The proposals for national policy statements on energy - Energy and Climate Change Contents


Further supplementary memorandum submitted by Friends of the Earth

  With your permission, Friends of the Earth would like to offer two brief observations on the oral evidence presented to the Energy and Climate Change Committee on Wednesday 20th January 2010, in regard to energy-from-waste plants in the Renewables NPS. In particular we focus these comments in response to Mr Asquith's and Ms Hartnell's answers to Question 296 (Mr Weir).

1.  It may be the case that Mr Asquith's company does have the equipment to maximise recycling and to produce a biomass-only fraction which they intend to use to produce energy. However, it is important to note that this is not the case with the mainstream incineration industry, which is the one most likely to be using the NPS process. There are already two NPS applications from Covanta to build very large incinerators of mixed waste. This mixed waste will inevitably include large amounts of fossil-fuel derived carbon, and large amounts of material that would be better recycled, and will be burnt in an inefficient incinerator with consequent CO2 emissions (see "Dirty Truths" report).[81] We would therefore argue that Mr Asquith's reply does not provide adequate reassurance that such plants would not damage reuse and recycling, the lower carbon options.

  2.  On the idea that incineration and high recycling go "hand in hand", it is true that those countries that moved early in getting material out of landfill tended to focus on both of these approaches. However, many of them are now encountering a problem from incessant demand from incinerators preventing improvements in recycling. Denmark is a particularly good example, where regions with high incineration have lower recycling whilst regions with low incineration do more recycling:


Region
Recycling
Incineration
Landfill

Hovedstaden
21%
77%
2%
Nordjyllnad
29%
63%
8%
Sjælland
31%
59%
10%
Midtjylland
40%
53%
7%
Syddanmark
41%
52%
6%

2005 data for Denmark's household waste, from Waste Centre Denmark (Storage for incineration classified with incineration)


  It's further worth noting that Denmark's recycling rate (41% municipal waste in 2009) is well behind levels achieved by other regions of Europe. For example Flanders in Belgium recycles more than 70% of its municipal waste—they have achieved this over the last ten years, focussing their policies on prevention, reuse and recycling, and they have deliberately avoided creating any additional incineration capacity due to their concerns that this would impact on recycling rates.

February 2010






81   Friends of the Earth Dirty Truths (2006) http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/dirty_truths.pdf. This is a summary of Eunomia (2006), A changing climate for energy from waste, www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/changing_climate.pdfBack


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 23 March 2010