27 Jan 2010 : Column 857W

Written Answers to Questions

Wednesday 27 January 2010

House of Commons Commission

Bars

Michael Fabricant: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what the rules are governing (a) the use by and (b) the admission of guests of (i) hon. Members, (ii) hon. Members' staff and (iii) House of Commons staff in respect of each bar on the House of Commons part of the parliamentary estate. [312634]

Nick Harvey: Bars on the House of Commons part of the parliamentary estate currently available to staff of the House (all grades) and Members' staff are:

Additionally, senior staff of the House of Commons may use the following bar facilities:

Members and up to three guests have access to all the bar facilities listed above. Also, the Members' Smoking Room is provided for the exclusive use of Members of Parliament (Mon-Tue 14.00-17.00 and 18.00-midnight; Weds 14.00-17.00 and 18.00-23.00; Thurs 13.00-17.00 and 18.00-19.00; closed Fridays).

The following bars are provided elsewhere on the parliamentary estate for all parliamentary pass holders, including Members, their staff and all staff of the House of Commons:

Department of Resources

Mr. Laws: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission how much was spent on running costs for the Department of Resources and its predecessors in each year from 2005-06 to 2008-09; what estimate has been made of such costs in 2009-10; and if he will make a statement. [312213]


27 Jan 2010 : Column 858W

Nick Harvey: The direct running costs of the Department of Resources and its predecessor the Department of Finance and Administration have been:

£ 000

Actual Forecast

2005-06

7,596

-

2006-07

6,860

-

2007-08

7,939

-

2008-09

8,753

-

2009-10

8,753

9,922


These figures include staff and directly related accommodation costs, but not other expenditure managed on behalf of the House as a whole. They also exclude ICT infrastructure costs which are managed jointly by the parliamentary ICT for both Houses.

Fluctuations in expenditure represent organisational and other work changes that have arisen during the period. For example, the departmental ICT team was amalgamated into PICT on 1 January 2006, the Internal Audit team transferred to the Office of the Chief Executive on 1 January 2008, and there have been additional resources consumed recently because of FOI, the Legg Review and other Member-related work.

Members: Allowances

Sir Nicholas Winterton: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what remunerated positions Sir Thomas Legg declared prior to his appointment to review payments from the additional cost allowance; and whether Sir Thomas was required to declare the amount of remuneration he receives from such positions. [313437]

Nick Harvey: Sir Thomas Legg has declared the following positions: non-executive director of Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, consultant to Clifford Chance, and Commissioner of the Audit Commission. Sir Thomas was not required to inform the House Administration of the amount of remuneration from these positions.

Justice

Back Office: Central Government

Mr. Todd: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the reasons for the cost of the finance function of his Department's core headquarters referred to in the publication Benchmarking the Back Office: Central Government; and if he will make a statement. [312681]

Mr. Wills: The cost of the finance function for the Ministry of Justice's headquarters is made up of:


27 Jan 2010 : Column 859W

The cost differences reflected in the publication 'Benchmarking the Back Office: Central Government' may have a number of causes including, as the report notes: "different bodies in central Government have very different business models to deliver their different services". I believe that, given the MOJ's business model, this level of headquarters expenditure is reasonable in supporting a wider business area and providing support and challenge to help the board and Ministers to achieve outcomes efficiently.

The MOJ supports the work on benchmarking, and is working with other Government Departments to help us to better understand the variations in costs these data illustrate and to drive further efficiencies across the MOJ through the shared services programme started in July 2009. The MOJ also has plans, annexed to 'Putting the Frontline First', to improve the efficiency of both its finance and human resources functions across its headquarters, agencies and non-departmental public bodies. These include moving all human resources and finance transaction processing into a single shared service.

Convictions: Knives

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people have been (a) charged and (b) convicted of an offence of carrying a knife in each of the last five years. [312767]

Claire Ward: The number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for offences relating to carrying a knife, England and Wales 2003 to 2007 (latest available) is shown in the following table.

The Ministry of Justice do not collect charging data; proceeded against information has been provided in lieu.

Court proceedings data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.


27 Jan 2010 : Column 860W
Number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for offences relating to knife possession( 1) , England and Wales 2003 - 07( 2, 3)

Proceeded against Found guilty

2003

6,928

5,396

2004

7,352

5,890

2005

7,319

6,005

2006

7,699

6,369

2007

7,404

6,169

(1 )Includes the following offences and statutes:
Having an article with blade or point in public place. (Criminal Justice Act 1988 S.139 as amended by Offensive Weapons Act 1996 S.3).
Having an article with blade or point on school premises. (Criminal Justice Act 1988 S.139A (1)(5)(a) as added by Offensive Weapons Act 1996 S.4(1)).
(2) The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(3) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services-Ministry of Justice.

Driving Offences

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average fine given to a person convicted of driving without insurance was in each justice administrative area in each year since 1997. [312817]

Claire Ward: The number of average fines imposed at all courts in England and Wales for using a motor vehicle uninsured against third party risks, by police force area, from 1997 to 2007 (latest available) is given in the table.

Court proceedings data for 2008 are planned for publication on 28 January 2010.


27 Jan 2010 : Column 861W

27 Jan 2010 : Column 862W
Average fine imposed at all courts for offences of using a motor vehicle uninsured against third party risks, by police force area, England and Wales, 1997 to 2007( 1)
Average amount of fines (£)
Police force area 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Avon and Somerset

259

204

164

182

130

133

138

154

154

155

155

Bedfordshire

314

293

274

226

164

169

137

143

156

183

210

Cambridgeshire

220

209

215

182

119

118

131

152

171

182

186

Cheshire

274

248

237

211

149

153

167

179

190

195

224

City of London

332

314

346

374

369

368

334

230

198

214

245

Cleveland

162

167

170

179

167

173

171

189

202

210

216

Cumbria

150

171

220

265

151

151

159

169

171

186

193

Derbyshire

270

279

283

296

337

355

367

367

376

372

379

Devon and Cornwall

184

185

178

179

133

132

127

134

145

150

161

Dorset

295

302

301

261

121

114

125

158

171

176

186

Durham

181

177

194

159

118

122

121

116

123

132

138

Essex

174

149

140

123

101

104

112

164

182

202

217

Gloucestershire

154

201

247

240

91

86

133

148

143

140

156

Greater Manchester

245

226

236

232

152

151

157

167

176

181

186

Hampshire

132

135

138

136

119

122

124

131

138

141

150

Hertfordshire

193

164

173

205

155

166

181

198

208

216

216

Humberside

159

148

143

137

122

132

137

150

180

194

200

Kent

245

241

226

271

209

192

190

197

204

221

223

Lancashire

332

296

237

219

111

113

141

156

169

183

191

Leicestershire

318

318

276

254

134

135

138

150

145

152

163

Lincolnshire

159

197

209

188

133

134

148

179

185

196

202

Merseyside

199

203

200

206

163

167

148

137

141

147

156

Metropolitan Police

202

184

184

169

139

140

143

147

165

179

195

Norfolk

242

256

265

210

99

108

139

152

152

165

167

North Yorkshire

249

236

230

211

130

137

141

160

177

185

193

Northamptonshire

243

286

310

280

280

334

245

183

156

172

175

Northumbria

136

146

148

144

130

135

135

137

142

148

153

Nottinghamshire

164

165

153

150

152

156

152

188

138

147

159

South Yorkshire

194

206

191

169

128

137

146

126

147

143

157

Staffordshire

251

228

234

198

152

163

166

186

230

256

257

Suffolk

192

192

192

185

128

138

133

136

156

162

168

Surrey

243

242

215

218

201

215

221

198

195

217

236

Sussex

218

186

181

167

118

117

138

162

170

169

185

Thames Valley

292

256

268

250

134

135

158

198

206

217

226

Warwickshire

228

175

178

188

157

168

164

210

200

230

229

West Mercia

268

282

282

263

176

180

165

193

208

218

223

West Midlands

207

190

189

201

169

192

200

206

207

211

209

West Yorkshire

255

242

242

208

120

123

134

144

144

146

147

Wiltshire

152

183

186

204

283

286

280

200

208

228

217

Dyfed Powys

183

182

175

169

155

166

172

187

184

191

206

Gwent

253

225

225

208

148

154

170

157

171

172

174

North Wales

209

226

272

230

143

150

149

154

163

173

175

South Wales

190

179

182

188

159

173

158

154

149

158

167

England and Wales

224

214

212

203

150

155

160

169

177

185

194

(1) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are use.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services-Ministry of Justice

Next Section Index Home Page