Adapting to Climate Change - Environmental Audit Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted from the British Geological Survey (BGS)

1.  SUMMARY

  1.1 This response from the British Geological Survey (BGS) to the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) inquiry of adaptation to climate change sets out:

    — A brief background to the BGS and its role in supporting government policy in earth sciences and environmental management.— Comments on elements of the National Audit Office (NAO) report prepared for EAC.

    2.  BACKGROUND

      2.1 The BGS is part of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), and is the nation's principal supplier of objective, impartial and up-to-date geological expertise and information for decision making for governmental, commercial and individual users. The BGS carries out research in strategically important areas including energy and natural resources, vulnerability to environmental change and hazards, and earth system science, often in collaboration with the national and international scientific academic community. In this way the BGS maintains and develops understanding of earth sciences to improve policy making, enhance national wealth and reduce risk.

    2.2 BGS undertakes surveying, modelling, research and environmental and geological monitoring to deliver UK and NERC science objectives. It also works overseas, where it plays an important role in building geological infrastructure and capacity in developing countries.

      2.3 Our annual budget is in the region of £53 million, a little over half of which comes from the UK government's Science Budget, with the remainder coming from external commissioned research.

    3.  COMMENTS ON THE NAO REPORT OF ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE

    3.1  Natural hazards

      3.1.1  The impact of climate change is one of the biggest and most complicated challenges facing society today. It is vital that research into climate change addresses the magnitude and frequency of impacts from natural hazards such as landslides. Currently there is very limited temporal data on these events (especially landslides) and this has to be addressed before a good indication of the magnitude and frequency of natural hazards can be undertaken.

    3.1.2  Climate change impacts are not just the change in temperature or precipitation, but the impacts of those events on the natural environment, eg the secondary effects. This is not clear in the NAO review and should not be forgotten. For example, in urban areas, the highest priorities are likely to be (for example):— increased surface water run-off (from higher intensity rainfall) and surface water flooding;

    — sea level rise and storm surges in coastal cities;

    — rising groundwater levels with respect to buried utilities; and

    — remobilisation of contaminants from changing groundwater levels and the resilience of engineered infrastructure to changes in environmental properties.

  3.1.3 As a result, adaptation policies need to take a very holistic view of the surface and sub-surface earth system to measure impacts properly. Adaptation strategies cannot be restricted to the surface alone as this will not give a true picture of sustainability. This again needs to be highlighted as there is too much emphasis on surface effects in the NAO review.

4.  GROUNDWATER SCIENCE

  4.1 The departmental reports within the review that relate to the work of Groundwater Science are DEFRA, DIUS and DECC. Their two-page summaries seem to capture the issues at the highest level and addition of detail would be inappropriate. Research into the environmental issues is covered at the highest level through the Living With Environmental Change (LWEC) programme but we are unable to comment if the programme is being implemented in the most expeditious or effective manner.

5.  DEPARTMENTAL APPROACHES TO MITIGATING MANAGING RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CLIMATE CHANGE

  5.1 The BGS is not in a position to comment on the individual departmental approaches set out in the NAO review to managing risks associated with climate change or the suitability of these procedures. However, a longer-term aim is—through the recently established BGS Government Advisory Panel—to engage more effectively with central government to inform and support policy development and implementation across a range of departments (eg DECC, MoD, BIS, DEFRA, DfT, DfID, FCO). This will include working with government to help mitigate the effects of climate change.

15 October 2009





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 25 March 2010