Previous Section Index Home Page

2 Mar 2010 : Column 1066W—continued


Wales

Future Jobs Fund: Wales

Mrs. Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for Wales which companies in Wales have made successful applications to the Future Jobs Fund; how many jobs have been created in respect of each application; when the jobs enabled by each application were advertised; and how many such vacancies have been filled. [318135]

Mr. Hain: The following organisations were successful in bidding for Future Jobs Fund money in Wales, with the number of jobs expected to be created in brackets:

These bids will bring a total of 9,945 jobs to Wales over the next 18 months.

Advertisement and recruitment into these positions is an ongoing process. Statistics for the number of starts are not yet available but are being collated by the Department for Work and Pensions.

Justice

Departmental Energy

Dan Rogerson: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps his Department plans to take to participate in the Earth Hour event on 27 March 2010. [319097]

Mr. Wills: Throughout the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), as part of our continuing efforts to reduce energy consumption, staff are regularly reminded to turn off computers, monitors and other electrical equipment, unplug mobile phone chargers and switch off lights when rooms are not in use. As the 2010 Earth Hour event is on Saturday 27 March, many of our buildings will be unoccupied. The MoJ HQ estate will participate through contractors turning off any lighting not required and ensuring meeting room co-ordinators check video link screens and televisions are not left on standby.

The MoJ will publicise the Earth Hour event to staff through the staff Intranet.

Departmental Theft

Mr. Watson: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many thefts from his Department have been recorded in the last two years. [318996]

Mr. Wills: The Department records theft and other losses, but does not separately distinguish between the two for reporting purposes. The centrally recorded thefts and losses during the last two financial years for the Department and its predecessor, the Department for Constitutional Affairs (created in May 2007), including its agencies and other offices, are:


2 Mar 2010 : Column 1067W

Number

2007-08

116

2008-09

203


The number of such cases involving theft could be provided only at disproportionate cost. This detail is recorded in individual incident records held locally by the Department's various agencies and other business areas. The increase in the number of incidents is believed to be due to the increased awareness of the requirement for reporting, arising from the Data Handling Review.

Ex-Servicemen: Prison

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether people (a) whose date of birth was unavailable, (b) sent to prison before 1979 and (c) who had been reservists counted for the purposes of his Department's determination of the number of veterans in jails in England and Wales. [319840]

Maria Eagle: The methodology used by Defence Analytical Services and Advice (DASA) to estimate the proportion of armed forces veterans in prison was published on the DASA website:

on 25 January 2010.

The report describes in some length and detail who was contained in databases held by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), the variables used in the matching process and the advantages and disadvantages of the approach taken.

As date of birth was a required variable only those records that contained a date of birth were used. This amounted to around 81,000 valid records from the prison database and around 1.3 million valid records from the MOD database.

The date of the prison population extract taken to inform the matching work was 6 November 2009. If a person sent to prison before 1979 was still in prison on this date then their record would have been used in the matching process.

Reservists were not included in the matching process.

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) whether people (a) whose first name was unavailable, (b) under the age of 18 years, (c) who had changed their names on marriage and (d) known to use aliases were counted for the purposes of his Department's determination of the number of service veterans in prison; [319555]

(2) what the prison population was when his Department made its determination of the number of service veterans in the prison system; [319556]

(3) what his most recent estimate is of the number of service veterans in HM Prison (a) Manchester, (b) Durham and (c) Everthorpe; [319557]

(4) what his most recent estimate is of the number of service veterans under the supervision of the probation service on (a) court orders and (b) parole. [319558]


2 Mar 2010 : Column 1068W

Maria Eagle: The methodology used by Defence Analytical Services and Advice (DASA) to estimate the proportion of Armed Forces veterans in prison was published on the DASA website

on 25 January 2010.

The report describes in some length and detail who was contained in databases held by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), the variables used in the matching process and the advantages and disadvantages of the approach taken.

The date of the prison population extract taken to inform this work was 6 November 2009. The total number of people in prison in England and Wales was 84,522. However, as only sentenced and remand prisoners aged 18 and over were matched, the denominator used was 81,071. Non criminal prisoners and those aged under 18 were excluded from the matching process.

No estimate of veterans in individual prisons has been made because this was outside the scope of the project.

The MoD and MoJ are currently working to estimate the proportion of armed forces veterans under the supervision of the Probation Service. Results will be published when complete.

Freedom of Information

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) whether the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 apply to documents relating to the administrative duties conducted on behalf of HM Courts Service by (a) the Lord Chief Justice, (b) the Master of the Rolls and (c) other judges; [319050]

(2) whether his Department accepts legal responsibility for the custody and control of documents relating to the administrative duties conducted on behalf of HM Courts Service by (a) the Lord Chief Justice, (b) the Master of the Rolls and (c) other judges. [319051]

Mr. Wills: Members of the judiciary do not carry out administrative duties on behalf of HM Court Service. There are accordingly no documents relating to such duties.

The Department does hold some information created by the judiciary in the course of discharging their judicial functions, and there may be occasions when the judiciary hold information on behalf of the Department. The Department's legal obligations in respect of such information under the Data Protection Act 1998, the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Public Records Act 1958 will depend on the facts of any given case.

Juries

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people summoned for jury service in Milton Keynes declined to carry out their service for each reason in each year since 1997; [319004]

(2) how many people (a) were summoned for and (b) undertook jury service in Milton Keynes in each year since 1997. [319005]


2 Mar 2010 : Column 1069W

Bridget Prentice: The following table shows, on a national level basis for each calendar year from 2000 to 2008, the following:

The Jury Central Summoning Bureau (JCSB) is not able to supply the information for Milton Keynes as the data cannot be extracted in this way by the computer system.


2 Mar 2010 : Column 1070W

Data are organised under postal catchment areas to different Crown courts. Therefore residents from Milton Keynes could be summoned to either Aylesbury or Luton Crown court, which also covers other postal areas.

Members of the public summoned for jury service cannot decline to carry out jury service. However, a juror can apply to defer their jury service to a more suitable date within the forthcoming 12-month period if the original date is not convenient. Jurors can apply to be excused from jury service but their application must show good cause why they should be excused from attending.

Calendar year end

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Total number of summons issues

79,115

579,473

492,561

461,980

431,432

388,154

390,671

412,666

416,689

Total number of jurors supplied to the court

24,907

187,080

197,599

184,833

187,114

185,193

181,966

182,661

183,506

Deferred to serve at a later date

8,860

61,435

59,786

59,528

65,754

63,741

61,254

66,174

66,806

Number refused deferral

22

214

297

340

288

286

172

122

103

Excused

by right having served in past two years

4,700

32,368

29,120

28,247

14,887

4,333

4,277

4,518

4,244

child care

3,410

27,685

26,281

24,327

19,497

15,741

15,690

16,118

15,711

work commitments

2,781

26,640

25,628

19,373

14,961

14,419

15,998

16,428

16,857

medical

5,650

44,435

40,982

35,061

34,016

32,239

30,332

32,416

31,289

travel difficulties

186

2,394

1,811

1,110

813

672

720

651

690

student

736

5,468

5,899

3,979

2,438

2,150

2,209

2,273

2,429

moved from area

1,549

11,073

6,254

3,419

2,498

2,181

2,454

2,988

2,543

language difficulties

849

5,921

5,928

5,260

4,975

4,081

4,030

4,406

4,165

other

2,521

20,678

22,354

22,400

23,103

21,658

24,126

27,784

30,606

All excused

22,382

176,662

164,257

143,176

117,188

97,474

99,836

107,582

108,534

Number refused excusal

421

2,494

1,927

3,453

4,344

3,585

2,053

1,641

1,515

Disqualified-residency, mental disorders, criminality

15,248

118,339

105,314

98,045

89,112

77,364

85,061

94,171

96,325

Disqualified-on selection

5,989

48,271

59,892

58,830

55,410

49,765

53,031

58,900

59,017

Disqualified-failed Police National Computer (PNC) check

0

69

160

139

148

193

185

207

225


Next Section Index Home Page