Previous Section Index Home Page

9 Feb 2010 : Column 943W—continued

Operation Black Vote

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what recent meetings he has had with representatives of Operation Black Vote. [315925]


9 Feb 2010 : Column 944W

Bridget Prentice: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor last met with members of Operation Black Vote on 2 June 2008 when he gave a speech at the Operation Black Vote Magistrates' Shadowing Scheme Graduation. In addition, I spoke at an Operation Black Vote organised event on 20 January 2010 to celebrate the appointment of the 50th graduate of the Magistrates' Shadowing Scheme to be appointed to the magistracy.

Prison Sentences

Mr. Burns: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people received an indeterminate sentence for public protection with a tariff of 23 months or less under the new exceptional circumstances legislation (a) between 14 July and 31 December 2008 and (b) in 2009; [316648]

(2) how many prisoners serving an indeterminate sentence for public protection are two years or more past the expiry of their tariff date; [316649]

(3) how many prisoners serving an indeterminate sentence for public protection had a tariff of 23 months or less before July 2008 and are now in an open prison; [316650]

(4) how many prisoners serving an indeterminate sentence for public protection are in an open prison; [316651]

(5) how many people received an indeterminate sentence for public protection with a tariff of two years in (a) 2005, (b) 2006, (c) 2007, (d) the period 1 July to 14 January 2008, (e) the period 14 July to 31 December 2008 and (f) 2009. [316652]

Maria Eagle: Table 1 as follows shows the number of offenders who have received an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for public protection (IPP), if they are over 18 years of age, or a detention for public protection (DPP), if they are under 18 years of age, with a tariff of two years or less, as calculated from date of sentence to the date of tariff expiry, for the period up to 31 December 2009.

The following table is broken down by year, except for 2008 which is further broken down up to and at 14 July 2008 and after 14 July 2008. The figures shown are as notified to the National Offender Management Service at 5 February 2010.

Table: 1
Year of sentence Number sentenced (with a tariff of 2 years or less

2005

215

2006

550

2007

563

1 January 2008-14 July 2008

290

15 July 2010-31 December 2008

78

2009

158

Total

1854


These figures include those sentenced to an IPP who subsequently had their sentence quashed or died. These figures are drawn from a total of 6047 cases recorded over this period. A further 17 cases over this period are still awaiting the courts setting a tariff.


9 Feb 2010 : Column 945W

From 14 July 2008 the provisions in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 took effect, in that an IPP may not be passed where the minimum tariff is less than two years, except where offenders have been convicted of very serious crimes in the past, as specified in Schedule 15A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

As at 5 February 2010, the number of prisoners in custody, serving an IPP or a DPP, and who are recorded by the National Offender Management Service as being two years or more past the expiry of their tariff was 476. This figure includes IPP prisoners who have been released and subsequently recalled.

As at 5 February 2010, there were 197 prisoners serving either an IPP or DPP and who are in open conditions.

Of these, 118 have a tariff of two years or less, as calculated from date of sentence to the date of tariff expiry.

These figures include those prisoners being held within the juvenile and female estates.

The figures to answer each question were taken from the Public Protection Unit Database (PPUD) in the National Offender Management Service, and, as with any large scale recording system, it is subject to possible errors arising from either data entry or processing. The PPUD is a live database, updated on a regular basis. As a result, snapshots taken in consecutive days will contain differences reflecting updates.


9 Feb 2010 : Column 946W

Pyramid Selling

Mr. Heathcoat-Amory: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prosecutions for breaches of the prohibition on chain gifting under section 43 of the Gambling Act 2005 there have been since the entry into force of that provision. [315715]

Claire Ward: Section 43 of the Gambling Act (chain gifting) came into force on 1 September 2007. Up to 31 December 2008 (latest currently available) no prosecutions for offences under this section of the Gambling Act have been reported to the Ministry of Justice.

Data for 2009 are planned for publication at the end of January 2010.

Robbery: Milton Keynes

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people in each age group in Milton Keynes were convicted of robbery in each year since 1997. [315370]

Claire Ward: Information showing the number of persons found guilty of robbery in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System area, broken down by age group, from 1997 to 2008 (latest available) is shown in the table.

Court proceedings data are not available below Criminal Justice System area level. Data for 2009 are expected to be published in the autumn 2010.

Number of persons found guilty at all courts for robbery offences in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System area, by age group, from 1997 to 2008( 1,2)
Number of offenders
Type of offence 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Robbery offences

Persons

10 to 11

-

-

-

1

2

3

3

-

1

1

-

-

12 to 14

6

7

9

10

10

19

10

8

13

7

14

14

15 to 17

51

28

27

40

43

72

49

50

46

64

59

80

18 to 20

49

52

34

30

48

65

51

48

65

47

67

52

21 and over

52

34

36

57

84

114

99

89

78

70

74

96

Total

158

121

106

138

187

273

212

195

203

189

214

242

(1) The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
(2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
Source:
Justice Statistics Analytical Services-Ministry of Justice

Thanet

Dr. Ladyman: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will set out, with statistical information related as directly as possible to South Thanet constituency, the effects on South Thanet of the policies and actions of his Department since it was established. [315634]

Mr. Wills: The Ministry of Justice's work spans criminal, civil and family justice, democracy, rights and the constitution. Every year around nine million people use our services in 900 locations across the United Kingdom, including 650 courts and tribunals and 139 prisons in England and Wales.

The range of the Department's policies and actions is wide and the statistical information relating to it is not normally collected on a constituency basis. Consequently, some of the information requested in the question cannot be provided in the form requested except at a disproportionate cost.


9 Feb 2010 : Column 947W

In addition, at a national level:


9 Feb 2010 : Column 948W

Theft: Milton Keynes

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people resident in Milton Keynes were convicted of an offence of (a) handling stolen goods and (b) fraud and forgery in each year since 1997. [315371]

Claire Ward: Information showing the number of persons found guilty of (a) handling stolen goods and (b) fraud and forgery in each year between 1997 and 2008 (latest available) in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System area, broken down by age group, from 1997 to 2008 (latest available) is shown in the following tables.

Number of persons found guilty at all courts in the Thames Valley Criminal Justice System area for offences of handling stolen goods and fraud and forgery, by age group, from 1997 to 2008( 1, 2)
Number of offenders
Type of offence: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Handling stolen goods

Persons

10 to 11

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

12 to 14

8

8

8

17

10

17

8

5

8

9

8

4

15 to 17

43

60

76

65

71

72

44

39

49

35

35

33

18 to 20

110

105

103

116

83

82

57

51

42

50

44

42

21 and over

314

330

311

249

247

286

259

199

212

169

178

170

Total

475

503

498

447

411

457

368

294

312

263

265

249


Next Section Index Home Page