| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
3 Dec 2009 : Column 900W—continued
The following tables show the numbers of UK Regular Service Personnel who are recorded as having a different PStat Cat at the end of the reporting period compared to the start. Any changes between these dates that involve a change from one PSat Cat to another and then reversion back to the former, for example PCat Stat 1 to 3 and then back to 1, is not included.
| Period: 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009 | ||||||
| Male | Female | Total | ||||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Period: 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008 | ||||||
| Male | Female | Total | ||||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
Prior to the introduction of JPA, Personal Status (Marital) Category was not recorded in the same way. Data relating to the marital status, and changes to that status, of service personnel prior to the phased implementation were stored on legacy systems. This information would require a manual search of records and therefore could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Armed Forces: Allergies
Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of the armed forces with nut allergies (a) are serving on operations and (b) have served on operations in the last five years. [303861]
Mr. Kevan Jones: I refer the hon. Member to the written answers I gave to him on 26 November 2009, Official Report, columns 288W-89W.
Where the responsible Medical Officer determines that a member of the armed forces suffers from a nut allergy with a significant risk of anaphylaxis, the member will not be deployed. The total number of individuals with declared nut allergies in the armed forces, presently and historically, whether deployed or otherwise, is not held centrally. It could only be obtained by examining the medical records of all personnel, which could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Armed Forces: Casualties
Damian Green: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many military personnel (a) received serious injuries and (b) had limbs amputated in each of the last five years. [303815]
Mr. Kevan Jones: The MOD is committed to publishing casualty statistics on the number of service personnel wounded on operations. Information on serious casualties sustained since January 2003 (Iraq) and January 2001 (Afghanistan) is available on the MOD website via the following link:
These statistics are updated fortnightly online.
For amputee numbers, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 11 November 2009 , Official Report, column 7MC, to the hon. Member for Castle Point (Bob Spink).
Armed Forces: Theft
Willie Rennie: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what sentences were given to servicemen found guilty of theft of armed forces equipment in each of the last 10 years; [301593]
(2) how many members of the armed forces were convicted of stealing Ministry of Defence equipment in each of the last five years; and what sentences have been handed down in respect of such convictions in each year. [302360]
Mr. Bob Ainsworth [holding answer s 24 and 30 November 2009]: Information from the three services' and Ministry of Defence police's databases for thefts of Ministry of Defence equipment is provided in the following list. Each line reflects one offence and its corresponding punishment.
The information provided pertains solely to thefts of MOD equipment and does not include those cases where the item stolen was not identified.
Information in the years before 2004 is not comprehensive as records relating to the RAF personnel could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
1999: 15 guilty/proven verdicts
Police Caution
Fined £100
Dismissal and 60 days detention
Fined £1,200
Fined £250
112 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £1,500
Dismissal and eight months and 26 days detention
Dismissal and pay suspended to the amount of £239.07
Fined £500
Reduced in rank
140 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £212.17
14 days Restriction of privileges
Dismissal and reduced in rank
82 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £32.61
14 days restriction of privileges
12 months probation and 100 hours community service, £55 costs and disqualified from driving for 12 months
Fined £400 and internal disciplinary action taken
60 hours community rehabilitation over 18 months and £250 costs
Dismissal and 165 days detention, pay suspended to the amount of £1,075 and reduced in rank
Fined £160
112 days detention
140 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £1500
Nine months detention and £1,000 compensation
112 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £383.94
Dismissal
Six months and 24 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £140
Six months imprisonment
59 days detention and reduced in rank
28 days detention
Fined £750
Fined £600
Fined £350
Severe reprimand-mitigated by the Appropriate Review Authority to admonishment
Dismissal and 135 days detention
Seven months detention and pay suspended to the amount of £1,427.17
Six months detention
Dismissal and six months detention
Fined £500
Fined £500
Dismissal, 165 days detention and reduced in rank
Dismissal
82 days detention and reduced in rank
Reduced in rank and pay suspended to the amount of £2,000
2002: 15 guilty/proven verdicts
Fined £1,050 and pay suspended to the amount of £12.66
14 days extra work and drills
140 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £1,250
112 days detention
Six months detention
180 days detention
42 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £106.50
Fined £1,000, severe reprimand, and pays suspended to the amount of £6,043.08
Fined £500
112 days detention
Fined £1,000 and pay suspended to the amount of £1,000
Fined £500
Reduced in rank
Dismissal, 122 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £100
Fined £650
2003: 22 guilty/proven verdicts
Dismissal and 42 days detention and pay suspended for 318 days
Fined £300
Dismissal and 80 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £158.15
Dismissal and three months detention
Dismissal and 66 days detention
Six months forfeiture of seniority and reprimand
Admonished
Fined £50 and pay suspended to the amount of £200
Fined £750
Admonished
Pay suspended to the amount of £2,830.08
Dismissal and two years detention and reduced in rank
56 days detention
112 days detention
Fined £450
Fined £750
28 days detention
42 days detention
Reduced in rank
Fined £650
Fined £650
Reduced in rank
2004: 13 guilty/proven verdicts
Fine of £1,200
28 days detention and paid stopped to the amount of £373.22
Reduced in rank
Fined £500
28 days detention and reduced in rank
26 days detention and reduced in rank
140 days detention
Reduced in rank and fined £4,000
28 days detention and compensation of £3,000 paid
Fined £250
Dismissal
Police caution
Police caution
2005: 15 guilty/proven verdicts
Dismissal and six months detention
Dismissal and 84 days detention
11 months detention and reduced in rank
Dismissal, one year detention suspended and reduced in rank
Dismissal, imprisoned six months and reduced in rank
Fine £300
42 days detention
28 days detention
Pay suspended to the amount of £1,000
84 days detention and pay suspended to the amount of £160
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |