The proposals for national policy statements on energy - Energy and Climate Change Contents


APPENDIX 1

PRECOGNITION BY STEVE RASHLEIGH MONTREATHMONT PUBLIC INQUIRY

  1.  My name is Steve Rashleigh, my wife and I live at White House Barn, North Drove, Bicker Fen PE20 3BQ. Our home is on the Fens and has two and a half acres of land. Our family run a double glazing business.

2.  During the summer Wind Prospect erected thirteen REpower 2mw wind turbines at Bicker Fen. From the beginning they were noisy. We complained and were told it was early days and it was only a temporary problem. When the remaining turbines were erected and it was operating properly there would not be a problem.

  3.  We waited but when the development was completed the noise problem was worse.

  4.  Our home is approximately 800m from the closest turbine. It is a barn conversation and has buildings on three sides. The noise seems to enter the courtyard and bounce round the buildings. The noise we experience sounds just like an old steam train.

  5.  The noise is almost constant as the noise we receive comes with the prevailing wind.

  6.  We were told that we would not notice the noise so much when it was windy. This is not the case, when it is windy the noise is very much worse. It is a thumping noise like an old steam train coming in.

  7.  During the day when we are moving around and the television is on, it is bearable. At night it is not. The thumping noise just goes on all night. Sometimes it is impossible for us to get to sleep.

  8.  We have done everything we can to try to kill the noise. We already had double glazing but, at our own expense, we installed 6mm secondary double glazing. We now have four layers of glass at our windows. This has reduced the noise a little but it is still unbearable at night. Unfortunately our bedroom windows face the turbines.

  9.  We have also spent £1,000 and planted trees between us and the turbines but of course it will be some time before we know whether they will have an effect on the level of the noise.

  10.  We wrote to Wind Prospect and asked them whether they would pay for these trees but they did not reply.

  11.  We have spent a considerable sum to try and reduce the noise from the windfarm and have received no help whatsoever from the developers/operator.

  12.  In contrast, when E.On built a substation near to other properties to take the power from the turbines to the grid they provided eight neighbouring properties with double glazing free of charge—We know this is correct because our company installed the double glazing.

  13.  Although the noise is the main problem we have with these turbines we also suffer from shadow flicker.

  14.  We can suffer shadow flicker for over an hour. It is very difficult to cope with this. We close the curtains but you can still see the shadows flickering. We are particularly concerned about the shadow flicker as our son is epileptic. He is not living at home at the moment but we have to be very careful when he visits.

  15.  We have complained to Trevor Gait of Fenland Wind Farms/Wind Prospect but he has done nothing.

  16.  We have complained repeatedly to Boston Borough Council. They have been reluctant to act but at last we understand that they are now obliging Fenland Wind Farms to commission a noise investigation. This is due to commence on 6 December 2008. We cannot understand why they are allowing the turbine developer to undertake this survey. We believe this should have been commissioned by the Council and undertaken by independent noise consultants.

  17.  At the moment life is unbearable and we are worried that in the event we ever wished to sell our home it would not be possible to find a buyer.

  18.  We are very disappointed with the lack of concern shown by Wind Prospect/Fenland Wind Farms and hope that between them and Boston Borough Council something will be done to reduce the noise and shadow flicker and improve the quality of our lives.

  19.  In view of the problems we have experienced, we wish to warn people of what can happen and at the same time object to the Montreathmont development. We were assured that noise would not be a problem and this has not been the case. This Company is obviously unable to ensure that noise is not a problem with their turbines and we do not believe that they should be allowed to erect further turbines until they have resolved the problems at their existing operating developments.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 23 March 2010