European Scrutiny Committee Contents


13 Draft Budget 2010

(a) (30860) —

(b) (31190) 16763/09 SEC(09) 1635

Draft General Budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2010

Amending letter No. 3 to the preliminary draft budget for 2010

Legal baseArticle 272 EC; QMV; the special role of the European Parliament in relation to the adoption of the Budget is set out in Article 272
Documents originated(b) 26 November 2009
Deposited in Parliament(b) 1 December 2009
DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 7 December 2009
Previous Committee Report(a) HC 19-xxvii (2008-09), chapter 34 (14 October 2009), HC 19-xxxi (2008-09), chapter 14 (11 November 2009) and HC 5-i (2009-10), chapter 18 (19 November 2009)

(b) None

Discussed in Council18 November 2009
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decision(a) Cleared (decision reported 14 October 2009)

(b) Cleared

Background

13.1 The Commission's Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) is the first stage in the Community's annual budgetary procedure. We reported on the 2010 PDB in June 2009[40] and it was debated in European Committee on 6 July 2009.[41] The second stage is the adoption by the Council of the Draft Budget (DB). The 2010 DB was adopted on 10 July 2009 and we reported on it in October 2009.[42] The 2010 PDB and the 2010 DB form the basis of the 2010 Adopted Budget which is expected to be agreed in mid-December 2009, after consideration by the European Parliament in October 2009, further consideration by the Council in November 2009 and negotiations between the Council and the European Parliament.

13.2 During the negotiations of its budget proposals in the PDB the Commission presents a number of Amending Letters, normally to update assumptions in the PDB numbers or to take account of new developments.

The Minister's letter

13.3 The Economic Secretary to the Treasury (Ian Pearson) writes now to tell us about the outcome of the Council's second consideration of its DB, following the European Parliament's first reading of it, and the accompanying conciliation process. The Minister encloses with his letter annexes, which we reproduce, helpfully setting out the euro and sterling figures for the five budget categories and the changes in these adopted by the Council from those adopted in the European Parliament's first reading.

THE COUNCIL'S SECOND READING AND CONCILIATION

13.4 The Minister says that on 18 November 2009 the Council formally agreed its second reading of the 2010 DB, following conciliation with the European Parliament and that the amended DB was agreed under the qualified majority voting procedure, with unanimous support from Member States. The Minister then continues with the detail of all this, first telling us that:

  • the Council's agreed position ahead of conciliation was based on a package put together by the Swedish Presidency, and supported by the Government, following discussions in Council's Budget Committee;
  • the Presidency package proposed total commitment appropriations of €140,555 million (£128,130 million);
  • this represented an increase of €2.60 billion (£2.40 billion) from the Council's first reading position, although was still €518 million (£472 million) lower than the level proposed by the Commission's PDB and the Amending Letters to it;
  • the increase is largely explained by the Presidency package incorporating €2.00 billion (£1.80 billion) of the €2.40 billion (£2.20 billion) required to finance the outstanding tranche of the European Economic Recovery Plan, which had not been included in the Council's first reading position;
  • the Presidency package proposed total payment appropriations of €121,488 million (£110,748 million), an increase of €967 million (£882 million) from the Council's first reading position and representing 1.04% of EU GNI;
  • the Presidency package incorporated the changes to the overall Financial Framework and individual heading ceilings in 2009 and 2010, as proposed by Commission, with an increase to the 2010 overall commitment appropriations ceiling of €1.30 billion (£1.20 billion), with a corresponding decrease to the 2009 ceiling;[43]
  • at heading level, this meant an increase to the 2010 ceiling for Sub-Heading 1a (Competitiveness for growth and employment) of €1.60 billion (£1.50 billion), entirely offset by decreases to Sub-Heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment) in 2010 and to Headings 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) and 5 (Administration) in 2009 and 2010; and
  • once this revision of the Financial Framework ceilings had been taken into account, the Presidency package left a margin of €1.00 billion (£0.90 billion).

13.5 The Minister summarises by saying that the Presidency package substantially reverted back to the Council's first reading position, with the following amendments and additions:

  • the package partially accepted Amending Letter No 1,[44] incorporating €95 million (£87 million) in commitment appropriations and €60 million (£55 million) in payment appropriations for support to Palestine;
  • the package accepted in full Amending Letter No 2,[45] providing €75 million (£68 million) in commitment appropriations for decommissioning of the Kozloduy nuclear plant in Bulgaria, €1,587 million (£1,447 million) and €377 million (£344 million) in commitment and payment appropriations respectively for energy projects under the European Economic Recovery Plan, and emergency support to the dairy sector, small adjustments to some budget lines under Heading 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) and €420 million (£383 million) in commitment appropriations for the rural development/CAP "health check" component of the European Economic Recovery Plan, resulting in a net increase under that heading of €739 million (£674 million) and €414 million (£377 million) in commitment and payment appropriations respectively;
  • it reverted to PDB levels on several budget lines under Heading 2, leading to an increase compared to the Council's first reading of €71 million (£65 million) in both commitment and payment appropriations, while maintaining the substantial reduction in the Council's first reading to the European Agriculture Guarantee Fund clearance of accounts budget line of €230 million (£210 million); and
  • it accepted some comparatively small amendments made by the European Parliament in its first reading, including increases for the European Parliament's administration budget, as well as in Sub-Heading 1a and Heading 4 (EU as a global player).

13.6 Turning to the agreement reached between the Council and the European Parliament the Minister reports that before proceeding with the second reading of the DB, the Council held its customary conciliation meeting with a delegation from the European Parliament. During this it was clear that no agreement would be found on the budget without first agreeing on the financing of the full €2.4 billion (£2.2 billion) remaining tranche for the European Economic Recovery Plan. This, and key elements of the budget were agreed as follows:

  • total payment appropriations were set at €122,937 million (£112,069 million), corresponding to approximately 1.04% of EU GNI, below the level proposed by the Commission in its PDB and Amending Letters, and €4.6 billion (£4.20 billion) below that proposed by the European Parliament in its first reading;
  • political agreement was reached on a revision of the Financial Framework in 2009 and 2010 in order to finance in full the outstanding €2.4 billion (£2.2 billion) tranche of the European Economic Recovery Plan — this was achieved without any overall increase to the Financial Framework for 2009 and 2010;
  • the Sub-Heading 1a ceiling in 2010 was increased by €1.8 billion (£1.6 billion), with corresponding decreases in Heading 2 of €1.3 billion (£1.2 billion) in 2009 and €158 million (£144 million) in 2010, in Heading 5 of €174 million (£159 million) in 2009 and €126 million (£115 million) in 2010, in Sub-Heading 1b of €1.00 million (£0.90 million) in 2009 and €6 million (£5 million) in 2010 and in Sub-Heading 3a (Freedom, security and justice) of €5 million (£5 million) in 2009;
  • mobilisation of €195 million (£178 million) from the Flexibility Instrument in 2010, meaning €315 million (£287 million) would be available under the Instrument for the 2011 budget negotiation;[46]
  • €120 million (£109 million) of the amount mobilised was allocated towards financing energy projects under the European Economic Recovery Plan, €75 million (£68 million) was allocated towards financing the decommissioning of the Kozloduy nuclear plant (an expenditure demand contained in Amending Letter No 2 that the European Parliament did not wish to see financed from the Sub-Heading 1a margin before the European Economic Recovery Plan energy component was fully financed);
  • acceptance of Amending Letter No 2, amended to include €1.98 billion (£1.80 billion) in commitment appropriations for the energy component of the European Economic Recovery Plan, resulting from the revision of the Financial Framework, the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument and redeployment of €81 million (£74 million) of commitment appropriations from within Sub-Heading 1a in 2010; and
  • the amount of the Common Foreign and Security Policy budget for 2010 was set at €282 million (£275 million) in commitment appropriations, subject to the European Parliament's final vote on discharge in relation to the Council's accounts in 2007, which subsequently took place, on 25 November 2009.

13.7 The Minister tells us that four joint statements, with the European Parliament and the Commission, were agreed by the Council. These concern continuity of the 2010 budgetary procedure in view of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009, the building policy of EU institutions and bodies, simplification and a more targeted use of structural and cohesion funds in the context of the economic crisis and the use of the margin in Heading 5 in 2010.[47] In addition the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission also agreed that, before 1 December 2009, they would agree a joint declaration on transitional measures applicable to the budgetary procedure after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty — the Minister adds that this declaration has now been agreed by written procedure and is expected to be formally approved by both institutions shortly.

13.8 The Minister tells us also that the Council agreed to adopt Preliminary Draft Amending Budget No 10 to the 2009 budget,[48] as updated by the Commission on 11 November 2009 in the light of the latest information on revenue and expenditure, providing:

  • an overall decrease to revenue from VAT- and GNI-based contributions of €1,386 million (£1,321 million);
  • an overall increase to Traditional Own Resources revenue of €600 million (£572 million);
  • an overall reduction in payment appropriations of €3,204 million (£3,052 million), which now includes a reduction of €135 million (£129 million) in both commitment and payment appropriations for the European Agriculture Guarantee Fund in Heading 2; and
  • a reduction of payment appropriations under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development of €1.70 billion (£1.60 billion).

In addition, the Preliminary Draft Amending Budget was further modified by the Council to include a decrease in both commitment and payment appropriations under Heading 5 of €42.50 million (£40.5 million), a €40.00 million (£38.10 million) underspend from the Council's budget and €2.50 million (£2.40 million) from the budgets of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The effect of these changes result in a total reduction in Member States' GNI-based contributions of €3,488 million (£3,322 million), of which the UK share is €442 million (£421 million).

THE AMENDING LETTER

13.9 Amending Letter No. 3, document (b), is to cover additional resources for changes to the functioning of the European Council and the Council in 2010, following entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. On this the Minister, reminding us that he had already alerted us to the proposal,[49] says that:

  • largely as a result of the Government's lobbying, this proposal was not adopted but merely "noted" at the Council of 18 November 2009 and it was instead to be adopted under a written procedure by 30 November 2009;
  • at the Council the Government stressed the importance of Member States and national parliaments being given adequate time to consider all budgetary proposals related to the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty;
  • for the purpose of the written procedure the Amending Letter was formally issued by the Commission on 26 November 2009;
  • the text and substance of the proposal was unchanged from the elements to which we had been alerted, with the exception of a reduction of €1.50 million (£1.40 million) in the contingency reserve, for which the Government and other Member States had argued strongly; and
  • due to the underspend in the Council's administration budget in 2009 (outlined in the previous paragraph) it will be possible to finance the full amount of €23.50 million (£21.00 million) requested in the Amending Letter while still reducing the overall level of administration expenditure in 2009 and 2010.

The Government's view and the next stage

13.10 The Minister says that, in line with the approach and objectives that the Government had told us of as the 2010 Budget was negotiated, it believes the it achieved the best possible outcome from this stage of the negotiations. He comments that:

  • through tough negotiation and close engagement with other Member States, the Government secured a 2010 Budget with payment appropriations below the level of the Commission's proposals in the PDB and Amending Letters;
  • at the same time, the budget contains the full financing for the remaining tranche of the European Economic Recovery Plan, which was achieved without any overall increase to the Financial Framework for 2007-2013;
  • this was done through redirecting resources towards competitiveness and growth and away from areas that represent poorer value for money, such as administration and agricultural spending;
  • the consensus reached at the Council meeting of 18 November 2009 set overall payment appropriations for the 2010 Budget;
  • the Council has now concluded its second reading of the budget and compulsory expenditure, mainly on agriculture,[50] has been settled; and
  • the European Parliament will formally agree the non-compulsory expenditure part of the 2010 Budget in its second reading, culminating in the plenary session on 14-17 December 2009 — this will mark the formal adoption of the 2010 Budget.

Conclusion

13.11 We are grateful to the Minister for his report on the outcome of the negotiations on the 2010 Budget, including the resolution of the issue of Amending Letter No 3, document (b), which we clear.





40   (30692): see HC 19-xx (2008-09) chapter 2 (17 June 2009). Back

41   Gen Co Deb, European Committee, 6 July 2009, cols. 3-38. Back

42   See headnote. Back

43   (31063) 15208/09 (31068) 15173/09: see HC 19-xxxi (2008-09), chapter 15 (11 November 2009). Back

44   (30888) 12793/09 + ADD 1: see HC 19-xxxi (2008-09), chapter 14 (11 November 2009). Back

45   (31100) 15172/09: see HC 19-xxxi (2008-09), chapter 14 (11 November 2009). Back

46   The Flexibility Instrument permits up to €200 million (£182 million) to be budgeted each year above the ceilings of the Financial Framework, which funds can be carried over for up to two years. Back

47   See http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ecofin/111307.pdf pages 13-17. Back

48   See footnote 43. Back

49   (30860): see HC 5-i (2009-10), chapter 18 (19 November 2009). Back

50   EU expenditure is regarded as either "compulsory" or "non-compulsory". Compulsory expenditure is expenditure necessarily resulting from the Treaty or from acts adopted in accordance with the Treaty. The Council has the final say in fixing its total. The European Parliament has the final say in determining the amount and pattern of non-compulsory expenditure. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 22 December 2009