House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2009 - 10
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

321

 

House of Commons

 
 

Tuesday 19 January 2010

 

Committee of the whole House

 

New Amendments handed in are marked thus Parliamentary Star

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill


 

Note

 

The Amendments have been arranged in accordance with the Constitutional

 

Reform and Governance (Programme) (No. 3) Motion.

 


 

third day

 

Mr William Cash

 

129

 

Parliamentary Star    

Clause  24,  page  12,  line  37,  after ‘to be’, insert ‘signed or’.

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

114

 

Clause  24,  page  12,  line  38,  leave out ‘a copy of the treaty’ and insert—

 

‘(i)    

a copy of the treaty and, at the same time,

 

(ii)    

an explanatory memorandum explaining the background to the

 

treaty, the Minister’s reasons for proposing to ratify it, and the

 

reasons for any reservations or interpretative declarations that

 

the Minister intends to enter on ratification,’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

1

 

Clause  24,  page  12,  leave out lines 41 and 42 and insert—

 

‘(c)    

both Houses of Parliament have resolved that the treaty should be

 

ratified.’.

 

Mr Douglas Hogg

 

Mr Philip Hollobone

 

Mr Peter Bone

 

46

 

Clause  24,  page  12,  line  42,  at end insert ‘and


 
 

Committee of the whole House: 19 January 2010            

322

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill, continued

 
 

(d)    

provided that the treaty is one that falls within subsection (2)(a) of this

 

section the text of the treaty has been approved by the electorate in a

 

national referendum held for the purpose of approving or disapproving

 

the treaty.

 

(1A)    

Any treaty which abrogates the sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament or

 

alters to a significant extent the political or legal or constitutional or economic

 

relationship of the United Kingdom with the European Union or its successor in

 

title is a treaty to which the provisions of subsection (1)(d) applies.’.

 

Mr William Hague

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Lidington

 

Mrs Eleanor Laing

 

Mr Brooks Newmark

 

125

 

Clause  24,  page  12,  line  42,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

In the case of treaties which transfer competences from the United Kingdom

 

Parliament to the European Union—

 

(a)    

subsection (1)(c) shall not apply,

 

(b)    

the procedure set out in new Clause [Referendum on Treaties which

 

transfer competences to the EU] shall apply.’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

2

 

Clause  24,  page  13,  line  1,  leave out subsection (2).

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

3

 

Clause  24,  page  13,  line  3,  leave out subsection (3).

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

4

 

Clause  24,  page  13,  line  5,  leave out subsection (4).

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

5

 

Clause  24,  page  13,  line  11,  leave out subsection (5).

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

6

 

Clause  24,  page  13,  line  13,  leave out subsection (6).


 
 

Committee of the whole House: 19 January 2010            

323

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill, continued

 
 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

7

 

Clause  24,  page  13,  leave out lines 15 to 20 and insert—

 

‘(7)    

Where the House of Commons has resolved that a treaty should be ratified but the

 

House of Lords has not so resolved, and a period of 21 sitting days has elapsed

 

since the House of Commons resolved that the treaty should be ratified, any

 

member of the House of Commons may move that the treaty should be ratified

 

despite the failure of the House of Lords so to resolve, and if such a resolution is

 

carried by the House of Commons, the House of Lords shall be deemed for the

 

purposes of subsection (1)(c) to have resolved that the treaty should be ratified.

 

(8)    

The preceding subsection does not apply where the House of Lords has resolved

 

that the treaty should not be ratified (but defeat of a motion in favour of

 

ratification does not count by itself as a resolution that the treaty should not be

 

ratified).

 


 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

8

 

Clause  25,  page  13,  line  23,  leave out ‘the period mentioned in section 24 (1) (c)’

 

and insert ‘the period of 21 days mentioned in section 24 (the period after which the House

 

of Commons may pass a motion the effect of which is to deem that the House of Lords

 

has resolved that the treaty should be ratified)’.

 


 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

116

 

Clause  26,  page  13,  line  34,  at beginning insert ‘subject to the provisions of section

 

[Committee on Treaties].’.

 

Mr William Hague

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Lidington

 

Mrs Eleanor Laing

 

Mr Brooks Newmark

 

127

 

Clause  26,  page  13,  line  39,  at end insert ‘or if the treaty transfers competences

 

from the United Kingdom Parliament to the European Union.’.

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

115

 

Page  12,  line  33,  leave out Clause 26.

 



 
 

Committee of the whole House: 19 January 2010            

324

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill, continued

 
 

Mr William Hague

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Lidington

 

Mrs Eleanor Laing

 

Mr Brooks Newmark

 

126

 

Clause  27,  page  14,  line  10,  after ‘(1)’, insert ‘Save as provided for in section

 

24(1A),’.

 


 

Mr William Cash

 

130

 

Parliamentary Star    

Clause  28,  page  14,  line  36,  at end insert ‘unless made in pursuance of the

 

European Communities Act 1972.’.

 

Mr William Cash

 

131

 

Parliamentary Star    

Clause  28,  page  14,  line  37,  after ‘ratification’ insert ‘or signing’.

 

Mr William Hague

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Lidington

 

Mrs Eleanor Laing

 

Mr Brooks Newmark

 

128

 

Clause  28,  page  14,  line  44,  at end add—

 

‘(5)    

In this Part, “competences” means areas of supplementary, shared or exclusive

 

jurisdiction.’.

 


 

new clauses relating to part 2

 

Committee on Treaties

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

NC59

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

There shall be a committee to be known as the Committee on Treaties (“the

 

Committee”), to examine treaties which a Minister has determined are to be

 

ratified under section 26.

 

(2)    

The members of the Committee shall be drawn from the House of Commons and

 

the House of Lords.

 

(3)    

The members of the Committee shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House

 

of Commons after consultation with the Lord Speaker, and such other

 

consultations as he considers appropriate.


 
 

Committee of the whole House: 19 January 2010            

325

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill, continued

 
 

(4)    

Membership of the committee shall be for a term of office that the Speaker

 

considers appropriate, but shall cease when a member ceases to be a member of

 

either House.

 

(5)    

The Committee shall appoint one of its number to the chair of the Committee.

 

(6)    

The Committee may determine its own procedure.

 

(7)    

Where a Minister has made a determination under section 26 that a treaty should

 

be ratified without the requirements of section 24 having been met, the treaty may

 

not be ratified unless the Committee has resolved that it should be ratified, and

 

has reported its decision to the Speaker and the Lord Speaker.’.

 


 

Referendum on treaties which transfer competences to the EU

 

Mr William Hague

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mr Mark Francois

 

Mr David Lidington

 

Mrs Eleanor Laing

 

Mr Brooks Newmark

 

NC68

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section shall apply in the case of a treaty which transfers competences from

 

the United Kingdom Parliament to the European Union.

 

(2)    

A referendum shall be held throughout the United Kingdom and Gibraltar on the

 

day specified by a Minister of the Crown.

 

(3)    

The question to be asked in the referendum is whether the British people approve

 

the ratification of the treaty, “Yes” or “No”.

 

(4)    

A person is entitled to vote in the referendum if, on the day it is held, he is—

 

(a)    

an individual who would be entitled to vote as an elector at a

 

parliamentary election in a constituency in the United Kingdom;

 

(b)    

a peer who would be entitled to vote as an elector at a local government

 

election in an electoral area in Great Britain or at a local election in an

 

electoral area in Northern Ireland; or

 

(c)    

a Commonwealth citizen who would be entitled to vote in Gibraltar as an

 

elector at a European Parliamentary election.

 

(5)    

A Minister of the Crown may by order make provision in relation to the

 

referendum which—

 

(a)    

determines the referendum period for the purposes of Part 7 of the

 

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41); and

 

(b)    

requires ballot papers to be used by voters in Wales, after having set out

 

the question and the possible answers in English, to set them out again,

 

with equal prominence, in Welsh.

 

(c)    

makes provisions as to the conduct of the referendum, entitlement to vote

 

in the referendum and legal challenge to the referendum result.

 

(6)    

Every power of a Minister of the Crown to make an order under this section shall

 

be exercisable by statutory instrument.

 

(7)    

An order under this section may be made only if a draft of the order has been—

 

(a)    

laid before Parliament; and

 

(b)    

approved by resolution of each House.


 
 

Committee of the whole House: 19 January 2010            

326

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill, continued

 
 

(8)    

A treaty subject to Section 24, (1A) can come in to force in accordance with

 

provisions made by the Secretary of State by order made by Statutory Instrument

 

provided—

 

(a)    

the Chief Counting Officer has given a certificate under section 128(6) of

 

the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41)

 

certifying the outcome of the referendum; and

 

(b)    

the total number of votes certified as cast in favour of the answer “Yes”

 

exceeds the total number certified as cast in favour of the answer “No”.’.

 


 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Mrs Eleanor Laing

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

117

 

Clause  35,  page  18,  line  4,  leave out ‘sections 132 to 138’ and insert ‘sections 132

 

to 136 and 138’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

27

 

Clause  35,  page  18,  line  6,  leave out subsection (2).

 


 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

119

 

Schedule  5,  page  54,  line  26,  leave out from ‘procession’ to end of line 18 on page

 

55 and insert ‘or a public assembly that is having the effect of preventing reasonable

 

access to the Houses of Parliament.

 

(2)    

The Speaker of the House of Commons shall decide whether reasonable access to

 

the Houses of Parliament has been prevented.

 

(3)    

If the Speaker has decided under subsection (2) that reasonable access to the

 

Houses of Parliament has been prevented, the senior police officer may, for the

 

purpose of restoring reasonable access to the Houses of Parliament, give

 

directions to any person who is organising or taking part in the public procession

 

or public assembly.

 

(4)    

The directions referred to in subsection (3) must be necessary for the purpose of

 

restoring access to the Houses of Parliament and proportionate to that purpose.’.

 

Secretary Jack Straw

 

96

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  line  1,  leave out from ‘requirements’ to end of line 2 and

 

insert ‘specifying entrances at or by the Palace of Westminster or Portcullis House—’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

106

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  leave out lines 6 and 7.


 
 

Committee of the whole House: 19 January 2010            

327

 

Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

111

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  line  7,  at end insert ‘in relation to how the specified

 

requirements for maintaining access to and from the Palace of Westminster shall be met’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

103

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  leave out lines 8 to 10 and insert ‘A statutory instrument

 

containing an order under this section must be approved by both Houses of Parliament.’.

 

Mr Andrew Dismore

 

113

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  line  12,  leave out ‘include’ and insert ‘are limited to’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

120

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  leave out lines 22 to 25.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

121

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  leave out lines 28 to 38.

 

Secretary Jack Straw

 

97

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  line  34,  leave out from ‘than’ to end of line 35 and insert ‘300

 

metres in a straight line from the nearest relevant entrance.

 

( )    

Each of the following is a relevant entrance for the purposes of subsection (3)—

 

(a)    

Carriage Gates;

 

(b)    

St Stephen’s Entrance;

 

(c)    

Peers’ Entrance;

 

(d)    

Black Rod’s Garden Entrance;

 

(e)    

the main entrance to Portcullis House (on Victoria Embankment).’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

104

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  leave out lines 36 to 38 and insert ‘A statutory instrument

 

containing an order under this section must be approved by both Houses of Parliament.’.

 

David Howarth

 

Mr David Heath

 

122

 

Schedule  5,  page  55,  line  39,  leave out from beginning to end of line 32 on page 56

 

and insert—

 

‘14ZB

Special provision for a House or Committee meeting outside Palace of

 

Westminster

 

(1)    

If either House of Parliament, or a committee of either House of Parliament,

 

intends to meet in a building outside the Palace of Westminster, the Secretary of


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Revised 19 January 2010