Documents considered by the Committee on 6 January 2010 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


4 Value added taxation

(30885)

12886/09

COM(09) 427

Draft Council Regulation on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (Recast)

Legal baseArticle 93 EC; consultation; unanimity
DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of consideration Minister's letter of 14 December 2009
Previous Committee Report HC 19-xxvii (2008-09), chapter 9 (14 October 2009)
To be discussed in Council Not known
Committee's assessment Politically important
Committee's decision Not cleared; further information awaited

Background

4.1 The main instrument governing the exchange of information and assistance in VAT matters is the Administrative Cooperation Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003). This has been amended on a number of occasions, most recently in late 2008. The Regulation is therefore in need of consolidation.

4.2 This draft Regulation is to recast (consolidate and amend) the existing Administrative Cooperation Regulation. The proposal sets out the Commission's aim of providing Member States with the means for efficient and well organised administrative cooperation procedures on VAT issues to combat cross-border VAT fraud more effectively and for better collection of VAT in cases where the place of taxation is different from the place of establishment of the supplier.

4.3 The draft Regulation would recast the present Regulation to take into account changes that have already been agreed in other instruments, align, reorder and harmonise existing legal text, introduce new measures and extend the role of the existing comitology[6] committee (the Standing Committee on Administrative Cooperation) to some of the new elements. The key measures include:

  • common minimum standards for Member States when registering and deregistering traders for VAT;
  • giving authorised personnel in other Member States automatic access to certain data on VAT registered businesses held by a Member State;
  • allowing authorised tax authority personnel access to another Member State's summary intra-Community trading information and certain other data;
  • Eurofisc — the main function of which will be to provide a fast-track network for exchanging specified data between Member States and to provide an early warning system of possible fraud; and
  • an enhanced VAT number verification system to help businesses verify their Community customer's details.

Other changes include:

  • establishing the principle that Member States are collectively responsible for helping each other to secure their VAT revenues;
  • a requirement that tax authorities provide each other with feedback on the value of the information which they exchange;
  • clarification of existing legislation to facilitate greater use of cooperation tools and to remove inconsistencies of interpretation.

4.4 When we considered the proposal, in October 2009, we heard that fighting VAT fraud remained a priority for the Government and that it therefore welcomed the Commission's proposal, supported many of the measures in it but had some reservations, which it would need to address during negotiations. We commented that cooperation between Member States to counter VAT fraud was clearly important, and rationalising and improving legislation facilitating that cooperation would be welcome. However, we noted the Government's reservations about the detail of the draft Regulation. So before considering that document further we asked to hear about developments on these points in the negotiations and to see, if the need for one emerged, any Impact Assessment.[7]

The Minister's letter

4.5 The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Mr Stephen Timms) writes now to tell us that:

  • only two working group meetings on this matter have been held under the Swedish Presidency and so there has been only limited discussion of the proposal;
  • so the Government has had little opportunity to explore the proposal with other Member States and test its interpretations of the original text;
  • nevertheless it is aware from those discussions that there is a wide spectrum of views on the proposal;
  • more specifically other Member States share its concerns with regard to common minimum standards and about the role played by comitology more widely; and
  • the Government anticipates that the Spanish Presidency will see this matter as a priority and that more substantive discussions will take place early in 2010.

Conclusion

4.6 We are grateful to the Minister for keeping us informed in relation to this draft Regulation. We look forward to hearing in due course about more substantive discussion. Meanwhile the document remains under scrutiny.


6   Comitology is the system of committees which oversees the exercise by the Commission of powers delegated to it by the Council and the European Parliament. Comitology committees are made up of representatives of the Member States and chaired by the Commission. There are three types of procedure (advisory, management and regulatory), an important difference between which is the degree of involvement and power of Member States' representatives. So-called "Regulatory with Scrutiny", introduced in July 2006, gives a scrutiny role to the European Parliament in most applications of comitology. Back

7   See headnote. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 15 January 2010