Previous Section Index Home Page

Hon. Members: Object.

RESIGNATION OR REMOVAL OF CHAIRS OF SELECT COMMITTEES

Motion made,

Hon. Members: Object.

ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF SELECT COMMITTEES

Motion made,

Hon. Members: Object.

NOMINATION OF SELECT COMMITTEES

Resolved,

REDUCTION IN SIZE OF SELECT COMMITTEES

Ordered,

SELECT COMMITTEES (ROLE, RESOURCES AND TASKS)

Resolved,

BACKBENCH BUSINESS COMMITTEE

Motion made,

Hon. Members: Object.

SEPTEMBER SITTINGS

Resolved,

ENGAGING THE PUBLIC WITH LEGISLATION

Resolved,


22 Feb 2010 : Column 131

PETITIONS REQUIRING DEBATE

Resolved,

ELECTRONIC PETITIONS

Resolved,

DEBATES ON PETITIONS

Resolved ,

INFORMATION FOR PETITIONERS

Resolved,

PRESENTATION OF PUBLIC PETITIONS

Resolved,

PRIVATE MEMBERS' MOTIONS

Resolved ,


22 Feb 2010 : Column 132

PETITION

Canvey War Memorial Fund

10.3 pm

Bob Spink (Castle Point) (Ind): Having just debated the importance of petitions, I am delighted to present- [ Interruption. ]

Mr. Speaker: Order. I do not wish to interrupt the hon. Gentleman. We have had a substantial and stimulating debate, but I appeal to Members who are leaving the Chamber and who, unaccountably, do not wish to listen to the hon. Member for Castle Point (Bob Spink) presenting his petition please to do so quickly and quietly.

Bob Spink: Thank you, Sir. I am delighted to present this massive new petition on Canvey Island's war memorial. It was prepared by Mr. Rob Finch-a valiant Army veteran-the excellent and caring Canvey Royal British Legion and the war memorial committee. Castle Point people feel that the borough council has been arrogant and uncaring in its attitude to the removal of the original war memorial. These memorials are important. They do not belong to remote Tory councillors; they belong to the people-in this case, the people of Canvey Island. This and other Canvey matters should be dealt with on Canvey Island by excellent Canvey councillors.

The petition states:

[P000737]


22 Feb 2010 : Column 133

Total Place Programme (High Peak)

Motion made, and Question proposed, That this House do now adjourn. -(Mrs. Hodgson.)

10.5 pm

Tom Levitt (High Peak) (Lab): I am grateful, Mr. Speaker, for the opportunity to hold this debate. Let me say at the outset that I believe that the Department's Total Place concept is a very fine objective and process. My only criticism is that it should have been in place many years ago.

As I understand it, Total Place looks at the sum total of public services available within a geographical area. It looks for crossovers between local government, central Government and Government agencies, and how location and other elements of co-working can be best employed to deliver high quality services more efficiently than before. Pilots are being conducted in various places across the country, even if they are not being conducted in my constituency.

I will say more about Total Place in a few minutes, but first I hope that my hon. Friend the Minister and you, Mr. Speaker, will indulge me if I say a little about the totality of services in High Peak. This is a particularly poignant moment for me as I am standing down at the forthcoming election. It is possibly the last substantial chance that I shall have to tell the House about the incredible developments that have taken place in High Peak during 13 years of a Labour Government.

For example, across High Peak crime has fallen consistently and strongly every year since Labour came into office. We have more police officers in Derbyshire than ever before-up from 1,791 in 1997 to 2,119 today-and the way in which they are organised into Safer Neighbourhood teams is impressive. It is the start-I repeat, only the start-of genuine community policing operating within every community and serving those communities by both tackling crime and increasing community confidence, and it provides the mechanism for making that local policing much more accountable to ordinary people.

That is important. I recently contributed to a report by my right hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Brightside (Mr. Blunkett) into accountability in policing. Our very strong conclusion was that the most important level of accountability was at the community level, with the police telling people what is available and people telling officers what is needed. One way to do that is through better local authority scrutiny of policing and other non-local authority services, perhaps in the same way as local involvement networks-LINks-in the health service are being set up to do. I was delighted when the current Home Secretary accepted the proposals in full in his recent White Paper on policing.

I shall single out a few people for special mention. The first is Lee Baker. I hope that Lee is not an exceptional police community support officer because he symbolises for me exactly what police community support officers are about. He is a genuine man of the people, he cares about communities, he is a friendly face in New Mills whom people can approach, and he is not afraid to engage in the less sympathetic side of the job. I congratulate Lee Baker, Chief Constable Mick Creedon and all the others in between. I also say a special thank you to Janet Birkin for her leadership of Derbyshire police authority over some years which, like my tenure, will come to an end this summer.


Next Section Index Home Page