Waste Strategy for England 2007 - Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Contents


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the British Metals Recycling Association (Waste 38a)

INTRODUCTION

  The issues that we cover below are crucial to the future success of the UK metal recycling industry. These all relate to, yet are not covered by, the Waste Strategy for England 2007. In fact, notwithstanding that the Strategy introduces a new focus on materials and products, there is no reference to a strategy for metals other than to seeking to increase the reclamation of aluminium from household waste.

However, with large volumes of metal still being sent to landfill, and EU recovery and recycling targets, and the level of regulation imposed on the metal recycling industry, both continuing to increase, more must be done by the Government to help maximise the contribution made by the metal recycling industry.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE ISSUES & CLASSIFICATION OF WASTE (PARA 6-7, 13-20, 34-38)

  A revised Waste Framework Directive was approved at second reading by the European Parliament on 17 June and is expected to be endorsed by the European Council on 20 October. This would allow a new Directive to become law before the end of 2008.

BMRA is pleased that the text agreed by the European Parliament specifies a waste hierarchy giving due priority to recycling, provides clear definitions of recycling and recovery, and recommends that comitology (with scrutiny) be used to determine the criteria for reclassifying waste as non-waste. The text further states that fully recovered metal should be among the first materials considered for reclassification once the criteria have been developed.

  The comitology process will be informed by detailed work undertaken over the past two years by one of the European Commission's research bodies, the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), into the possible criteria for determining non-waste status for recovered metal and other "wastes". The IPTS report, which has been widely consulted upon and which will be published imminently, should help achieve an early reclassification for recovered metal.

  We are grateful for the support received from Defra officials and UK MEPs in achieving this position. It is now incumbent on the Government to ensure that the remaining steps in achieving reclassification are taken as quickly and smoothly as possible, thereby allowing recovered metal to no longer be considered waste for the purposes of the recovery and recycling targets imposed under EU producer responsibility legislation, and releasing it from the shipment controls that are severely restricting the ability of the UK metal recycling industry to engage in legitimate international trade.

OFF-CUTS (PARA 39)

  BMRA is pleased that the Environment Agency has recently issued guidance that clean metal off-cuts, such as factory arisings that result from metal manufacturing processes, can be considered by-product and not waste. The implication is that they can be reused without regulatory control, in line with guidance issued by the Commission in February 2007.

However, the issue remains under discussion with the Scottish Environment Protection Agency—we believe it fundamental that the ruling be applied throughout the UK if Scottish metal recyclers are not to be placed at a commercial disadvantage.

PACKAGING (PARA 39)

  The Packaging Directive stipulates that packaging waste exported outside the EU can only count towards a member state's targets if there is sound evidence that recovery and recycling took place under environmental conditions broadly equivalent to those in the EU.

In response to the difficulties experienced by metal exporters in obtaining the necessary paperwork to prove broadly equivalent overseas processing, the Government approved amended regulations in July 2008 to ease the requirement on metal exporters to provide evidence and to grant the Environment Agency greater discretion in determining what constitutes sound evidence.

  The amended regulations will help ensure that the UK does not fail in meeting its targets for the recycling of metal packaging by being unable to show that the recovery and recycling of metal has taken place.

REGULATION: ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING PROGRAMME & SECTOR SPECIFIC GUIDANCE (PARA 3, 4, 22) AND THE REVIEW OF EXEMPTIONS (PARA 7, 23)

  A survey conducted by the BMRA among its members in May/June 2008 found that an average large metal recycler faces 15-18 different strands of environmental regulation, whilst an average small, family-owned company must comply with at least 12. The consequence is that each weighbridge transaction lasts an average of five minutes—two minutes for the commercial transaction and three minutes for paperwork—a process that the average metal recycling site must repeat 300-400 times daily.

The Environmental Permitting Programme (EPP) introduced in April 2008, rather than alleviating the regulatory burden, will impose further costs on the industry. For example, metal recycling site managers will become obliged to obtain certificates of technical competence whilst the current design of standard permits, with limited provision for the acceptance of hazardous wastes and low tonnage limits, means that many recyclers will be forced to apply for bespoke licenses.

  In addition, a consultation paper published in July 2008 on the review of exemptions proposes that the tonnage threshold to qualify for exemptions under "paragraph 45" be significantly reduced, meaning that around 100 BMRA members would no longer be able to benefit from a less onerous licensing system and be forced to apply for standard or bespoke licenses.

  BMRA believes that there exists no substantive environmental evidence, both within the EPP and the review of exemptions, to justify changing provisions that have worked well for many years. In fact, whilst there have been 42 government consultations over the past two years relating to changes in UK and EU regulations that have required review and response by the metal recycling industry, not a single one has concerned the level of regulation imposed on the industry.

  We would welcome such a review—streamlined paperwork and sector-specific guidance would reduce the regulatory burden on the industry and boost metal recycling in the UK.

British Metals Recycling Association (BMRA)

August 2008



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 19 January 2010