Previous Section Index Home Page

25 Mar 2010 : Column 534W—continued


Justine Greening: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many drug treatment and testing orders were (a) issued for each reason to and (b) breached by offenders aged (i) 12, (ii) 13, (iii) 14, (iv) 15, (v) 16, (vi) 17, (vii) 18 and (viii) 19 years old in each year since 2002. [323892]

Claire Ward: I have been asked to reply.

The available information is provided in the following table.

Data for 2009 will be available when Sentencing Statistics 2009 is published later this year.

The Courts Proceeding database does not record information on reasons why these orders have been issued, other than the offence committed.

Due to data quality issues we are unable to provide information on breaches. Work is currently under way to resolve this.

The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The community order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.

The drug treatment and testing order was replaced by the drug rehabilitation requirement of the community order under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, from April 2005, for offenders aged over 18.

Total number of drug treatment and testing orders issued for offenders aged 12 to 19, 2002-08
Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

12

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

13

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

14

0

(1)1

0

0

0

0

0

15

0

0

0

0

0

(1)1

0

16

20

30

14

11

5

4

1

17

49

38

33

25

7

6

2

18

92

104

142

54

6

3

1

19

182

183

202

108

6

0

0

(1) Drug treatment and testing orders are not available for offenders aged under 16. These records are likely to be data errors, resulting from incorrect recording of age or disposal. Notes:
1. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. 2. This data has been taken from the Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database. This data is presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe. 3. The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The Community Order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.

Justine Greening: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department with reference to the answer of 15 March 2007, Official Report, column 563W, on young offenders, how many (a) volunteers, (b) (i) full-time and (ii) part-time practitioners, (c) sessional staff, (d) administration staff, (e) managers, (f) student and trainees and (g) others were working for youth offending teams in each London borough in each year since 2002. [323895]

Maria Eagle: I have been asked to reply.

The Youth Justice Board collects figures on the number and type of staff working at each Youth Offending Team at the beginning of each financial year. The table shows information from 2004-05 as this was the first year in which this data was collected. The figures include vacant posts.

The table shows the figures on (a) volunteers, (b) (i) full-time and (ii) part-time practitioners, (c) sessional staff, (d) administration staff, (e) managers, (f) student and trainees and (g) others working at each Youth Offending Team at the beginning of each financial year.


25 Mar 2010 : Column 535W

25 Mar 2010 : Column 536W

25 Mar 2010 : Column 537W

25 Mar 2010 : Column 538W

25 Mar 2010 : Column 539W

25 Mar 2010 : Column 540W

a b (i) b (ii) c d e f g Total

2008-09

Barking and Dagenham

19

33

0

0

5

5

0

0

62

Barnet

19

18

10

0

1

7

1

0

56

Bexley

23

11

4

1

2

2

0

0

43

Brent

0

25

2

0

7

8

1

0

43

Bromley

24

26

3

8

7

5

0

0

73

Camden

0

26

13

0

8

7

0

0

54

Croydon

51

34

7

14

9

12

0

0

127

Ealing

0

23

6

3

6

10

0

0

48

Enfield

28

38

2

0

7

5

0

0

80

Greenwich

0

22

9

0

9

9

0

0

49

Hackney

0

64

5

0

14

9

0

0

92

Hammersmith and Fulham

50

34

2

4

8

6

2

0

106

Haringey

30

42

7

7

19

5

0

0

110

Harrow

40

17

8

12

7

4

1

0

89

Havering

37

19

6

10

5

3

0

0

80

Hillingdon

28

26

0

14

6

5

2

0

81

Hounslow

19

21

6

26

7

6

0

0

85

Islington

27

30

0

2

7

4

0

0

70

Kensington and Chelsea

24

23

4

1

3

5

0

0

60

Kingston-upon-Thames

0

9

2

0

2

4

0

0

17

Lambeth

24

47

0

0

8

10

0

0

89

Lewisham

42

34

9

1

8

5

0

0

99

Merton

40

15

5

7

4

4

0

0

75

Newham

0

56

1

0

9

12

0

0

78

Redbridge

0

34

6

0

9

9

1

0

59

Richmond-upon-Thames

36

6

9

1

2

3

0

0

57

Southwark

113

69

6

16

21

23

0

0

248

Sutton

43

15

5

2

3

4

0

0

72

Tower Hamlets and City of London

82

34

11

11

8

5

0

0

151

Waltham Forest

0

29

0

8

7

5

0

0

49

Wandsworth

26

21

7

17

6

6

1

0

84

Westminster

0

28

2

2

6

6

0

0

44

2007- 0 8

Barking and Dagenham

40

31

4

22

5

7

2

0

111

Barnet

25

12

7

2

2

5

0

0

53

Bexley

22

14

6

1

3

2

0

0

48

Brent

0

24

4

12

8

5

0

0

53

Bromley

0

27

0

2

7

3

0

0

39

Camden

0

32

6

2

8

5

0

0

53

Croydon

42

39

0

12

8

7

1

0

109

Ealing

33

29

2

10

8

4

0

0

86

Enfield

28

35

2

0

10

4

0

0

79

Greenwich

0

26

8

0

8

6

1

0

49

Hackney

35

43

8

2

14

13

0

0

115

Hammersmith and Fulham

50

34

4

4

8

6

2

0

108

Haringey

0

41

13

0

16

5

0

0

75

Harrow

55

15

8

13

7

3

1

0

102

Havering

31

19

5

12

4

3

0

0

74

Hillingdon

47

25

1

16

4

5

1

0

99

Hounslow

19

22

4

26

6

6

0

0

83

Islington

0

23

2

6

5

5

0

0

41

Kensington and Chelsea

25

22

4

0

3

5

1

0

60

Kingston-upon-Thames

11

10

5

0

1

2

0

0

29

Lambeth

54

43

2

9

12

9

0

0

129

Lewisham

43

38

3

0

4

5

1

0

94

Merton

50

15

3

5

3

4

2

0

82

Newham

14

47

1

3

14

11

2

0

92

Redbridge

0

30

6

0

9

10

2

0

57

Richmond-upon-Thames

99

7

8

4

1

4

0

0

123

Southwark

113

90

6

16

21

6

4

0

256

Sutton

35

13

7

0

2

4

1

0

62

Tower Hamlets and City of London

51

20

1

8

11

4

0

0

95

Waltham Forest

0

29

3

2

9

4

0

0

47

Wandsworth

49

24

5

30

5

5

1

0

119

Westminster

15

40

0

0

6

2

2

0

65

2006-07

Barking and Dagenham

16

29

1

22

6

6

1

0

81

Barnet

32

17

4

12

4

3

2

0

74

Bexley

22

15

4

2

3

2

0

0

48

Brent

35

24

2

14

10

7

0

0

92

Bromley

35

16

6

0

2

2

0

0

61

Camden

0

29

9

1

8

5

2

0

54

Croydon

48

36

1

19

8

7

0

0

119

Ealing

34

23

4

12

6

4

1

0

84

Enfield

23

32

2

0

10

3

0

0

70

Greenwich

0

21

6

5

7

6

0

0

45

Hackney

33

35

4

2

11

4

1

0

90

Hammersmith and Fulham

34

27

4

4

8

8

2

0

87

Haringey

28

38

12

36

11

6

4

0

135

Harrow

52

11

4

10

6

4

2

0

89

Havering

39

18

7

20

5

3

0

0

92

Hillingdon

47

25

0

11

5

5

1

0

94

Hounslow

22

19

1

24

6

5

2

0

79

Islington

0

23

2

6

5

5

0

0

41

Kensington and Chelsea

17

20

2

6

5

3

1

0

54

Kingston-upon-Thames

48

7

4

0

0

2

1

0

62

Lambeth

55

46

1

0

14

3

0

0

119

Lewisham

69

38

2

0

6

4

2

0

121

Merton

35

13

2

0

3

3

2

0

58

Newham

48

59

0

16

22

17

4

0

166

Redbridge

0

28

7

0

10

8

1

0

54

Richmond-upon-Thames

66

7

10

4

2

2

1

0

92

Southwark

113

74

6

16

21

6

5

0

241

Sutton

118

15

3

0

2

4

0

0

142

Tower Hamlets and City of London

37

24

1

13

9

4

2

0

90

Waltham Forest

31

27

2

0

7

4

0

0

71

Wandsworth

57

25

5

21

4

4

2

0

118

Westminster

15

40

o

0

6

2

2

0

65

2005-06

Barking and Dagenham

12

26

6

16

7

7

1

0

75

Barnet

2

1

16

3

4

2

13

0

41

Bexley

13

15

3

2

3

2

1

0

39

Brent

22

24

0

15

9

5

1

0

76

Bromley

22

18

4

9

2

2

0

0

57

Camden

0

23

6

3

8

5

4

0

49

Croydon

38

31

2

18

8

7

0

0

104

Ealing

0

23

12

7

6

3

0

0

51

Enfield

0

17

2

11

11

3

0

0

44

Greenwich

0

21

4

1

7

4

0

0

37

Hackney

2

27

3

1

8

6

0

0

47

Hammersmith and Fulham

23

28

2

4

7

5

2

0

71

Haringey

27

30

7

77

12

4

1

0

158

Harrow

40

10

6

12

7

4

0

0

79

Havering

18

17

2

8

4

2

1

0

52

Hillingdon

24

21

1

12

3

3

0

0

64

Hounslow

32

19

1

16

6

5

0

0

79

Islington

25

21

1

4

5

3

0

0

59

Kensington and Chelsea

26

20

2

2

3

3

0

0

56

Kingston-upon-Thames

10

7

4

3

0

2

0

0

26

Lambeth

0

38

1

0

9

4

0

0

52

Lewisham

71

40

2

0

5

4

2

0

124

Merton

36

10

2

0

2

5

2

0

57

Newham

0

61

0

5

20

20

3

0

109

Redbridge

0

25

5

1

9

9

0

0

49

Richmond-upon-Thames

113

10

10

11

3

4

1

0

152

Southwark

106

64

6

20

20

6

4

0

226

Sutton

104

12

2

0

3

4

0

0

125

Tower Hamlets and City of London

22

22

0

12

7

5

3

0

71

Waltham Forest

31

28

0

0

7

3

0

0

69

Wandsworth

58

24

4

10

3

4

0

0

103

Westminster

0

34

2

0

6

2

1

0

45

2004-05

Barking and Dagenham

0

18

0

8

4

3

0

0

33

Barnet

1

2

3

4

12

2

2

0

26

Bexley

5

15

3

4

2

2

0

0

31

Brent

0

17

5

0

7

6

0

0

35

Bromley

28

14

2

9

5

2

0

0

60

Camden

16

21

9

0

5

4

2

0

57

Croydon

123

27

6

0

7

4

0

0

167

Ealing

0

23

12

7

6

3

0

0

51

Enfield

45

27

2

0

7

4

0

0

85

Greenwich

0

21

4

2

5

5

1

0

38

Hackney

2

23

3

8

6

4

2

0

48

Hammersmith and Fulham

0

33

11

5

0

4

2

0

55

Haringey

36

42

6

13

12

5

3

0

117

Harrow

55

11

6

15

5

5

1

0

98

Havering

28

20

0

10

4

2

1

0

65

Hillingdon

18

17

3

11

3

3

0

0

55

Hounslow

42

15

4

15

4

5

0

0

85

Islington

62

22

2

4

6

5

6

0

107

Kensington and Chelsea

16

17

1

1

4

4

0

0

43

Kingston-upon-Thames

0

8

1

0

2

2

0

0

13

Lambeth

49

36

3

35

11

13

2

0

149

Lewisham

0

24

4

0

16

4

3

0

51

Merton

44

16

1

0

3

2

0

0

66

Newham

0

48

1

0

12

6

7

0

74

Redbridge

0

30

0

0

8

5

1

0

44

Richmond-upon-Thames

67

10

9

5

2

2

0

0

95

Southwark

0

61

4

0

17

4

5

0

91

Sutton

0

10

5

0

2

3

0

0

20

Tower Hamlets and City of London

25

21

0

11

7

5

1

0

70

Waltham Forest

0

14

1

3

6

5

0

0

29

Wandsworth

47

16

5

4

3

4

0

0

79

Westminster

0

30

1

0

5

2

0

0

38


Next Section Index Home Page