Dairy Farmers of Britain - Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Contents


6  Conclusion

109.  Mr Mustoe, the Chairman of First Milk, told us that the difference between a plc and a co-operative was brought home to him in his first few months in the job when he met some of First Milk's farmer members. He commented: "they are not ordinary shareholders in the sense that they are expecting a dividend and if it goes down it's annoying but it's not material in terms of their existence." He stated: "The difference with a co-op is that you have the ability as a business to mess with people's lives and if you run your business poorly then those people will suffer".[217] DFB did not fail because it was a co-operative. However, dairy co-operatives in the UK are comparatively young and there is much to be learnt from older, larger co-operatives in Europe and elsewhere. Defra should produce a report within the next 12 months examining governance and capital-raising arrangements in these co-operatives, together with the legislative framework that applies, and exploring the lessons these countries offer for dairy co-operatives in the UK.

110.  No single factor—not even the purchase of ACC in and of itself—caused DFB's demise and its problems were not unique: the majority of them could affect any business. DFB experienced some bad luck. More significantly, it suffered from over-ambition, a shortage of capital and, at various points during its existence, poor governance and poor communication. In its final year, it lost the confidence of its members and its customers. Hindsight certainly makes it easier to begin to understand what happened at DFB, but, as we have made clear, some of the issues we have discussed in our report should have caused concern at the time. Ultimately, DFB's members were badly let down. We have suggested some steps which we believe may reduce the chances of other farmers suffering a similar fate. We summarise below the actions that should be taken by the Government.

111.  As the Department responsible for agriculture, Defra should be offering advice and assistance to support the growth of agricultural co-operatives. First, Defra must pursue the matter of the taxation of members' contributions to co-operatives with the Treasury. It is manifestly unfair that farmers should have to pay tax on money that is only notionally allocated to them and that is actually invested in their co-operative. Secondly, Defra must co-ordinate the key players to devise solutions for overcoming the constraints on the capitalisation of agricultural co-operatives. The Legislative Reform Order that is currently before Parliament should be regarded as the beginning of this process, rather than a solution by itself. Thirdly, Defra should work with the Financial Services Authority to ensure that issues affecting agricultural co-operatives in particular are taken into account when developing best practice guidance for industrial and provident societies.

112.  Clearly the immediate impact of the failure of DFB was a further questioning of confidence in the dairy industry. Defra must recognise this in its work to ensure that the dairy industry has a positive future that reflects the natural advantage of the grass-growing areas of the UK for producing milk.


217   Q 709 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 23 March 2010