House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2009 - 10
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

401

 

SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS

 
 

Wednesday 7 April 2010

 

Committee of the whole House

 

Proceedings

 

Digital Economy Bill [Lords]


 

Secretary Ben Bradshaw

 

Not selected  1

 

Page  1,  line  2,  leave out Clause 1.

 

Clause Disagreed to.

 

Clauses 2 and 3 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Withdrawn  36

 

Clause  4,  page  6,  leave out lines 16 to 20 and insert ‘infringement of the owner’s

 

copyright appears to have taken place by means of an internet access service’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  37

 

Clause  4,  page  6,  line  27,  at end insert ‘by reason of the work in relation to which

 

the copyright subsists being uploaded or downloaded to peer-to-peer filesharing

 

networks.’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Withdrawn  39

 

Clause  4,  page  7,  line  36,  after ‘subscriber’, insert ‘which have been the subject of

 

notifications sent after the effective date of an order made by the Secretary of State under

 

section 124H’.


 
 

Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 7 April 2010      

402

 

Digital Economy Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  38

 

Clause  4,  page  7,  line  39,  leave out ‘electronic or’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 

Clause 5 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Don Foster

 

Withdrawn  15

 

Clause  6,  page  8,  line  25,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘must’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  35

 

Clause  6,  page  8,  line  29,  after ‘case’, insert ‘or in relation to a particular class of

 

internet service providers or subscribers’.

 

Mr Don Foster

 

Not called  14

 

Clause  6,  page  8,  line  33,  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

specifies reasonable rights and obligations in relation to a subscriber that

 

is a library, an educational or cultural establishment, hotelier or internet

 

cafe as a provider of networks operating between an internet service

 

provider and a user of the network.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Don Foster

 

Withdrawn  12

 

Clause  7,  page  9,  line  35,  leave out ‘six’ and insert ‘nine’.

 

Mr Don Foster

 

Not called  13

 

Clause  7,  page  9,  line  36,  leave out from ‘force’ to end of line 38.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Secretary Ben Bradshaw

 

Agreed to on division  2

 

Clause  8,  page  11,  line  23,  leave out from ‘transparent’ to end of line 26.


 
 

Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 7 April 2010      

403

 

Digital Economy Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  32

 

Clause  8,  page  11,  line  30,  after ‘copyright’, insert ‘through peer-to-peer

 

filesharing networks’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  33

 

Clause  8,  page  11,  line  31,  after ‘evidence’, insert ‘in relation to subsistence of

 

copyright and infringement of the owner’s copyright through peer-to-peer filesharing

 

networks’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  34

 

Clause  8,  page  11,  line  42,  at end insert—

 

‘(d)    

an indication of whether or not it is alleged that the subscriber or anyone

 

else obtained financial or commercial gain from the alleged online

 

copyright infringement through peer-to-peer filesharing networks’.

 

Clause, as amended, agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  30

 

Clause  9,  page  12,  line  39,  after ‘copyright’, insert ‘through peer-to-peer

 

filesharing networks’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  31

 

Clause  9,  page  13,  line  11,  after ‘copyright’, insert ‘through peer-to-peer

 

filesharing networks’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  27

 

Clause  10,  page  14,  line  13,  leave out ‘by means of the internet’ and insert ‘by

 

reason of their infringing copyright through the use of a peer-to-peer file sharing


 
 

Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 7 April 2010      

404

 

Digital Economy Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

network’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not selected  28

 

Clause  10,  page  14,  line  28,  after ‘providers’, insert ‘consumer groups, the

 

judiciary,’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  29

 

Clause  10,  page  14,  line  31,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

an economic and social impact assessment as to whether any application of the

 

technical measures will be proportionate to its likely affect on, inter alia,

 

subscribers, households, businesses, users of wi-fi networks, not-for-profit

 

organisations, libraries, educational establishments and the internet network;

 

and’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  24

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  line  7,  after ‘providers’, insert ‘in relation to online copyright

 

infringement through peer-to-peer filesharing networks’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not selected  25

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  line  18,  leave out from ‘An’ to end of line 19 and insert ‘order

 

under this section may not be made by the Secretary of State unless—

 

(a)    

the Secretary of State has laid a draft order and explanatory document

 

before Parliament in accordance with section 302B; and

 

(b)    

the order is made in accordance with section 302C on super-affirmative

 

procedure.’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  26

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  leave out lines 21 and 22.

 

Mr Don Foster

 

Not called  16

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  line  25,  after ‘section’, insert—

 

‘(a)    

before the super-affirmative procedure under section 124HA has

 

completed, and


 
 

Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 7 April 2010      

405

 

Digital Economy Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(b)    

’.

 

Secretary Ben Bradshaw

 

Agreed to  44

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  line  25,  after ‘unless’ insert—

 

‘(a)    

the Secretary of State has complied with subsections (6) to (10), and

 

(b)    

’.

 

Secretary Ben Bradshaw

 

Agreed to  45

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  line  27,  at end insert—

 

‘(6)    

If the Secretary of State proposes to make an order under this section, the

 

Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a document that—

 

(a)    

explains the proposal, and

 

(b)    

sets it out in the form of a draft order.

 

(7)    

During the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the document was

 

laid under subsection (6) (“the 60-day period”), the Secretary of State may not lay

 

before Parliament a draft order to give effect to the proposal (with or without

 

modifications).

 

(8)    

In preparing a draft order under this section to give effect to the proposal, the

 

Secretary of State must have regard to any of the following that are made with

 

regard to the draft order during the 60-day period—

 

(a)    

any representations, and

 

(b)    

any recommendations of a committee of either House of Parliament

 

charged with reporting on the draft order.

 

(9)    

When laying before Parliament a draft order to give effect to the proposal (with

 

or without modifications), the Secretary of State must also lay a document that

 

explains any changes made to the proposal contained in the document laid before

 

Parliament under subsection (6).

 

(10)    

In calculating the 60-day period, no account is to be taken of any time during

 

which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or during which either House is

 

adjourned for more than 4 days.’.

 

Mr Don Foster

 

Not called  17

 

Clause  11,  page  15,  line  27,  at end add—

 

‘124HA 

 Super-affirmative procedure

 

(1)    

The Secretary of State must have regard to—

 

(a)    

any representations,

 

(b)    

any resolutions of either House of Parliament, and

 

(c)    

any recommendations of a committee of either House of Parliament

 

charged with reporting on the draft order,

 

made during the 60-day period with regard to the draft order.

 

(2)    

If, after the expiry of the 60-day period, the Secretary of State wishes to make an

 

order in the terms of the draft, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament

 

a statement—

 

(a)    

stating whether any representations were made under subsection (1)(a);

 

and

 

(b)    

if any representations were so made, giving details of them.


 
 

Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 7 April 2010      

406

 

Digital Economy Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(3)    

The Secretary of State may after the laying of such a statement make an order in

 

the terms of the draft if it is approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament.

 

(4)    

However, a committee of either House charged with reporting on the draft order

 

may, at any time after the laying of a statement under subsection (2) and before

 

the draft order is approved by that House under subsection (3), recommend under

 

this subsection that no further proceedings be taken in relation to the draft order.

 

(5)    

Where a recommendation is made by a committee of either House under

 

subsection (4) in relation to a draft order, no proceedings may be taken in relation

 

to the draft order in that House under subsection (3) unless the recommendation

 

is, in the same Session, rejected by resolution of that House.

 

(6)    

If, after the expiry of the 60-day period, the Secretary of State wishes to make an

 

order consisting of a version of the draft order with material changes, the

 

Secretary of State must lay before Parliament—

 

(a)    

a revised draft order; and

 

(b)    

a statement giving details of any representations made under subsection

 

(1)(a) and of the revisions proposed.

 

(7)    

The Secretary of State may after laying a revised draft order and statement under

 

subsection (6) make an order in the terms of the revised draft if it is approved by

 

a resolution of each House of Parliament.

 

(8)    

However, a committee of either House charged with reporting on the revised draft

 

order may, at any time after the revised draft order is laid under subsection (6) and

 

before it is approved by that House under subsection (7), recommend under this

 

subsection that no further proceedings be taken in relation to the revised draft

 

order.

 

(9)    

Where a recommendation is made by a committee of either House under

 

subsection (8) in relation to a revised draft order, no proceedings may be taken in

 

relation to the revised draft order in that House under subsection (7) unless the

 

recommendation is, in the same Session, rejected by resolution of that House.

 

(10)    

For the purposes of subsections (3) and (7) an order is made in the terms of a draft

 

order if it contains no material changes to the provisions of the draft order.

 

(11)    

In this section the “60-day period” means of the period of 60 days beginning with

 

the day on which the draft order was laid before Parliament under section 124H.

 

(12)    

In calculating the 60-day period no account is to be taken of any time during

 

which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or during which either House is

 

adjourned for more than four days.’.

 

Clause, as amended, agreed to

 

Clause 12 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  43

 

Clause  13,  page  16,  line  35,  leave out ‘and’ and insert—

 

‘( )    

that those provisions are proportionate to their effect and take into

 

account the impact upon, and relevant arrangements made by, an

 

educational establishment, prescribed library or accredited museum in

 

order to achieve what the provisions are intended to achieve; and’.


 
 

Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 7 April 2010      

407

 

Digital Economy Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  22

 

Clause  14,  page  18,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘(c)    

that the standard of evidence underlining the notification complies with

 

the standard set out in the initial obligations code, as determined by the

 

criteria set out in 124E(1) and (2).’.

 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  23

 

Clause  14,  page  18,  leave out from line 39 to end of line 23 on page 19 and add—

 

‘(9)    

Technical measures shall only be applied against a subscriber following a finding

 

by the court that they have infringed copyright by means of an Internet Access

 

Service and such court shall have power to—

 

(a)    

withdraw, or

 

(b)    

confirm the implementation of a proposed technical measure.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Secretary Ben Bradshaw

 

Agreed to  3

 

Clause  15,  page  19,  line  42,  after ‘provider’ insert ‘or owner’.

 

Clause, as amended, agreed to

 


 

Mr Tom Watson

 

Mr John Grogan

 

Mr David Drew

 

Not called  42

 

Clause  16,  page  20,  line  24,  after ‘incur’, insert ‘and shall

 

( )    

in relation to any provision for payment by subscribers, and the funding

 

of their own costs, first be subject to an economic and social impact

 

assessment confirming that relevant subscribers are not in practice, by

 

reason of such provision(s) and/or the incidence of costs, prohibited from

 

effectively exercising their rights under 124K Subscriber appeals.’.


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Revised 8 April 2010