|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
|All IPP or DPP sentenced for rape 2004( 1) to 2009|
|Sentence date||Total||Average tariff years|
|All life sentenced prisoners sentenced for rape 2004 to 2009|
|Sentence date||Total||Average tariff years|
|(1 )Indeterminate sentences for public protection introduced from 2005.|
1. There were a total of 959 sentences of Rape Section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, Rape (section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956) and Rape of a Child Under 13 (section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003) reported to NOMS and recorded on PPUD from the period 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2009.
2. There are a total of eight tariffs unavailable because they have not been set yet, the warrant is not available or the offender received a whole life tariff. These relate to four IPPs and four life sentenced prisoners.
3. These are included in figures to show how many were sentenced in each financial year but have been removed for the purpose of the tariff calculation.
4. The figures were taken from the Public Protection Unit Database (PPUD) in the National Offender Management Service, and, as with any large scale recording system, it is subject to possible errors arising from either data entry or processing. The PPUD is a live database, updated on a regular basis. As a result, snapshots taken in consecutive days will contain differences reflecting updates.
Information showing the number of persons found guilty of robbery in the Dorset police
force area, by age group, from 1997 to 2008 (latest available) is shown in the following table.
Court proceedings data are not available at parliamentary constituency level, therefore data have been provided in
the table for the Dorset police force area in which the constituency of Poole is situated.
|Number of persons found guilty at all courts for robbery( 1 ) offences in the Dorset police force area, by age group, from 1997 to 2008( 2,3)|
|(1) Includes robbery and assaults with intent to rob under the Theft Act 1968 S.8. (2) The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. (3) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice.|
Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to the evidence given to the Home Affairs Select Committee by Mr. Sebastian Conran, Home Office Design and Technology Alliance on 2 February 2010, if he will commission a home security assessment to include in the home information pack for the sale of the Government House, South Eaton Place. 
Dr. Evan Harris: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of completed applications for representation on form EEA1 were dealt with within service standards in each month since January 2009. 
January 2009: 5 per cent.
February 2009: 4 per cent.
March 2009: 4 per cent.
April 2009: 12 per cent.
May 2009: 33 per cent.
June 2009: 91 per cent.
July 2009: 82 per cent.
August 2: 79 per cent.
September 2009: 33 per cent.
October 2009: 46 per cent.
November 2009: 46 per cent.
December 2009: 56 per cent.
It should be noted that UKBA's Case Information Database does not differentiate between single EEA1 applications and those linked to a related EEA2 (family member) application, the figures above include all linked EEA2 cases.
Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what proportion of those convicted of an offence of selling alcohol to a minor received (a) a fine, (b) a community sentence, (c) a custodial sentence and (d) an alternative punishment in England and Wales in each year since 1998; and what the (i) lowest, (ii) highest and (iii) average fine was in each such year. 
Alan Johnson: The disposals for those convicted of an offence selling alcohol to a minor are set out within Table 1. The average, maximum and minimum fines in relation to sales to a minor are set out in Table 2.
|Sentences for offences of selling alcohol to a minor, 1998 to 2008|
|(1) S.146 Licensing Act 2003. (2 )Not applicable. (3) S.147 Licensing Act 2003. (4) SS.169A & 169B Licensing Act 1964 as amended by Licensing (Young Persons) Act 2000. (5) Prior to the Licensing Act 2003 sale of alcohol to a person under 18 for consumption off the premises was included under this statute. (6) S.181A (1) Licensing Act 1964 as added by Licensing Act 1988 S.17. (7) S.147A Licensing Act 2003 as added by Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006. Note: 1. The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were sentenced. When a defendant has been sentenced for two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. 2. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. Source: Justice Statistics-Analytical Services, Ministry of Justice. Ref: SENT(JSAS)040-10 (15/02/2010).|
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|