Carbon budgets: Government Response to the Committee's Third Report - Environmental Audit Committee Contents


Appendix 2—Letter from Sir Michael Pitt, Chair of the Infrastructure Planning Commission


Carbon Budgets

There has been a great deal of interest in this important issue and I thought it might be helpful if I wrote to you setting out the IPC's position on it.

Consideration of climate change impacts is likely to form an important part of the IPC's examination of proposed Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs).

The draft National Policy Statements make clear (EN-1 paragraph 2.1.5) that the Government policies that underlie NPSs have been set in accordance with the UK Low Carbon Transition Plan and carbon budgets, and the IPC does not need to assess individual applications in terms of carbon emissions against the carbon budgets. Nevertheless, applicants must provide information in their environmental statements, in accordance with the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, about the likely significant effects of the project, including the direct effects and any indirect, secondary, cumulative, short, medium and long-term, permanent and temporary, positive and negative effects. Similar information must be provided even where an environmental statement is not required under the Directive.

The IPC cannot, in my judgment, have the function of assessing the cumulative impact of development proposals submitted to it on carbon budgets, in part because the infrastructure planning system itself is only one part of the wider picture, and in part because not all infrastructure proposals fall within the IPC's remit to consider.

I note the Committee's recommendation that the Government should put in place an alternative mechanism to ensure that the sum of the decisions taken by the IPC is consistent with the carbon budgets. This is a matter for Government. From the IPC's perspective, we would expect that parties to the examination of NSIP applications will wish to submit evidence relating to carbon emissions, and all that evidence will be considered and weighed in our decision making. The Committee on Climate Change may wish to provide evidence of this nature and we would have a duty to consider it.

Sir Michael Pitt

Chair of the Infrastructure Planning Commission


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 31 March 2010