Previous Section Index Home Page

17 Mar 2010 : Column 853W—continued


These figures include all regular and reservist personnel, and include personnel repatriated to countries outside of the UK.


17 Mar 2010 : Column 854W

Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations

Angus Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether he has received reports of UK armed forces' Bowman radio equipment being recovered from Taliban combatants in Afghanistan. [321729]

Bill Rammell: The Ministry of Defence has not received reports of Bowman radio equipment belonging to UK armed forces being recovered from the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Air Force: Military Aircraft

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many RAF aircraft of each type were (a) in service, (b) in the forward fleet and (c) fit for purpose on the latest date for which figures are available. [319493]

Bill Rammell: The information requested is shown in the following table. The figures shown are the average for January 2010 and have been rounded to the nearest aircraft.

"In service" has been taken to mean the effective fleet, which includes all aircraft barring those which are redundant, declared as surplus or awaiting disposal. The Forward Fleet comprises aircraft which are serviceable and those which are short-term unserviceable. Short-term unserviceable aircraft are undergoing minor works, forward maintenance or any other unforeseen rectification work that can arise on a day-to-day basis. Serviceable aircraft available to the front-line commands for operational and training purposes on a given date are termed available. The number of aircraft available in individual fleets varies according to normal fleet management activities including requirements for mandated maintenance and upgrade programmes and the larger variations are explained in the table.


17 Mar 2010 : Column 855W

17 Mar 2010 : Column 856W
Aircraft type In service fleet Forward fleet Available Notes

BAe 146

2

1

1

BAe 125

6

6

4

C-17

6

5

4

Dominie

9

7

5

Harrier

74

50

48

The Harrier fleet continues to progress with the GR9 upgrade programme.

Hawk T1

129

85

68

A number of Hawk T1 aircraft are being held in long-term storage for future use by the RAF Aerobatic Team (Red Arrows) and others require depth servicing.

Hawk T2

17

6

3

Hawk T2 aircraft being held are in storage pending the introduction of a new flying training course.

Hercules C130K

14

7

5

A number of aircraft in the K fleet were in depth maintenance.

Hercules C130J

24

18

12

For the J Fleet, aircraft were in depth maintenance, on trials or undergoing unscheduled maintenance or rectification after returning from operational theatres.

Nimrod MR2

6

5

2

The number of aircraft in the service fleet is being reduced as the out of service date approaches. Other issues include work generated through safety inspections and to maintain serviceability.

Nimrod R1

2

1

1

One Nimrod R1 has been retired and is awaiting disposal.

Sentinel

5

3

1

The Sentinel fleet was affected by a technical issue, which is now being resolved.

Sentry

5

4

2

The Sentry fleet had an unanticipated requirement for fleet engine changes in December which was still being implemented during January.

Tornado F3

22

12

12

Tornado F3 numbers are being reduced as the aircraft is progressively withdrawn from service.

Tornado GR4

137

102

98

Tristar

9

5

3

Tucano

93

47

32

A number of Tucano aircraft are being held in long term storage as they are not required for training purposes.

Typhoon

64

42

40

Tranche 2 aircraft deliveries continue and some of the in-service fleet are currently undergoing a process of upgrade.

VC10

15

13

6

As a result of the severe weather conditions during January there were occasions when aircraft movements around the airfield were reduced. As a consequence aircraft repairs and maintenance tasks took longer than normal thereby reducing availability.

Vigilant

65

64

64

Viking

82

81

81


Armed Forces: Bomb Disposal

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much has been spent on explosive ordnance disposal (a) training and (b) equipment from (i) his Department's core budget and (ii) the contingency reserve in each year since 2005. [321706]

Bill Rammell: The Ministry of Defence's accountancy systems do not support calculations of aggregate expenditure on all explosive ordnance disposal equipment and training over the last five years. A complete answer to the question could therefore be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Armed Forces: Cadets

Daniel Kawczynski: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much funding has been allocated to cadet forces in Shrewsbury for 2010-11. [322273]

Mr. Kevan Jones: The information is not held centrally.


17 Mar 2010 : Column 857W

Funding for any particular area comes from a wide variety of sources including the single services, the use of subsidised facilities, and local donations and fundraising efforts. To determine how much funding has been allocated to a specific unit would require a manual search of records and would therefore incur disproportionate cost.

The Government remain committed to the Cadet Organisation whose origins date back 150 years. It is one of the oldest and most successful voluntary youth organisations in the world. Today it numbers 131,000 young people, led by 25,000 adult volunteers, in well over 3,000 sites across the country.

Armed Forces: Discharges

Dr. Murrison: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many and what proportion of personnel of each of the armed forces were administratively discharged in each year since 2001. [320773]

Mr. Kevan Jones [holding answer 5 March 2010]: The term administrative discharge is applied to those service personnel who are to be dismissed from the armed forces for which there is no specific exit category. Service personnel may be administratively discharged as a result of a range of factors including: civil conviction, failing to maintain a level of physical fitness to pass a fitness test despite undertaking remedial training, financial mismanagement, persistent poor conduct and failing a random drug test. The following tables provide information on the total administrative outflow since 2001:

Table 1: Administrative discharges in respect of the naval service
Naval service Administrative discharge Proportion of all discharged (percentage)

2001-02

1,500

28.4

2002-03

1,420

29.6

2003-04

1,320

28.3

2004-05

1,350

29.6

2005-06

1,130

25.9

2006-07

1,000

23.1

2007-08

1,090

24.6

2008-09

660

23.0


Table 2: Administrative discharges in respect of the Army
Army Administrative discharge Proportion of all discharged (percentage)

2001-02

6,460

45.5

2002-03

6,950

48.5

2003-04

7,230

50.7

2004-05

6,940

47.1

2005-06

6,070

43.1

2006-07(1)

6,750

47.7

2007-08

(2)-

(2)-

2008-09

(2)-

(2)-

(1) Data are for an 11 month period from legacy systems prior to JPA.
(2) Not held centrally.


17 Mar 2010 : Column 858W
Table 3: Administrative discharges in respect of the Royal Air Force
Royal Air Force Administrative discharge Proportion of all discharged (percentage)

2001-02

750

16.5

2002-03

990

23.3

2003-04

1,210

29.9

2004-05

940

25.3

2005-06

730

15.9

2006-07(1)

1,660

32.7

2007-08

1,950

38.7

2008-09

1,360

31.6

(1) Introduction of new administrative discharge procedures under Queen's Regulations
Note:
Data have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Next Section Index Home Page