Press standards, privacy and libel - Culture, Media and Sport Committee Contents


Examination of Witness (Question Numbers 300-302)

MR TIM FULLER

19 MARCH 2009

  Q300  Janet Anderson: When you say the meeting was in May, that was a long time after this started. Do you think they should have done that sooner?

  Mr Fuller: Maybe so. Maybe it should have been done after suicide number five. There was another incident a week or two after Angeline and then others cropped up during the subsequent months. A lot of work has been done. At the time everybody was at a bit of a loss. The Health Service was at a loss because this was going on in our community. Why are these people not being helped? Anyone in a normal state of mind does not take their life so what have we missed? The press had built their story from these incidents and it was obviously mushrooming. It is great if you have a story that you can add incidents to. From the point of building a story it is great because it keeps it going but it is a very personal and sensitive story. It is not about old buildings falling down or car crashes; it is something sensitive and horrible. Maybe the PCC could have done something earlier. Maybe somebody did not raise the flag.

  Q301  Paul Farrelly: Have you looked back over the coverage from when it started before your daughter's death at all?

  Mr Fuller: The only thing I have done is try to see whether there were Coroner's Inquest reports. Occasionally I have looked over the internet to see if there is anything.

  Q302  Paul Farrelly: From your experience was there one newspaper driving this?

  Mr Fuller: I could not say. I have not looked at it in that depth. The thing is that every newspaper carried the article. I have not focused in on the names of others and done any research to see if there is any pattern. Occasionally I type my daughter's name into a search engine and the same articles come up again right back from last year. Probably in four or five years' time they will still be there because that is how the internet is. You put something on there and unless it is physically deleted it is there forever. I must say most of the pictures have gone but there are a few still around. When that other incident happened with the girl who died some weeks after, I felt an affiliation with her relatives knowing that picture was out. Before coming here today I thought I will see if I can find that article to back up what I was going to say but I could not find it. I could not find the picture. I can still see it in my mind. I thought that is good it is not there. I would like to think three months ago I would have found it and some work has been done and that is the result. I am quite impressed that I could not find the picture. I cannot say that anything specifically has driven it but it is a good point that somebody maybe leading it but I have not done any research.

  Chairman: That is probably all we have to cover. Can I thank you for coming and talking to us.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 23 February 2010