The table includes mainly one-off cases where there are specific factual reasons for changes in rateable value well outside of the norm. In some cases the publication of draft valuations has brought forward new information and valuations—either 2005, 2010 or both—have been amended accordingly. Otherwise reasons for change relate to the unique circumstances of individual valuations; examples include removal of temporary reductions in rateable value or changes in domestic elements.

The five-yearly business rates revaluations make sure each business pays its fair contribution and no more by ensuring that the share of the national rates bill paid by any one business reflects changes over time in the value of its property relative to others. The 2010 revaluation will not raise a single extra penny for Government.

10 Feb 2010 : Column 1037W

Over a million properties will see their business rate liabilities come down as a result of revaluation. The Government have put in place a £2 billion relief scheme to limit the impact on the minority with bill increases, which in 2010-11 will ensure no business property sees its rates bill increase by more than 11 per cent. as a result of the revaluation, with maximum increases capped at just 3.5 per cent. for small properties. That is on top of the wider support available to help ease business pressures including discounted rate bills for small businesses and deferring tax payments.

Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst of 5 January 2010, Official Report, column 238W, on non-domestic rates, what the (a) postcode and (b) percentage change in rateable values was of each of the 50 individual hereditaments. [311833]

Barbara Follett: The following table gives the 50 hereditaments in the South East, with their post codes, which showed, as at 29 May 2009, the largest percentage increase in rateable value between the compilation of the 2005 and the 2010 Ratings List. It also shows the percentage change in each hereditament’s bill between 2005 and 2010 after transitional relief has been applied, but before other reliefs.

The figures in the table are based on those in the Department’s 2009 consultation document entitled: “The Transitional Arrangements for the Non-Domestic Rating Revaluation 2010 in England”. A copy of this can be found at:

http://www.voa.gov.uk/publications/statistical_releases/VOA_Statistics_Release_Final.pdf

RankPercentage change in rateable valuePercentage change in bill as a result of revaluation after transitional relief(1)Postcode

1

(2)

3.5

RH17 6EB

2

(2)

3.5

ME15 6JX

3

(2)

3.5

KT18 6DY

4

4,567

3.5

CT5 2AW

5

2,600

3.5

SO31 8GD

6

2,471

3.5

PO18 8TH

7

2,025

3.5

MK17 9LR

8

1,708

3.5

ME20 7TP

9

1,650

3.5

PO36 0NY

10

1,633

3.5

ME13 7TS

11

1,614

3.5

PO20 7HZ

12

1,333

3.5

OX3 0BX

13

1,275

3.5

GL7 3QS

14

1,267

3.5

SO22 6AA

15

1,158

11

RG1 4QA

16

1,100

11

TN22 1UN

17

1,054

3.5

CR3 5DQ

18

1,041

11

BN22 7LD

19

1,040

3.5

SO51 8BU

20

1,023

3.5

TN5 1PT

21

963

11

KT15 1NN

22

900

3.5

CT15 5AF

23

900

3.5

PO22 9NQ

24

900

3.5

TN32 5NY

25

858

3.5

PO37 6BN

26

833

3.5

SP10 5DD

27

800

3.5

CT7 0HW

10 Feb 2010 : Column 1038W

28

792

11

RG4 5AU

29

785

11

BN2 5UZ

30

775

3.5

SO41 8AN

31

744

3.5

TN29 9JH

32

742

11

SL1 5NL

33

717

3.5

RG17 7DR

34

714

11

BN10 7ET

35

714

11

SL1 3HS

36

690

11

TN37 7RD

37

690

11

RH6 0HJ

38

688

3.5

CT9 4LB

39

681

11

PO35 5SZ

40

650

3.5

OX26 2GN

41

650

3.5

PO20 7HY

42

643

11

PO6 1RU

43

638

11

TN11 9PE

44

633

3.5

TN26 2PZ

45

633

3.5

BN15 8ES

46

633

3.5

BN15 8ES

47

633

3.5

BN15 8ES

48

633

3.5

BN15 8ES

49

633

3.5

BN15 8ES

50

633

3.5

BN15 8ES

(1) The percentage change in rate bills will not be the same as the, percentage change in rateable value. The Government’s £2 billion relief scheme will cap increases in 2010-11 rate bills as a result of revaluation at no more than 11 per cent. and just 3.5 per cent. for small hereditaments. (2) These three hereditaments had zero rateable value in the 2005 Rating Lists.

The table includes mainly one-off cases where there are specific factual reasons for changes in rateable value well outside of the norm. In some cases the publication of draft valuations has brought forward new information and valuations—either 2005, 2010 or both—have been amended accordingly. Otherwise reasons for change relate to the unique circumstances of individual valuations; examples include removal of temporary reductions in rateable value or changes in domestic elements.

The five-yearly business rates revaluations make sure each business pays its fair contribution and no more by ensuring that the share of the national rates bill paid by any one business reflects changes over time in the value of its property relative to others. The 2010 revaluation will not raise a single extra penny for Government.

Over a million properties will see their business rate liabilities come down as a result of revaluation. The Government have put in place a £2 billion relief scheme to limit the impact on the minority with bill increases, which in 2010-11 will ensure no business property sees its rates bill increase by more than 11 per cent. as a result of the revaluation, with maximum increases capped at just 3.5 per cent. for small properties. That is on top of the wider support available to help ease business pressures including discounted rate bills for small businesses and deferring tax payments.

Planning Obligations

Grant Shapps: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate his Department has made of the proportion of affordable housing made available under section 106 agreements in 2008-09. [316808]

10 Feb 2010 : Column 1039W

Mr. Ian Austin: Figures from the Department for Communities and Local Government show that in 2008-09, 55,770 new affordable homes were provided in England, of which 32,290 (58 per cent.), were either fully or partially funded using section 106 contributions.