Previous Section Index Home Page

8 Feb 2010 : Column 787W—continued


Prisons: Mobile Phones

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what recent estimate he has made of the cost of installing a mobile telephone blocker in every prison; and what plans his Department has for their installation in every prison. [312926]

Maria Eagle: National Offender Management Service (NOMS) is currently trialling mobile phone signal blocking technology. Given commercial sensitivity and the fact that pilot projects are testing various technologies, I am
8 Feb 2010 : Column 788W
unable to provide details of the potential cost of installing a mobile phone blocker in all prisons.

As agreed in the Government response to the Blakey report, NOMS will seek to deploy further blockers once the technology has been shown to be effective in prison conditions and as funding allows.

Referendums: Costs

Mr. Grieve: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what recent estimate he has made of the cost of holding a referendum. [316336]

Mr. Straw: Under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 the Electoral Commission is responsible for the conduct of referendums.

The Government have not made a detailed estimate of the likely cost of holding a referendum. We have previously said that, as a guide, we expect the cost of running a UK-wide referendum to be similar to the cost of a general election. In 2005 the general election cost something in excess of £80 million.

There are however, a number of key differences between the running of a general election and the running of a referendum-for example, the role of the Electoral Commission and the entitlements to send communications to voters-and as such the cost of a UK-wide referendum would not be exactly the same as a general election.

Robbery: Convictions

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people in each age group were convicted of robbery in (a) Greater London and (b) England and Wales in each year since 1998. [314996]

Claire Ward: The number of people convicted of robbery in Greater London and England and Wales in each age group for 1998 to 2008 (latest available) are shown in the following table:

Number of persons found guilty at all courts for robbery offences, by age group, from 1998 to 2008( 1, 2, 3)
Greater London
Number of offenders
Type of offence, sex and age group 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008( 1)

Robbery offences

Persons

10 to 11

1

3

3

5

4

2

9

3

8

11

10

12 to 14

94

94

146

240

192

190

240

233

384

498

497

15 to 17

495

495

558

743

669

592

761

870

1,141

1,282

1,063

18 to 20

309

300

276

303

346

318

330

310

417

495

469

21 and over

459

519

473

485

726

736

692

539

629

641

709

Total

1,358

1,411

1,456

1,776

1,937

1,838

2,032

1,955

2,579

2,927

2,748



8 Feb 2010 : Column 789W

8 Feb 2010 : Column 790W
England and Wales
Number of offenders
Type of offence, sex and age group 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008( 1)

Robbery offences

Persons

10 to 11

19

23

31

26

36

33

46

32

29

40

33

12 to 14

412

410

469

681

632

679

695

736

849

993

918

15 to 17

1,739

1,611

1,725

2,085

2,139

1,929

2,223

2,311

2,823

3,082

2,667

18 to 20

1,302

1,235

1,261

1,446

1,480

1,314

1,462

1,387

1,639

1,810

1,753

21 and over

2,070

2,347

2,405

2,584

3,424

3,348

3,055

2,617

2,765

2,904

3,104

Total

5,542

5,626

5,891

6,822

7,711

7,303

7,481

7,083

8,105

8,829

8,475

(1) Excludes convictions for Cardiff magistrates court for April, July and August 2008.
(2) The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(3) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services-Ministry of Justice.

Cabinet Office

Census

Mr. Hurd: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office pursuant to the answer of 3 December 2009, Official Report, column 956W, on the Census, if she will place in the Library a copy of the data-sharing agreement with (a) Local Government Information House, (b) the Royal Mail and (c) Ordnance Survey. [315172]

Angela E. Smith: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated 4 February 2010:

Mr. Hurd: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office pursuant to the answer of 3 December 2009, Official Report, column 951W, on the Census, if she will place in the Library a copy of the Information Commissioner's response on the privacy impact assessment. [315173]

Angela E. Smith: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Stephen Penneck:

Mr. Hurd: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office pursuant to the answer of 3 December 2009, Official Report, column 951W, on Census, if she will place in the Library a copy of each written submission made to the Office for National Statistics on the Census by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. [315174]

Angela E. Smith: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Stephen Penneck, dated 4 February 2010:


Next Section Index Home Page