Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
28 Jan 2010 : Column 1037Wcontinued
Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to the answer of 27 October 2009, Official Report, column 284W, on antisocial behaviour, (1) which 62 areas have been identified as Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership priorities; [303781]
(2) how much additional funding his Department is providing to the 62 priority areas to tackle antisocial behaviour. [303783]
Alan Johnson: The 62 priority areas are those where perceptions of antisocial behaviour are above 25 per cent. They are:
Ashfield
Barking and Dagenham
Barnsley
Basildon
Bassetlaw
Beckley
Birmingham
Blackburn with Darwen
Bolsover
Bradford
Brent
Broxbourne
Burnley
Camden
Cannock Chase
Doncaster
Ealing
Enfield
Greenwich
Hackney
Hammersmith and Fulham
Haringey
Hillingdon
Hounslow
Islington
Knowsley
Lambeth
Liverpool
Luton
Manchester
Mansfield
Medway
Middlesbrough
Newham
North East Lincolnshire
Nottingham
Nuneaton and Bedworth
Oldham
Pendle
Portsmouth
Reading
Redbridge
Rochdale
Rotherham
Salford
Sandwell
Slough
Southampton
Southwark
St. Helens
Stoke-on-Trent
Swale
Tameside
Tamworth
Thanet
Thurrock
Tower Hamlets
Wakefield
Walsall
Waltham Forest
Wellingborough
Wigan
Home Office Delivery Managers will be visiting every priority area to work with them to assess problems and direct local action plans. These will be monitored on a regular basis and improvements are expected by March 2010. These improvements will be expected to be made within the existing resources allocated to every area under the area-based grant.
Mr. Hepburn:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many antisocial behaviour
orders were issued in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) UK in each year since their inception. [313098]
Mr. Alan Campbell: Antisocial behaviour orders (ASBOs) issued on application to magistrates courts and county courts became available on 1 April 1999. ASBOs made following conviction for a relevant criminal offence at the Crown court and at magistrates courts became available on 2 December 2002. The available information is shown in the table.
Information collected centrally by the Ministry of Justice on the number of ASBOs issued only counts those ASBOs issued by courts in England and Wales and is not compiled below Criminal Justice System (CJS) area level.
The number of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) issued all courts( 1) in the North East Government Office Region( 2) (GOR) and England and Wales, 1 April 1999 to 31 December 2007 | ||||||||
Area | Apr1999( 3)( ) Dec . 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
(1) Includes ASBOs issued on application by magistrates' courts acting in their civil capacity and county courts, which became available on 1 April 1999 and ASBOs made following conviction for a relevant criminal offence at the Crown Court and at magistrates' courts (acting in their criminal capacity), which became available on 2 December 2002. (2) The North East Government Office Region consists of the Cleveland, Durham and Northumbria Criminal Justice System (CJS) areas. (3) From 1 April 1999. Notes: 1: Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 2: Previously issued data have been revised. Prepared by Justice Statistics Analytical Services. |
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many alcohol-related incidents were recorded by each basic command unit of Hampshire Constabulary in each of the last five years. [312725]
Mr. Alan Campbell [holding answer 25 January 2010]: The data requested on incidents are not collected centrally. However, the British Crime Survey provides figures for violent incidents where the victim believes the offender was under the influence of alcohol or drugs. This information is provided in the following table:
Taken from table 3.16 at the following link:
Next Section | Index | Home Page |