DE 10
Letter from Ian Godden, Chairman A|D|S to the Rt. Hon James Arbuthnot, Chairman of Defence Select Committee, re: follow up issues raised concerning R&D and MoD salaries compared with those of industry.
Dear Chairman
In giving evidence to the House of Commons Defence Select Committee on 8 December 2009, I was asked about the proportion of research and development on defence equipment that is funded by industry while Ian King referred to the difference between MoD salaries and those in industry. You requested that our panel follow up on these two questions.
Please find below information below on R&D investment by industry as well as data on salaries in BAE Systems and how these compare with MoD.
Research & Development Annual survey data from A|D|S in 2008 showed
that the industry in the
BAE Systems Below is BAE Systems' benchmark data for the following functions:
· Project/Programme Management · Commercial · Procurement · Engineering (this includes all Engineering roles as Systems Engineering is not split out specifically)
These relate to the company's new grading structure - known as Watson Wyatt or WW grades - which is progressively being introduced. It has not yet been introduced in the more junior executive grades, which are referred to as Exec grades 3 and 4. An explanation is below:
· WW17 - Management Committee level of business · WW16 - Leader · WW15 - Leader · Exec3 - Manager · Exec4 - Senior Professional
It is difficult to be precise about analogue MoD grades, but we would estimate that WW17 probably equates to the first rung in the Senior Civil Service. The lower grades knock on in consequence, but there is no direct read across to lower civil service grades.
Against that background, the data below gives the approximate salary ranges (in £1,000s) for roles within BAE Systems.
Ian Godden Chairman, A|D|S
19 January 2010
|