Previous Section Index Home Page

15 Mar 2010 : Column 624W—continued


This is an updated table which includes data from three venues that had not reported when figures were announced in January.

Tourism: Olympic Games 2012

Mr. Ellwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much funding his Department plans to provide to promote the tourism opportunities provided by the London 2012 Olympics. [321916]

Margaret Hodge [holding answer 12 March 2010]: The Department is providing £130 million between 2008-09 and 2010-11 to VisitBritain (VB) and VisitEngland (VE) for marketing Britain as a tourist destination overseas and England as a tourist destination to the domestic market (and some overseas markets). In addition, public funding support for UK tourism from the Regional Development Agencies, local authorities, the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Executive also need to be taken into account. This is likely to exceed £2 billion in the current spending review period.

VB has recently launched its marketing strategy for 2012 which is currently resourced from the above allocation. In addition, public funding support for tourism supports programmes that focus on improving training and skills within the industry, the quality of accommodation and our welcome to the world. These are an integral part of the Government's strategy to help tourism maximise the opportunities presented by the 2012 games.

House of Commons Commission

Members' Staff: Pensions

Tony Lloyd: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what discussions the House of Commons Commission has had with the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority on the system of pensions for staff of hon. Members; and if the Commission will make it its policy to continue the Portcullis Pension Plan for staff alongside any new system of allowances and expenses for hon. Members brought in by the Authority. [322025]

Nick Harvey: The Speaker, on behalf of the Commission, discussed the future of the Portcullis Plan with the Interim Chief Executive of IPSA, Andrew McDonald, at their meeting on 16 February. The Commission has agreed that the House Service will continue to administer the Portcullis Pension Plan, including making it available to new members of Members' staff, subject to review when IPSA takes on some responsibility for Members' pensions. Members will fund the employer's contribution
15 Mar 2010 : Column 625W
from their staffing budgets and the Chair of IPSA has said these will be set at a level which allows for appropriate pension contributions to be made. IPSA will make the necessary deductions from the staff payroll. IPSA has agreed to follow the House's current arrangements for the plan, under which a single standard employer contribution rate of 10 per cent. of total salary is paid; and staff are automatically enrolled in the plan unless they opt out. The House's Pensions Unit will liaise with IPSA officials to ensure co-ordination of their work. The Commission believes this agreement will provide reassurance to existing and new Members' staff, and to Members themselves.

Members: Allowances

Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission pursuant to the answer of 1 March 2010, Official Report, column 837W, on Members: expenses, what the estimated cost is of each change of use of offices referred to in the answer; and from which budget this expenditure will come. [320974]

Nick Harvey: Planning for the series of moves which will culminate in the conversion of 1 Derby Gate into accommodation for use by Members and their staff is only at an early stage, and costs for the later projects in the series have yet to be worked up. The first leg, involving the move of the Department of Resources to Tothill street, will involve prior building work of around £3.9 million. The cost of removals is expected to be £77,000.

Nurseries

Mr. Chope: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission pursuant to the answer of 9 March 2010, Official Report, column 185W, on nurseries, whether the full business case for the replacement of Bellamy's Bar, the Astor Suite and Bellamy's Clubroom by a day nursery will be submitted to (a) the Finance and Services Committee and (b) the House of Commons Commission before any decision is taken to proceed with the works. [322376]

Nick Harvey: No. Neither the Finance and Services Committee nor the House of Commons Commission considers business cases. The Commission's decision that a nursery facility should be established is subject to the business case being approved by the Clerk of the House as Accounting Officer.

Mr. Chope: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission whether the works proposed to convert Bellamy's Bar, the Astor Suite and Bellamy's Clubroom into a day nursery will be subject to competitive tender. [322398]


15 Mar 2010 : Column 626W

Nick Harvey: Yes.

Mr. Chope: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission pursuant to the answer of 9 March 2010, Official Report, column 185W, on nurseries, if he will place in the Library a copy of the full business case for the replacement of Bellamy's Bar, the Astor Suite and Bellamy's Clubroom by a day nursery with the commercially confidential information redacted. [322399]

Nick Harvey: No. It is not the practice to put business cases into the public domain.

Health

Accident and Emergency Departments: Birmingham

Richard Burden: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of patients spent more than four hours in accident and emergency departments in Birmingham in each year since 1997. [321536]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: The information is not available in the format requested. However, information on the percentage of patients in accident and emergency departments in Birmingham, that were seen within four hours, for 2003-10 is shown in the following table:

Percentage of patients seen within four hours

2003-04

89.7

2004-05

96.8

2005-06

98.2

2006-07

98.2

2007-08

98.4

2008-09

97.9

2009-10

98.2

Note:
The hospitals these data relate to are: Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Good Hope Hospital NHS Trust, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.
Source:
Department of Health dataset quarterly monitoring of accident and emergency.

Cancer: Health Services

Tony Lloyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many and what percentage of suspected cancer patients resident in (a) the City of Manchester and (b) Manchester Central constituency saw an NHS consultant within two weeks of referral in each year since 1997. [322292]

Ann Keen: The information is not available in the format requested. The information that is available is shown in the following table.


15 Mar 2010 : Column 627W

15 Mar 2010 : Column 628W
Number and percentage of suspected cancer patients seeing a consultant within two weeks of general practitioner (GP) referral
Central Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Quarter Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage

2001-02

Q1

81

90.0

992

95.9

230

94.3

5

83.3

Q2

68

85.0

1,072

94.9

277

93.9

0

0.0

Q3

100

93.5

1,100

98.1

282

95.9

3

100.0

Q4

80

87.9

1,158

99.6

260

91.9

3

100.0

2002-03

Q1

95

88.0

1,215

98.8

230

92.4

5

83.3

Q2

125

98.4

1,240

99.1

308

96.0

-

-

Q3

165

100.0

1,325

98.4

497

99.8

6

85.7

Q4

135

100.0

1,190

95.8

320

98.8

4

80.0

2003-04

Q1

109

100.0

1,214

92.2

336

97.1

3

75.0

Q2

128

99.2

1,174

94.9

388

98.2

5

100.0

Q3

151

100.0

1,276

97.6

371

99.2

3

100.0

Q4

176

99.4

1,186

97.4

340

100.0

-

-

2004-05

Q1

170

100.0

1,263

98.6

428

99.8

-

-

Q2

267

100.0

1,314

99.8

336

100.0

1

100.0

Q3

275

99.6

1,475

100.0

388

99.7

-

-

Q4

209

100.0

1,371

99.9

383

100.0

-

-

2005-06

Q1

274

100.0

1,567

100.0

466

100.0

1

100.0

Q2

304

100.0

1,517

99.9

304

100.0

-

-

Q3

298

100.0

1,505

100.0

430

100.0

-

-

Q4

305

100.0

1,564

99.9

588

100.0

1

100.0

2006-07

Q1

334

100.0

1,746

99.9

615

99.8

1

100.0

Q2

359

99.7

1,681

99.9

684

100.0

-

-

Q3

374

99.7

1,857

100.0

744

100.0

-

-

Q4

356

99.4

1,898

99.9

678

100.0

4

100.0

2007-08

Q1

391

100.0

1,795

100.0

813

100.0

2

100.0

Q2

366

100.0

1,821

100.0

813

100.0

1

100.0

Q3

220

100.0

1,873

100.0

846

99.9

1

100.0

Q4

354

99.2

1,873

100.0

832

100.0

-

-

2008-09

Q1

431

99.8

2,182

100.0

881

100.0

-

-

Q2

316

100.0

2,307

100.0

875

99.9

-

-

Q3

325

100.0

2,065

99.9

870

99.8

1

100.0

Q4

461

98.3

2,275

96.3

882

98.5

-

-

2009-10

Q1

476

93.7

2,217

95.1

1,087

97.1

1

100.0

Q2

437

94.0

2,236

93.2

1,047

96.8

-

-

Q3

386

96.5

1,987

94.9

1,058

97.7

-

-

Notes:
1. 2001-02 data for Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust are based on aggregate figures for hospital sites covering Rochdale, Bury, Oldham and North Manchester, which existed as separate hospital trusts at the time.
2. The methodology for collecting cancer waiting times data changed from 1 January 2009 to bring reporting in line with practice under the 18 weeks programme.
Source:
Department of Health, Cancer Waiting Times database.

Next Section Index Home Page