|
| |
|
(2) | Condition A is that a company (“the seller”) carrying on a trade has disposed |
| |
| |
(a) | an asset which was used for the purposes of that trade, or |
| |
(b) | an interest in such an asset. |
| |
(3) | Condition B is that the asset is used, under a lease, by the seller or a company |
| 5 |
associated with the seller (“the lessee”) for the purposes of a ring fence trade |
| |
carried on by the lessee. |
| |
(4) | Condition C is that the lessee uses the asset before the end of the period of two |
| |
years beginning with the disposal. |
| |
(5) | Subsection (6) applies to so much (if any) of the expenditure incurred by the |
| 10 |
lessee under the lease as— |
| |
(a) | falls, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, to be |
| |
treated in the accounts of the lessee as a finance charge, or |
| |
(b) | falls, if the lease is a long funding operating lease, to be deductible in |
| |
calculating the profits of the lessee for corporation tax purposes (after |
| 15 |
first making against any such expenditure any reductions falling to be |
| |
made as a result of section 379 (lessee under long funding operating |
| |
| |
| But subsection (6) is subject to subsection (7). |
| |
(6) | The expenditure is not allowable in calculating for the purposes of Part 3 of |
| 20 |
CTA 2009 the profits of the ring fence trade. |
| |
(7) | Expenditure is not to be disallowed because of subsection (6) so far as the |
| |
disposal mentioned in subsection (2) is made for a consideration which— |
| |
(a) | is used to meet expenditure incurred by the seller in carrying on oil |
| |
extraction activities or in acquiring oil rights otherwise than from a |
| 25 |
company associated with the seller, or |
| |
(b) | is appropriated to meeting expenditure to be so incurred by the seller. |
| |
| |
(a) | would, but for subsection (6), be allowable in calculating for the |
| |
purposes of Part 3 of CTA 2009 the profits of the ring fence trade for an |
| 30 |
| |
(b) | because of that subsection is not so allowable, |
| |
| the expenditure is to be brought into account for the purposes of Part 5 of CTA |
| |
2009 (loan relationships) as if it were a non-trading debit in respect of a loan |
| |
relationship of the lessee for that period. |
| 35 |
| |
“long funding operating lease” means a long funding operating lease for |
| |
the purposes of Part 2 of CAA 2001 (see section 70YI(1) of that Act), and |
| |
“lease”, in relation to an asset, has the same meaning as in Chapter 3 of |
| |
Part 19 (see section 868). |
| 40 |
Regional development grants |
| |
289 | Reduction of expenditure by reference to regional development grant |
| |
(1) | This section applies if conditions A and B are met. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(2) | Condition A is that a person has incurred expenditure (by way of purchase, |
| |
rent or otherwise) on the acquisition of an asset in a transaction to which |
| |
paragraph 2 of Schedule 4 to OTA 1975 applies (transactions between |
| |
connected persons or otherwise than at arm’s length). |
| |
(3) | Condition B is that the expenditure incurred by the other person mentioned in |
| 5 |
that paragraph in acquiring, bringing into existence or enhancing the value of |
| |
the asset as mentioned in that paragraph — |
| |
(a) | has been or is to be met by a regional development grant, and |
| |
(b) | falls (in whole or in part) to be taken into account under Part 2 or 6 of |
| |
CAA 2001 (capital allowances relating to plant and machinery or |
| 10 |
research and development). |
| |
(4) | Subsection (5) applies for the purposes of the charge to corporation tax on the |
| |
income arising from the activities of the person mentioned in subsection (2) |
| |
which are treated by section 279 as a separate trade for those purposes. |
| |
(5) | The expenditure mentioned in subsection (2) is to be reduced by the amount of |
| 15 |
the regional development grant mentioned in subsection (3). |
| |
(6) | In this section “regional development grant” means a grant falling within |
| |
section 534(1) of CAA 2001 (Northern Ireland regional development grant). |
| |
290 | Adjustment as a result of regional development grant |
| |
(1) | This section applies if conditions A, B and C are met. |
| 20 |
(2) | Condition A is that expenditure incurred by a company in relation to an asset |
| |
in an accounting period (“the initial period”) has been or is to be met by a |
| |
regional development grant. |
| |
(3) | Condition B is that, despite the provisions of section 534(2) and (3) of CAA 2001 |
| |
(Northern Ireland regional development grants) and section 289 of this Act, in |
| 25 |
determining that company’s liability to corporation tax for the initial period, |
| |
the whole or some part of that expenditure falls to be taken into account under |
| |
| |
| |
(a) | expenditure on the asset becomes allowable under section 3 or 4 of |
| 30 |
OTA 1975 in an accounting period (an “adjustment period”) |
| |
subsequent to the initial period, or |
| |
(b) | the proportion of any such expenditure which is allowable in an |
| |
adjustment period is different as compared with the initial period. |
| |
(5) | There is to be redetermined for the purposes of subsections (7) and (8) the |
| 35 |
amount of the expenditure mentioned in subsection (2) which would have |
| |
been taken into account as mentioned in subsection (3) if the circumstances |
| |
mentioned in subsection (4) had existed in the initial period. |
| |
(6) | According to whether the amount as so redetermined is greater or less than the |
| |
amount actually taken into account as mentioned in subsection (3), the |
| 40 |
difference is referred to in subsections (7) and (8) as the increase or the |
| |
reduction in the allowance. |
| |
(7) | If there is an increase in the allowance, an amount of capital expenditure equal |
| |
to the increase is to be treated, for the purposes of Part 2 or 6 of CAA 2001, as |
| |
having been incurred by the company concerned in the adjustment period on |
| 45 |
an extension of, or addition to, the asset mentioned in subsection (2). |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(8) | If there is a reduction in the allowance, the company concerned is to be treated, |
| |
for the purpose of determining its liability to corporation tax, as having |
| |
received in the adjustment period, as income of the trade in connection with |
| |
which the expenditure mentioned in subsection (2) was incurred, a sum equal |
| |
to the amount of the reduction in the allowance. |
| 5 |
(9) | In this section “regional development grant” has the meaning given by section |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(1) | Subsection (5) applies to a sum which meets conditions A, B and C. |
| 10 |
(2) | Condition A is that the sum constitutes a tariff receipt or tax-exempt tariffing |
| |
receipt of a person who is a participator in an oil field. |
| |
(3) | Condition B is that the sum constitutes consideration in the nature of income |
| |
| |
(4) | Condition C is that the sum would not, but for subsection (5), be treated as |
| 15 |
mentioned in that subsection. |
| |
(5) | The sum is to be treated as a receipt of the separate trade mentioned in section |
| |
| |
(6) | So far as they would not otherwise be so treated, the activities— |
| |
(a) | of a participator in an oil field, or |
| 20 |
(b) | of a person connected with the participator, |
| |
| in making available an asset in a way which gives rise to tariff receipts or tax- |
| |
exempt tariffing receipts of the participator are to be treated for the purposes |
| |
of this Part as oil extraction activities. |
| |
(7) | In determining for the purposes of subsection (2) whether a sum constitutes a |
| 25 |
tariff receipt or tax-exempt tariffing receipt of a person who is a participator, |
| |
no account may be taken of any sum which— |
| |
(a) | is in fact received or receivable by a person connected with the |
| |
| |
(b) | constitutes a tariff receipt or tax-exempt tariffing receipt of the |
| 30 |
| |
| But in relation to the person by whom such a sum is actually received, |
| |
subsection (2) has effect as if the person were a participator and as if condition |
| |
| |
(8) | References in this section to a person connected with a participator include a |
| 35 |
person with whom the person is associated, within the meaning of paragraph |
| |
11 of Schedule 2 to the Oil Taxation Act 1983, but section 1176(1) of this Act |
| |
(meaning of “connected” persons) does not apply for the purposes of this |
| |
| |
| 40 |
“tax-exempt tariffing receipt” has the meaning given by section 6A(2) of |
| |
the Oil Taxation Act 1983, and |
| |
“tariff receipt” has the same meaning as in that Act. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
292 | Expenditure on and under abandonment guarantees |
| |
(1) | Subsection (2) applies if, as a result of section 3(1)(hh) of OTA 1975 (obtaining |
| |
abandonment guarantee), expenditure incurred by a participator in an oil field |
| |
is allowable (in whole or in part) for petroleum revenue tax purposes under |
| 5 |
| |
(2) | So far as that expenditure is so allowable, it is to be allowed as a deduction in |
| |
calculating the participator’s ring fence income. |
| |
(3) | Subsection (4) applies if a payment is made by the guarantor under an |
| |
| 10 |
(4) | So far as any expenditure for which the relevant participator is liable is met, |
| |
directly or indirectly, out of the payment, the expenditure is not to be regarded |
| |
for corporation tax purposes as having been incurred by the relevant |
| |
participator or any other participator in the oil field concerned. |
| |
(5) | See also section 294 (payment under abandonment guarantee not immediately |
| 15 |
| |
| |
“abandonment guarantee” has the same meaning as it has for the |
| |
purposes of section 105 of FA 1991 (see section 104 of that Act), and |
| |
“the guarantor” and “the relevant participator” have the same meaning as |
| 20 |
in section 104 of that Act. |
| |
293 | Relief for reimbursement expenditure under abandonment guarantees |
| |
(1) | This section applies if— |
| |
(a) | a payment (“the guarantee payment”) is made by the guarantor under |
| |
an abandonment guarantee, |
| 25 |
(b) | as a result of the making of the guarantee payment, the relevant |
| |
participator becomes liable under the terms of the abandonment |
| |
guarantee to pay any sum to the guarantor, and |
| |
(c) | expenditure is incurred, or consideration in money’s worth is given, by |
| |
the relevant participator in or towards meeting that liability. |
| 30 |
(2) | In this section “reimbursement expenditure” means expenditure incurred as |
| |
mentioned in subsection (1)(c) or consideration (or the value of consideration) |
| |
given as so mentioned; and any reference to the incurring of reimbursement |
| |
expenditure is to be read accordingly. |
| |
(3) | So much of any reimbursement expenditure as constitutes qualifying |
| 35 |
expenditure (see subsection (4)) is to be allowed as a deduction in calculating |
| |
the relevant participator’s ring fence income; and no part of the expenditure |
| |
which is so allowed is to be otherwise deductible or allowable by way of relief |
| |
for corporation tax purposes. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
(4) | The amount of reimbursement expenditure incurred in any accounting period |
| |
by the relevant participator which constitutes qualifying expenditure is |
| |
determined by the formula—
|
| |
| |
A is the reimbursement expenditure incurred in the accounting period, |
| 5 |
B is so much of the expenditure represented by the guarantee payment as, |
| |
had it been incurred by the relevant participator, would have been |
| |
taken into account (by way of capital allowance or a deduction) in |
| |
calculating the relevant participator’s ring fence income, and |
| |
C is the total of the sums which, at or before the end of the accounting |
| 10 |
period, the relevant participator is or has become liable to pay to the |
| |
guarantor as mentioned in subsection (1)(b). |
| |
| But this is subject to subsection (5). |
| |
(5) | In relation to the guarantee payment, the total of the reimbursement |
| |
expenditure (whenever incurred) which constitutes qualifying expenditure |
| 15 |
may not exceed whichever is the less of B and C in subsection (4). |
| |
(6) | Any limitation on qualifying expenditure under subsection (5) is to be applied |
| |
to the expenditure of a later accounting period in preference to an earlier one. |
| |
(7) | For the purposes of this section, the expenditure represented by the guarantee |
| |
payment is any expenditure— |
| 20 |
(a) | for which the relevant participator is liable, and |
| |
(b) | which is met, directly or indirectly, out of the guarantee payment (and |
| |
which, accordingly, because of section 292(4) is not to be regarded as |
| |
expenditure incurred by the relevant participator). |
| |
| 25 |
(a) | section 294 (payment under abandonment guarantee not immediately |
| |
| |
(b) | section 295 which excludes amounts from subsection (1). |
| |
294 | Payment under abandonment guarantee not immediately applied |
| |
(1) | This section applies if— |
| 30 |
(a) | a payment made by the guarantor under an abandonment guarantee is |
| |
not immediately applied in meeting any expenditure, |
| |
(b) | the payment is for any period invested (either specifically or together |
| |
with payments made by persons other than the guarantor) so as to be |
| |
represented by, or by part of, the assets of a fund or account, and |
| 35 |
(c) | at a subsequent time, any expenditure for which the relevant |
| |
participator is liable is met out of the assets of the fund or account. |
| |
(2) | The references in sections 292(4) and 293(7) to expenditure which is met, |
| |
directly or indirectly, out of the payment are to be read as references to so much |
| |
of the expenditure for which the relevant participator is liable as is met out of |
| 40 |
those assets of the fund or account which, at the subsequent time mentioned in |
| |
subsection (1)(c), it is just and reasonable to attribute to the payment. |
| |
|
| |
|