Submission from Plymouth
Civic Society
TRANSPORT IN THE SOUTH WEST
Bullet points:
· We need a new rail link between Exeter
and Plymouth
before the existing line is washed away.
· We need a better integrated public transport system in Plymouth with less need to
rely on the private car.
· We need a longer runway at Plymouth
Airport, access to slots at Heathrow
and better connections to Exeter and Bristol Airports.
· The existing road system in Plymouth
could be considerably improved by better traffic management.
· We need better port facilities at the old Royal Dockyard at
Devonport which should provide for cruises, more ferries and freight
facilities.
· We need better communication and consultation from all tiers of
Government but especially at regional and local level.
- Whether transport
provision in the SW is adequate to meet the demands placed upon it.
1. No. Far from it.
The SW is a vast Region stretching from Gloucestershire to Cornwall. Transport
provision and the need for improvements vary greatly across the Region. The
"Outer SW" from Exeter
westward, lacks significant infrastructure compared with much of the rest of
the Region and we often feel that Central Government is not prepared to invest
here. Providing better transport links between London
and Bristol, or even Exeter,
does not meet the needs of Plymouth and Cornwall. West of Exeter
road, rail and air infrastructure is poor compared with the rest of the Region
and much of the Country. The railway in particular is in very real danger of
being cut off because of coastal erosion.
Every winter we worry that the latest storm might cut us off completely
by rail. The road system west of Exeter is also at capacity and Plymouth airport is only capable of taking
small propeller-driven planes and there is no prospect of any improvement in
either.
- What the priorities
should be for improvement.
2. It is essential that a
replacement rail route be provided west of Exeter
to Plymouth to serve West Devon and to ensure Cornwall remains
connected to the national network. If you are going to build a new railway line
it should be high-speed capable and that should not cost any more than a
"low-speed" line. Railway is the greenest mass transport option and it would be
false economy to spend the money available on more polluting options like road
or air. Merely "hoping" that the railway does not get washed away is not a
serious policy for Government. We need a
transport system that provides a green transport future for local people and
the tourist industry on which so much of our economy depends.
3. Improving Plymouth Airport as currently proposed would
merely allow some slightly larger aeroplanes to use the runways; the prospect
of a full size airport is not on the cards.
While this might help some MPs and businessmen to make day trips to Plymouth, it would not
benefit the local people. If we want to
go abroad by air we must currently drive to Exeter
or Bristol Airports thus increasing the road
traffic. Neither Exeter nor Bristol has public transport connections at
the times when most ordinary people are expected to use them, ie before 9.00am.
4. Within Plymouth we need an enforceable integrated
transport policy. The lack of such a
policy is glaringly obvious. Few buses
go near the railway station and, of those that do, many do not stop. The coach
station is a disgrace and has been for many years though the Council seems
unable to do anything about it. It
should be closed and a new one opened near the railway station. The existing coach station land can then be
redeveloped. The roads are already
nearing capacity but the bus system, instead of expanding, is constantly being
reduced because the council cannot pay the sums demanded by the bus
operators. Few people living in the
suburbs of Plymouth can rely on a bus service to
get them home after work and even fewer can rely on a bus service to go into Plymouth for a meal or
entertainment in the evening. The result is that everyone needs a car merely to
get about. We have spent millions of
pounds on a modern Park & Ride at the George but it closes at 7.00pm. That is surely against Government policy on
the need for an environmentally-friendly transport system.
5. The road system within Plymouth is also
sub-standard. There are only 4 or 5 main
feeder roads into the city. The existing road system could be substantially
improved by:
a. Sequencing the traffic
lights to allow continuous flow into the centre. This must include not permitting pedestrians
to interrupt the flow on crossings but allowing unimpeded bus flow;
b. Allowing no right turns
anywhere other than at traffic lights during the busy periods in morning and
evening; right turns at traffic lights should have a filter lane (ie a third
lane);
c. If bus lanes are provided
then they should be all the way thorough not just for small distances; also the
provision of cycle lanes should be increased.
6. The provision of light
trains and trams, as proposed for the new town at Sherford, should be
considered for other parts of Plymouth.
- How these priorities
should be reflected in the up-coming Regional Transport Strategy.
7. Priority should be given
to an alternative railway between Exeter and Plymouth, connecting to Cornwall
and other parts of West Devon. The local authorities' plans for a new
railway connecting Tavistock to Plymouth are very
welcome but make more sense if Plymouth
will be connected to the rest of the Country.
An enforceable requirement for an integrated transport policy for Plymouth and better bus
services should also be included.
8. An extension of the runway
at Plymouth Airport allowing larger aircraft to use
it would be helpful as would access to slots at Heathrow. If it is to remain a base only for local
business flights within UK, there need to be better public transport
connections to Exeter and Bristol airports - railway connections would be best
in the longer term but bus and coach connections could be laid on without
investing a great deal more in infrastructure.
9. An extension of the
runway at Plymouth
Airport allowing larger
aircraft to use it would be helpful as would access to slots at Heathrow.
Plymouth Airport
should be providing a link service to at least one major hub airport (possibly
Heathrow, Gatwick or Paris CDG) with associated arrangements for appropriate
fast-transit facilities and agreements for guaranteed seats with the carriers
providing onward flights from the hub airport to ticket-holders in transit from
Plymouth in the
event of delays.
10. Plymouth City Council's
aspiration to make Plymouth
a city of 300,000 by 2021 will not happen without considerably better transport
connections.
11. As the Royal Navy
relinquishes more and more of the Dockyard, we should take the opportunity to
find an alternative use for the port.
How about much better facilities for cruises; ferry services to eg other
parts of Europe; better freight handling facilities (with access to rail
freight which would be much less polluting than road services).
- What the costs of these
improvements would be and whether the Region can afford them.
12. We cannot put specific
financial costs on these improvements but the social costs to the peninsula of
not meeting them would be very large.
Proper cost benefit analysis should show that the outer SW, without the
improvements proposed, would be condemned to further long-term decline with all
the social evils that brings with it. This will be made considerably worse with
the running down and possible closure of the Royal Dockyard in the foreseeable
future; or its use a disposal facility for nuclear waste.
- Whether the current
arrangements for prioritising, approving and funding infrastructure projects
are effective and appropriate.
13. Clearly not. There has been remarkably little consultation
locally on the needs of this part of the Region. We have noticed very little consultation
locally by the SW Regional Government who appear to spend most of their time in
the Bristol
area. If the Assembly ever meets down here we have not been told and the
members appear to be from local government who, again, do not consult locally
on any issues they are to discuss. We
are amazed that any responsible body looking for a greener future for our
Region should have decided to shelve the prospect of a replacement rail
connection west of Exeter. In most of Western Europe and even the USA it appears
to be generally accepted that the way forward in transport that contributes
least to climate change is railways - for passengers and freight. However, despite paying lip service to the
urgent need to reduce climate change, the Government seems not to be interested
in doing anything practical about it.
- Whether the Region is
doing enough to promote environmentally friendly transport.
14. Absolutely not. See paragraph 12.
- The role and
effectiveness of regional bodies such as the Regional Development Agency and SW
Councils in identifying and addressing transport issues.
15. We have no information on
what, if anything, the RDA is doing for the transport problems of this part of
the Region. If they have identified and
addressed our transport issues, especially Region-wide, they have not done a
good job of keeping local people informed.
The message we seem to have received is that, if there are any transport
problems, there is little they can, or will, do about them.
- The role and
effectiveness of Government Offices for the South West in delivering national
transport policy within the Region.
16. We assume that GOSW are
delivering the Government's national policy within the Region. This underlines how inadequate that policy
is. They do not publicise or consult
locally on whatever they are doing for the outer SW. To speak to local government officials or
councillors is not enough; they need to inform local, interested lay-people. Is
there a published statement of national transport policy for the SW Region?
- The ability of the
Government to influence private sector transport providers.
17. Government seems to be
incapable of influencing private transport providers in Plymouth.
There should be more specific policies requiring the private sector to
ensure that their facilities are integrated with other transport
providers. Local bus services seem to be
too easily removed on cost grounds.
Local Councils do not seem to have the money or inclination to require
better public transport services.
18. The lack of a reliable bus
service in Plymouth
means that everyone needs a car to get around.
In this era of climate change, Government needs to be planning ahead so
that people do not have to rely on a car for survival.
Peter Towey, Secretary, Plymouth Civic Society.
15th July 2009
|