3 Where are the green jobs?
32) New employment opportunities will be created
as the UK becomes a low-carbon economy, particularly in the sectors
highlighted in the Low Carbon Industrial Strategy. Currently the
workforce does not have the capacity to deliver the energy saving
measures or changes to renewable energy supply or transport that
will be needed.[27] The
Government's understanding of where these jobs are needed is limited.
33) The UK environmental goods and services (EGS)
sector is growing. In 2004 the sector had a turnover of around
£25 billion, and accounted for around 400,000 jobs in some
17,000 companies. Government projections suggest that the UK EGS
market will grow to £34 billion in 2010 and £46 billion
by 2015 with employment growing by at least 100,000 over the same
period.[28]
34) Where this growth will occur is unclear.
Targets have been established for generating renewable energy.
These provide a basis for forecasting employment and growth in
this sector. The TUC believes that in order to meet our 2020 renewables
targets, we are likely to see a ten-fold increase in jobs in this
sector as a whole, from around 16,000 positions now to 133,000
to design, manufacture, install and operate these new technologies.
In the period to 2020, onshore and offshore wind farms together
are likely to generate over 80% of the 38.5GW of installed renewable
electricity capacity. The TUC say up to 36,000 direct new UK jobs
could be created in the wind energy sector. The Government's forecasts
are more optimistic. They state that renewable energy could provide
£100 billion worth of investment opportunities and up to
half a million jobs in the renewable energy sector by 2020. A
report published in March 2009, estimated that the wind power
manufacturing sector was worth £11.5 billion in 2007/08 and
employed almost 87,500 people. Dr Gordon Edge, director of economics
and markets at the British Wind Energy Association, believed the
value of the wind industry to be roughly a tenth of this estimate,
employing just 5,000.
We are somewhat surprised at the level of activity
ascribed to our sector in the UK[
] We are struggling to
work out how they could come up with such a large figure.[29]
35) The Minister for Further Education, Skills
and Apprenticeships said that having a more industrial activist
approach to low-carbon industry relies on having good intelligence
and evidence of what is on the horizon.[30]
The sectors that are expected to grow, and where jobs will be
created, must be clearly signalled in order to plan for the low-carbon
transition. Skills delivery bodies need this information to plan
their strategies and investors want confident predictions about
growth. The disparity between government estimates and those from
other bodies creates uncertainty about the potential of new low-carbon
industries and some distrust of the Government's policy. The Committee
on Climate Change's report to Parliament and the Low Carbon Transition
Plan provide a good starting point for setting out clear expectations
about where new jobs will be needed. To
inform its activist approach the Government should build on the
work of the Committee on Climate Change and the Low Carbon Industrial
Strategy to reassess the number of new jobs that will be created
in the move to a low-carbon economy and provide more robust data
on where these jobs will come from and why.
Job Displacement
36) The transition to a low-carbon economy will
inevitably affect existing jobs. The UK cannot base its future
economic growth on activities that are carbon intensive. Jobs
will have to move from carbon-dependent sectors to low-carbon
sectors as economic growth shifts. Industries which will be most
affected are the producers of carbon-dependent products or services,
like car manufactures or non-renewable energy producers. Industries
that produce products or services with high embedded emissions
(e.g. steel making) will need to reduce the carbon footprint of
their goods, while industries that produce carbon-dependent products
(e.g. petrol car manufacturers) will need to diversify and change
their products. In all sectors new jobs to help business adapt
to a changing climate will be required. Job losses are not inevitable
but the requirement for companies to be less carbon intensive
is. Failure to do this will incur ever increasing costs as the
carbon market and carbon reduction commitment take effect.
37) Certain parts of the UK are dependent on
carbon-intensive industries. These communities could suffer a
large net loss of jobs. The Government's strategy must take this
into account as jobs might not be created in the same geographical
location.
38) The German government recently published
a report on the wider impacts of renewable energy policies on
the German economy, which shows that the new jobs created in the
renewables sector outweighed the jobs lost elsewhere in the economy.[31]
In the US, research in California has estimated that almost 1.5
million jobs were created across the economy between 1972 and
2007 as a result of household energy efficiency measures.[32]
In contrast, a study funded by the European Commission found that
under some economic scenarios the net effect on jobs in the UK
energy sector could be negative.
39) The TUC called for greater monitoring of
this displacement of jobs.[33]
Links can be drawn between different sectors or regions so that
employment opportunities are made available to those areas that
suffer greatest job losses. There are also links between the skills
used in new and old industries that provide a route for redeployment
of the workforce. The BWEA have noted similarities between the
experience and skills required in the offshore oil and gas industry
and the offshore wind industry.[34]
This experience could be used to help develop new industries in
areas where job losses could be expected.
40) It is not clear to us that Government has
a coherent approach to how to deal with this economic displacement.
It is important that they reflect on how employment in new and
traditional sectors will be affected Regional Development Agencies
(RDAs) are in a position to provide some assessment of this regional
and sectoral displacement. The Low Carbon Industrial Strategy
makes reference to collaboration between RDAs and other partners
but does not detail how this will happen. Strategic cooperation
between RDAs is all the more important because by April 2010 the
nine Regional Learning and Skills Councils will be dissolved and
the work of developing regional skills strategies will be taken
on by the RDAs. RDAs currently lead on a wide range of initiatives
to secure environmental and social benefits together with economic
development for regional communities. Typical examples of innovative
approaches in low-carbon sectors include:
(1) Yorkshire Forward's carbon capture and storage
partnership. The partners include a consortium of 25 energy and
industrial companies, local agencies, the TUC and unions.
(2) The South West RDA's support for a Green
Workplaces partnership in the region.
(3) Three Greater South East RDAs have established
Low Carbon Economy as an established priority.
41) The Government has not yet carried out research
in the UK to assess the likely impact of decarbonisation on existing
industries and jobs. The
Government should undertake research in partnership with trades
unions, employers and Regional Development Agencies to gain a
broader understanding of the impact of any job displacement resulting
from the move to a low-carbon economy and to develop strategies
to mitigate these effects.
FAIR TRANSITION
42) Significant periods of economic restructuring
in the past have often happened in a chaotic fashion. Many individuals
and communities in the UK are still adapting to the shift away
from industrial production over the last 30 years. Trades Unions
have argued for a 'Just Transition' to a low-carbon economy that
fairly distributes the costs and benefits of policies across the
economy.[35]
43) There is currently a very active debate on
the prospects for green jobs in the United States of America.
Here an emphasis is placed on ensuring green jobs contribute to
the social and economic sustainability of low income groups and
deprived communities. This is visible in the work of the Apollo
Alliance ("a coalition of business, labour and environmental
groups championing green employment"), the Blue-Green Alliance
("a coalition of unions and environmental groups, led by
the United Steelworkers and Sierra Club"), and Green for
All ("a national organization dedicated to building an inclusive
green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty").
Green for All was founded by Van Jones, author of The Green
Collar Economy, and President Obama's "green jobs czar".
44) One of the aims of focussing green jobs on
low income groups is to build support for environmental policies
among ordinary working people. Van Jones has said:
The green economy is not just a place where affluent
people can spend money. It is fast becoming a place where ordinary
people can earn money. In fact, the only part of the U.S. economy
that is growingthe only part of the economy that can grow,
long-termis the green part. So the green wave's new products,
services, and technologies could mean something important to struggling
communities: the possibility of new green-collar jobs, a chance
to improve community health, and opportunities to build wealth
in a sustainable way. [
] Working people will have a powerful
incentive to support a green-growth agenda as long as green partisans
embrace broad opportunity and shared prosperity as key values.[36]
45) Kevin Brennan MP, Minister for Further Education,
Skills, Apprenticeships, said the Government is putting together
a Just Transition forum to address the provision of jobs during
economic transition.[37]
The Government
needs to do more to link its policies on tackling poverty and
unemployment with the green agenda. The forthcoming DWP White
Paper provides an opportunity for the Government to embed this
thinking within its employment policy.
Quick Wins
46) The Aldersgate Group, a coalition of businesses,
environmental groups and individuals, call for a street-by-street
home insulation programme for social housing that would "create
thousands of jobs, develop low-carbon skills and re-invigorate
the construction sector during the recession".[38]
47) The Committee on Climate Change stressed
the importance of improving energy efficiency in homes and recommends
that the Government begin a more comprehensive programme. They
provided estimates of the benefits:
Energy efficiency in homes could be improved by 35%
by 2020 with an ambitious program of improved insulation (e.g.
covering 10 million lofts, 7 million cavity walls and 2 million
solid walls), the installation of 12 million energy efficient
condensing boilers, and major improvements in electrical appliance
efficiency.[39]
48) The Federation of Master Builders drew on
research carried out by the Environmental Change Institute at
the University of Oxford to show that building firms, product
manufacturers and suppliers could stand to tap into a new market
worth between £3.5 billion and £6.5 billion per year
if the UK developed policies, skills programmes and financial
incentives to upgrade our existing housing stock to make it greener
and more energy efficient.
49) We have consistently called for greater investment
in a national retrofitting programme to make homes and buildings
more energy efficient. Such a programme could sustain employment
in local communities throughout the country, and could develop
the skills and supply chains required in what will be a long-term
growth sector.[40] The
UK will not achieve our carbon goals without significant action
in retrofitting housing, and ensuring sustained activity in this
area would cut emissions, reduce fuel poverty, and enhance the
UK's energy security. At the same time this is an opportunity
for the construction sector to tap into this market and bring
about up-skilling and new job opportunities. This is particularly
important for small businesses during an economic downturn. The
Kirklees Council's Warm Zone, an energy saving refurbishment partnership
with Eaga, has created 80 full-time jobs and saved approximately
£1 million a year on household energy bills. The overall
economic benefit to the area is calculated at over £50 million.[41]
50) The Government's Heat and Energy Saving Strategy
focuses on retrofitting existing housing stock, but while it is
a step in the right direction we fear it is unlikely to achieve
the full potential of combining carbon emissions reductions with
employment growth. There are 26 million homes in the UK and 85%
of those will still be in use in 2050 (when the Government has
set the target to cut emissions by 80%). The FMB estimated that
to achieve these targets 24,000 homes would need to be converted
per week until 2030. At the present there is not sufficient capacity
in the workforce to do this.[42]
51) We recommend that the Government
immediately and substantially increases the scale and speed of
its programmes to improve the energy efficiency of existing buildings,
and make this the UK's number one priority for green fiscal stimulus.
The Government must ensure that a workforce is developed to enable
the work on energy saving to be carried out and that it is equipped
with all the necessary skills.
27 Ev 71, Q292, Q317 Back
28
TUC, A Fair and Just Transition-Research report for Greening
the Workplace, July 2005 Back
29
ENDS Report 411, April 2009, pp 32-35 Back
30
Q345 Back
31
Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and
Nuclear Safety, Renewable Energy: Employment Effects, 2006
Back
32
Roland-Holst, Energy Efficiency, Innovation and Job Creation,
Centre for Energy, Rsources and Economic Sustainability, University
of California, 2008 Back
33
Q100 Back
34
Ev 69 Back
35
TUC, Touchstone Pamphlet 3, A Green and Fair Future: For a
Just Transition to a Low Carbon Economy, 2008 Back
36
Van Jones, The Green Collar Economy, New York: Harper Collins,
2008, pp 54-5 Back
37
Q393 Back
38
Ev 14 Back
39
Committee on Climate Change, Meeting carbon budgets: the need
for a step change: Progress report to Parliament, 12 October
2009. Back
40
Environmental Audit Committee, Third Report of Session 2008-09,
Pre-Budget Report 2008: Green fiscal policy in a recession,
HC 202, para 21 Back
41
Ev 38 Back
42
Q316 Back
|