventions that succeeded in reducing problems of worklessness, crime and so on would then be mainstreamed by the various agencies. They would change their practice in response to that knowledge and that would then continue the improvements that had been created in the various neighbourhoods. That is what we can do now, principally through the machinery of the local area agreement. There is an opportunity there for local authorities to agree indicators and targets with Government about what will be achieved in terms of tackling disadvantage. We have the machinery and there is the knowledge to take it further forward through the local area agreements. We have transitional funding in three areas now, but by 2010-11 we will not have any working neighbourhoods fund. However, we can still take that good practice forward.

  Q49 Chairman: But you are confident there will not be a significant hole as a result of the loss in those three particular areas in relation to what is currently being achieved?

  Mr Drew: This is in the context of declining RDA money anyway, which we keep being written to about, so something in the tool shed is not very happy at the moment.

  Jon Bright: One of the major differences between the working neighbourhoods fund and the neighbourhood renewal fund is the increased focus on tackling worklessness. That is what the working neighbourhoods fund would be used for were we to have more allocations of it in the region. We have got some excellent examples in the region of worklessness being tackled effectively, particularly down in Cornwall, with the Cornwall Works programme. That is a combination of the Jobcentre Plus and the Learning and Skills Council using European social fund money. That model, which has been shown to be extremely effective, is being spread eastwards. That is one way, I hope, that we can hope to continue to make an impact on those neighbourhoods most disadvantaged by high levels of worklessness. It will not happen automatically. We have got to ensure that the pressure is on to ensure that the replication of good practice continues.

  Richard Bayly: This has not, historically, been a major area of RDA investment, but one of the areas where we have been concerned that the transition should be smooth is around the impact on the third sector. There, we have been focused very much on the procurement practices for mainstream programmes—money coming out of the Department for Work and Pensions and the LSC, and the new ESF programmes—to try to ensure that the capacity that is being developed in the third sector is tapped effectively to support the sort of results that Jon has been talking about, particularly around worklessness. We have seen improvements in those areas, which we think will be helpful in making that transition smoother than it might have been.

  Q50 Mr Drew: I want to talk about an area that I asked the RDA about—I will come back to the overall budget in a minute because it is important and I want to try and nail it down. When I was talking to my businesses on Friday night, they were very clear that the public sector could lead and help and be vigorous over public procurement, whether regarding food, the supply chain for manufacturing or the health service—that was identified as being very helpful, and it could be more so. How do you see this playing out in this recession? Again, public procurement could be a driver of job retention. Contracts could be maintained or rejigged to ensure that there is an opportunity for firms in the region to be able to meet the demands of the region rather than them having to seek contracts from outside.

  Richard Bayly: There is a lot of potential, I think, but, on the whole, the successes come not by starting at the procurement end, but at the supply end, and working with partners to build up the supply chain capacity and the ability to use the procurement processes that are available strongly. Business Link is investing in that now. We have seen very successful examples around land-based industries building up the ability of people to bid-in to supplying for supermarkets and that sort of thing. At the end of the day, whatever we do has to work with the grain of the rules on competitive procurement and the inability to be unfairly discriminatory, but there is no reason why people cannot work with the supply side to build up the capacity of businesses, particularly smaller businesses who may be intimidated by the scale of some of the contracts. We could work out how they can be made more accessible for them.

  Mr Bradshaw: The most important principle is that we maintain the investment that allows that procurement to happen. Certainly as far as the health service is concerned, over the next two years, we see the capacity for investment and procurement at the highest levels ever because we have maintained and increased the level of investment in health care. The same is probably the case for most of the public sector, certainly for education. There is potential in the health service. We have seen this from the local food procurement that the Cornwall NHS pioneered. We are looking at rolling that out nationally. The public sector, including the health service, is committed to playing its part in increasing the number of apprentices over the next year or two—I cannot remember the exact figure, but the chief executive of the south-west strategic health authority told us at the last task group the number of apprentices to which he was committed to providing in the NHS across the region over the next year.

  Q51 Mr Drew: The other moan I heard last Friday—I might as well share it with you—was the problem of late payment. The public sector, certainly PCTs, were not immune from criticism. What mechanism have you got in place to make sure that all Government agencies are paying on time—if possible, paying early? Again, it is this churning of money, besides the help that we now expect from the banking system, which means that businesses can stay viable and can actually go out there and contract for new business; because if they do not get paid they cannot do any of that.

  Mr Bradshaw: Well, as I am sure you appreciate, the Government have reduced the period within which we expect—

  Mr Drew: They are not all obeying it, Minister.

  Mr Bradshaw: We have made quite clear to public service, certainly as far as the health service is concerned, that that is the expectation, and if you would like to bring, not necessarily in public, but privately, to my attention any primary care trusts or acute trusts that are not stepping up to the mark, then I would be happy to have a look at it; but I think our feedback is that most, if not the overwhelming majority, are.

  Q52 Kerry McCarthy: Are there any positive advantages from the current economic situation that you are looking to build upon—I mean particularly the exchange rate? Is that giving you scope to attract more inward investment to the region?

  Mr Bradshaw: I do not think it could really be said that there are advantages to what is an economic crisis unprecedented since the 1930s. However, I think there are sectors we can focus attention on. Tourism is one where I think there is potential to benefit from the current exchange rate and, although the signs are mixed at the moment, there are reports of quite healthy bookings in some parts of the tourism industry; there is certainly a drive nationally with the £6.5 million of extra marketing expenditure to market the UK to foreign visitors this year.

    So we are looking for what opportunities we can amid the current very gloomy situation, and I think we are also using the current downturn to refocus on the sectors that the south-west, in the medium to long term, can really benefit from significantly. One I heard mentioned by the RDA earlier is the whole marine area. Also there is renewable energy and green jobs, where I think we can be in the lead of regions. One of the pieces of work which the regional task group is doing at the moment is to become an exemplar for the UK as a whole in renewable energy and green jobs. Another is the potential we have to benefit from the Government's "Digital Britain" strategy, which is expected to report finally later this spring, which has potentially huge benefit for rural areas, in terms of improving business competitiveness and access through the fibre optic network.

    So those are some of the areas, I think, where we are thinking very hard about how to, when we get through this period, make sure the south-west is in the strongest position possible to benefit from the new jobs that are going to be created, and, indeed, are now being created, in some of these industries of the future.

  Q53 Chairman: You are confident that we are really encouraging innovation and bringing forward ideas at a very basic stage within the region?

  Mr Bradshaw: Yes, I think we are.

  Chairman: Because ultimately that is where the new businesses will come from.

  Mr Bradshaw: We have also got very effective partnership-working with our higher education sector, which is vital if we are going to exploit fully the potential that there is in our region to benefit from these industries which, because of our characteristics as a region, I think we are uniquely positioned to benefit from— particularly renewables and green jobs, and environmental technology as well. We have a very strong higher education sector; we have a very strong SME sector already, and a lot of potential to grow that, both during the downturn but particularly when the upturn comes.

  Richard Bayly: There is a very strong consensus in the Minister's task group that the management of the recession needs to look beyond, to the challenge of the recovery and the global market the region will still be in, and the importance of continuing to invest in innovation to build up productivity during that period.

  Q54 Chairman: To come back to David's point, clearly the recession has a cyclical pattern. From the figures that we have been presented with, some regions appear to be slightly ahead of us. For example, I am looking at Hometrack's figures on new build just for flats. We are still in a position where there is some new build, while other regions are having no new build at all. Are you confident that the measures introduced to encourage innovation, development and working with the universities will, in fact, help us not to be behind everybody else in coming out of the recession? We seem to be slightly behind in the level of unemployment and the way in which it is growing, and other impacts of the recession, but we do not really want to be behind when coming out at the other end, because we would then lose an advantage. Are you confident that we are doing everything we can to ensure that we are best placed to come through this, perhaps next year some time?

  Richard Bayly: That has been given very high priority. In our earlier discussion about the challenge faced by advanced manufacturing in the north of the region, one of the things that concerns us is exactly the kind of world-class, high-skilled manufacturing concern that the region has been aspiring to build up. It adds to the importance of being able to find ways of retaining that sort of top-level skill base within our economy, so we can respond to the opportunities of recovery.

  Mr Bradshaw: I also think that, because of the mixed nature of our economy, it brings with it a certain underlying resilience that we are not a regional economy that is solely dependent on one or two sectors. We are strong in a number of areas and our economy is very mixed from agriculture and fisheries—some of the more traditional land-based industries—to, as Richard just said, some of the really high-tech manufacturing and technological industries, and everything in between.

  Q55 Mr Drew: One of our advantages is that the most counter-cyclical industry at the moment is agriculture. In a sense, the south-west is ideally placed to ride the benefits of that, but also look to the future. It is pretty obvious that we shall have to raise the level of self-sufficiency in agriculture because of all the threats and difficulties that we have seen with rising food prices. How does this industry feature in the current recession obsession, if you like, looking to the future, where we could look at bolstering it—having more rather than less agriculture—and turning it back in terms of employment, with some land being given over to agriculture? Is that part of the task group's forward-thinking agenda?

  Mr Bradshaw: That may be something that you want to raise in more detail with my ministerial colleagues at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, but you are right to identify agriculture as one area of the economy that is doing counter-cyclically at the moment—not just counter-cyclically, but also benefiting from the exchange rate in terms of prices that are generally being received for goods. Because of that, it is important that we do not take our eye off the future development of agriculture and what it has to offer in respect of the region's overall strategy. Particularly going back to my point about the potential for land-based industry to contribute to renewable energy, that is certainly something that we are actively considering as part of our paper on green jobs that we are presenting to the National Economic Council.

  Q56 Mr Drew: I said that I would come back to the RDA budget. Clearly, it is of concern in the region, particularly at the present time when we need to see public sector leads and investment that will help us to turn around the corner. What representations have you made at least to look at the RDA's concern, which has been expressed to us on a number of occasions, that the budget has now been cut away to an undue amount? It will be difficult to review that further without taking out some of the growth areas and doing some of the maintenance work that must be put in place.

  Mr Bradshaw: I think the RDA has made Peter Mandelson and the Treasury well aware of its concern. This issue is not specific to the south-west region; it is a national one. One may argue about whether that was the right thing to do; I believe that it was, given the absolute priority of getting investment into housing schemes quickly as part of our fiscal stimulus. The money must come from somewhere, but I am sure that Alistair Darling will hear the representations on RDAs' funding generally, and south-west RDA's funding specifically as part of those that he will hear in the run-up to his Budget.

  Q57 Kerry McCarthy: You mentioned a paper on green jobs. What happens to that? It goes to the National Economic Council to be discussed, but is it intended that that will feed into wider Government consultation, or is it part of the pre-Budget preparation?

  Jon Bright: The work has been commissioned by the regional task group. It is still under way and the consultants are still working on it, but it is likely to focus on energy efficiency and generation in terms of renewables and nuclear, and on sustainable food and farming. Those are three areas where there will probably be a heavy focus.

    The idea is that when the task group is comfortable with it, we can then present it to the Council of Regional Ministers and perhaps the National Economic Council. It will also be routed through the RDA and Government office networks. I think we are the first region to have commissioned such a piece of work. There is real scope for it to help to accelerate our thinking about what to do when the recovery comes. There is a lot of interest in it.

  Q58 Kerry McCarthy: A rough time scale? You said, "when the task force is comfortable with it".

  Jon Bright: I am talking about a couple of weeks to improve the quality of the product before sharing it more widely.

  Q59Kerry McCarthy: Obviously, the RDA and representatives from the local authorities have given evidence, but who is in the driving seat in trying to ensure that the south-west is as well placed as possible to survive the recession? Is it the regional Minister and the Government office, is it the RDA, is it the regional assembly, or is it the leaders board? How do they fit together? Is there not a danger that with so many different players, no one will be sure whose responsibility it is to take things forward?

  Mr Bradshaw: I imagine that that is exactly the reason for the Prime Minister establishing the regional economic task groups, because that is the forum in which everyone meets, including the RDA representatives who were here just before us, local government representatives, including Rob Bluh and the chief executive of Devon county council. The reason is to ensure that we have an opportunity once monthly, at least, to spend a morning ensuring that we hear from business representatives on that group—such as the Federation of Small Businesses, the CBI and representatives of the chambers of commerce—what is happening on the ground in businesses, the latest up-to-date information, their latest concerns and whether the concerns that they raise are acted on, and that the resulting action regionally and nationally is fed back through the economic task group. I hope that I have answered your question. I would not claim that we are driving, but the task force is certainly fulfilling the important function of ensuring that everything is pulled together. If we had not set it up, it would have been much more difficult to track concerns raised and action taken, to prioritise, and to send clear messages in both directions to national Government and back to the region about what is happening and what needs to be done.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 3 August 2009