Previous Section Index Home Page

2 Dec 2009 : Column 797W—continued


Figures on absconds and a range of other prison performance statistics are available on:


2 Dec 2009 : Column 798W

Legal Aid

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many legal aid lawyers working in (a) family, (b) housing, (c) employment and (d) immigration law were available in each procurement area in each year since 2000. [302191]

Bridget Prentice: The tables containing the information requested have been placed in the Library of both Houses.

Legal Aid: Newcastle-upon-Tyne

Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many applications there have been for (a) civil and (b) criminal legal aid from residents of Newcastle upon Tyne in the last five years. [302460]

Bridget Prentice: Applications for civil legal aid help and advice are made to individual providers. Existing data collection arrangements record the number of instances of advice provided, rather than the number of applications made.

Applications for civil legal aid representation are made to the Legal Services Commission (LSC). The LSC collects data on the number of applications submitted to providers located within the local authority area for Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and this is broken down for each of the past five financial years in table 1 as follows. A proportion of these applications will come from individuals resident outside Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

Table 1: Applications for civil legal aid representation in the local authority area of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
FY Number

2004-05

1,560

2005-06

1,580

2006-07

1,660

2007-08

1,600

2008-09

1,740


Applications for criminal legal aid cannot be identified on the basis of postcode information so it is not possible to provide details of applications submitted from residents in Newcastle-upon-Tyne. However, the LSC can identify the numbers of legal aid applications submitted to Newcastle-upon-Tyne magistrates court since means testing was introduced in October 2006, and these are set out in table 2. These applications include those submitted from defendants charged with an indictable only offence and facing trial before Newcastle-upon-Tyne Crown court. Some of these applications will have been submitted on behalf of individuals who do not reside in Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

Table 2: Legal aid applications submitted to Newcastle-upon-Tyne magistrates court
October to September each year Number

2006-07

6,290

2007-08

6,700

2008-09

6,880


2 Dec 2009 : Column 799W

Offenders: Electronic Tagging

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of electronically monitored offenders on (a) community sentences, (b) bail and (c) release from prison licence (i) deliberately tampered with their tag and (ii) breached their curfew in each year since electronic monitoring was introduced. [302190]

Maria Eagle: We are able to provide data for those electronically tagged, for the last two years. This is shown in the following table. Earlier data are no longer available and obtaining that information would be possible only at disproportionate cost. The table includes the proportion of those who have tampered with their tags or breached their curfews, which are also new starts. These figures represent a percentage of electronic monitoring orders received by the service providers and not individuals.

The data provided are from the electronic monitoring service providers. The information held refers to breaches reported to the courts or to the relevant authority such as probation service, Prison Service, Youth Offending Service, or police, and does not necessarily relate to breach action taken.

Community sentence Bail Post release

April 2007-March 2008

Number of tag tampers

3,250

1,583

703

Proportion who were new starts (percentage)

6.5

6.1

4.5

Number of curfew breaches excluding tag tampers

11,017

10,629

2,144

Proportion who were new starts (percentage)

22.1

42.6

14.0

April 2008-March 2009

Number of tag tampers

3,639

1,580

624

Proportion who were new starts (percentage)

6.6

5.2

4.1

Number of curfew breaches excluding tag tampers

12,664

11,722

2,418

Proportion who were new starts (percentage)

23.1

38.9

16.0


Office for Criminal Justice Reform

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many first time entrants into the criminal justice system there were in each local authority area in each year since 1997. [301480]

Mr. Coaker [holding answer 30 November 2009]: I have been asked to reply.

The data on first time entrants (FTE) to the criminal justice system from 1997 to 1999 are currently unavailable in this format.

FTE data from 2000-01 to 2008-09, by local authority, are published at table 2 here:


2 Dec 2009 : Column 800W

Open Prisons

Mr. Gummer: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many prisoners convicted of murder are held in open prisons; [302249]

(2) how many prisoners serving life sentences are held in open prisons. [302250]

Maria Eagle: At the end of June 2009, the last date for which data is available, there were some 360 life prisoners, including 260 prisoners convicted of murder detained in exclusively open prisons in all the prison establishments in England and Wales.

Prisoners are assessed objectively in a process looking at all aspects of their offending behaviour, actions they have taken to reduce their likelihood of reoffending, and the risk they pose to the public. They are placed in the lowest security category consistent with their assessed risk. Only prisoners placed in the lowest security category (D) may be allocated open conditions.

Transfer of any prisoner to open conditions will only take place if continued detention in closed conditions is no longer necessary for the protection of the public. Open conditions allow prisoners to find work, re-establish family ties and reintegrate into the community. All these are essential components for successful resettlement and an important factor in protecting the public.

These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing, and have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Prison Accommodation

Mr. Gummer: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what criteria are used to determine whether a prisoner is eligible to be held at open prison; and whether a conviction for premeditated murder is an automatic bar to being so held. [302248]

Maria Eagle: There is a well established categorisation and allocation system which aims to ensure that all prisoners are allocated to a prison with a security category consistent with managing their needs in terms of security and control. The categorisation process assesses the risks posed by individual prisoners in terms of: likelihood of escape or abscond; the risk of harm to the public in the event of an escape or abscond and any control issues that impact on the security of the prison and those within it. The risk assessment will take account of issues including: the nature and circumstances of the index offence, any previous convictions, positive and successful efforts to reduce identified risk levels.

Prisoners convicted of pre-meditated murder cannot be held in open prisons on their initial categorisation decision, but may be transferred to open prison conditions at a later stage as part of their sentence progression. Convicted murderers serving life sentences and other indeterminate sentence prisoners will be transferred from closed to open prison conditions only following the decisions of the independent Parole Board. Before making such a decision, the Parole Board must be satisfied that the case meets the criteria set out in the Directions to the Parole Board under section 32(6) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991.


2 Dec 2009 : Column 801W

Prisoner Escapes

Mr. Gummer: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether convicted murderers serving life sentences are considered to be at a high risk of absconding from open prisons. [302120]

Maria Eagle: Any prisoner considered to present a high risk of absconding from open prisons will be held in closed conditions pending further assessments of risk, and systems are in place to achieve this.

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prisoners have escaped from custody (a) during transfer between prisons and (b) in other circumstances in each month of the last five years. [302920]

Maria Eagle: There have been two escapes on an inter-prison transfer in the past five years. These occurred in October 2005 and March 2006.

The following data show the number of prisoners who have escaped from custody in England and Wales between April 2004 and December 2008. The number of escapes from custody has been falling since 1995 when centrally collated records began; this is against the backdrop of an increasing prison population.


2 Dec 2009 : Column 802W
Prisoners escaping from custody between 1 April 2004 to 31 December 2008 by month of escape according to type of escape

Number of escapes from establishment Number of escapes from prison service escort Number of escapes from contractor escort

April 2004

-

2

3

May 2004

1

2

3

June 2004

-

-

2

July 2004

1

1

1

August 2004

1

-

1

September 2004

2

-

4

October 2004

1

1

1

November 2004

1

-

3

December 2004

3

1

4

January 2005

-

-

1

February 2005

2

-

3

March 2005

-

1

2

April 2005

-

1

3

May 2005

-

1

-

June 2005

-

-

3

July 2005

-

2

-

August 2005

1

-

1

September 2005

-

-

3

October 2005

-

3

1

January 2006

2

-

-

February 2006

-

1

2

March 2006

-

-

4

June 2006

1

-

2

July 2006

-

-

2

August 2006

-

-

1

September 2006

1

-

3

October 2006

-

-

1

November 2006

-

-

2

December 2006

-

-

2

January 2007

-

1

1

February 2007

-

-

3

March 2007

-

-

2

April 2007

-

-

2

May 2007

-

-

1

June 2007

-

-

1

August 2007

1

-

3

September 2007

2

-

1

October 2007

-

1

2

November 2007

-

-

2

December 2007

-

-

1

January 2008

-

1

2

March 2008

1

-

1

April 2008

-

-

3

May 2008

-

1

1

June 2008

-

-

1

October 2008

-

1

2

November 2008

-

1

1

December 2008

-

-

3

Notes:
1. Data on escapes from contractor escorts include escorts from police station to court as these are carried out by National Offender Management Service contractors. These figures do not include other police-related escort escapes such as escapes while been transported from point of arrest to police station or transport between police stations.
2. All figures shown are for key performance indicator Escapes recorded as part of the NOMS performance management system.

Next Section Index Home Page