Beyond Decent Homes - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 160-166)

MR DAVID ORR, MR ANDY DOYLEND AND MR BRUCE MOORE

9 NOVEMBER 2009

  Q160  Mr Betts: You have talked about problems with the national standard; there might be a problem if we do not have one that actually we will not get anything at all, but in terms of Decent Homes, the basic standards for Decent Homes for thermal efficiency is pretty low. Presumably your organisations, in looking at your Decent Homes works, have actually adopted higher standards than the Decent Homes. Can you explain what you have done in terms of standard thermal efficiency so far? Obviously in terms of insulation the other thing that Councillor McCann mentioned as being a big problem is that of the efficiency of boilers and people on low incomes. The boilers are over 20 years old, they work but if you put a new one in you would cut people's heating bills by half overnight. Have you done any of that sort of work so far?

  Mr Doylend: Definitely. We have a minimum SAP rating that we have across the stock. We use SAP as a benchmark for bringing stock up to a minimum SAP rating of 61. There is a programme of works to bring it up to that level and we are using experiments around ground source heat pumps, looking at different technologies but ultimately you have to look at every property in isolation to see what is the construction, is it an area where it cannot have gas it has to be on electric or oil heating, what is the standard of the property generally? You have to pick up a package of repairs and refurbishment that meets that property's needs. One size just does not fit all.

  Q161  Andrew George: In terms of energy efficiency, it is not just about climate change it is also about the affordability. Even if you cannot afford to undertake the kinds of improvements you are talking about, even just getting something like smart meters which actually helps the tenant to try to drive down their own costs, even if you cannot do it for them surely that would help.

  Mr Doylend: We also invest in education, that is probably the right way of putting it. Some people who are nominated in, it is their first home, they have no experience of getting running costs down and we invest quite a lot of money through the Sustainable Communities Investments to educate people on how they can best run their homes and minimise the cost.

  Q162  Chair: Can we get onto some questions about the Tenants Services Authority which we have not asked the others. How should the TSA regulate the Decent Homes standards after 2010 and how positive do you feel about the steps it has taken already since its establishment?

  Mr Orr: The truth of the matter here is that this is one of the three areas where the TSA is subject to the direction of government. It is actually quite difficult at this stage to know how in future a regulator will respond to the direction of government. We are in the middle of a debate with the Tenants Services Authority at the moment about crafting the standards framework. The formal consultation on that does not begin until the end of this week or the beginning of next week so there is as yet no consultation document in the public domain, although privately we have been involved in a number of conversations with the TSA about how that standards framework might develop. I have to say that I am reasonably encouraged by what seems to me to be a fairly rational approach being taken by the TSA which is about saying absolutely have a minimum standard but there needs to be a real and clear determination at a local level for landlords and their tenants to be working together to develop local standards.

  Q163  Chair: Are the TSA consulting with individual housing associations or with the overall organisations?

  Mr Orr: Their consultations which will be launched at the end of this week or the beginning of next week will be a wide consultation that will involve all social housing providers as well as bodies like the Federation.

  Q164  Chair: Up until now?

  Mr Orr: It has been a fairly wide pre-consultation conversation.

  Mr Moore: Hanover is one of 36 pilots which are about the approach to regulation and our pilot is about devolved decision making and how that works in a regulatory environment. As David said, it is early days at the moment; we are hoping that the TSA will endorse relevant, proportionate, focussed regulation but we are putting our submissions in, showing our residents' views and monitoring the reactions to that so that is us feeding into that process.

  Q165  Chair: I understand that one of their proposed national standards is quality of home; what does it mean?

  Mr Orr: I suspect it means the Decent Homes standard, at least for the time being.

  Mr Moore: I think the potential is for landlords asking their tenants to say what is it they want and what is it you are unhappy about and putting measures in above a basic minimum standard to address those criteria and actually the issue would be then if a landlord had not asked their residents that question, that is when the regulation would come in. Rather than saying what it should be, it should be: have you asked and are you responding to what you have had fed back to you. That is Hanover's approach and others are adopting it.

  Q166  Chair: Mr Doylend, is that your understanding?

  Mr Doylend: I totally agree, yes.

  Chair: I think we will draw this session to an end. Thank you very much indeed.







 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 23 March 2010