Documents considered by the Committee on 17 March 2010 - European Scrutiny Committee Contents


1 EU policies until 2020


(a)

(31328)

6018/10

SEC(10) 116

(b)

(31329)

6037/10

SEC(10) 114

(c)

(31373)

7110/10

COM(10) 2020


Commission staff working document: Europe 2020: consultation — first overview of responses


Commission staff working document: Lisbon Strategy evaluation document


Commission Communication: Europe 2020 — A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth

Legal base
Documents originated(a) and (b) 2 February 2010

(c) 3 March 2010

Deposited in Parliament(a) and (b) 18 February 2010

(c) 5 March 2010

DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of consideration(a) and (b) Two EMs of 1 March 2010

(c) EM of 15 March 2010

Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilECOFIN Council on 16 March 2010, European Council on 25-26 March 2010
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionFor debate in European Committee

Background

1.1 In 2000 an action plan, known as the Lisbon Agenda or Lisbon Strategy, was launched to "make Europe, by 2010, the most competitive and the most dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world". In 2005 the action plan was relaunched for the remainder of the decade as the Lisbon Strategy for Jobs and Growth.

1.2 In November 2009 the Commission published a Working Document seeking the views of citizens, organisations and public authorities on a future "Europe 2020" strategy as a successor to the current Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. It set out broad proposals for policies over the next ten years intended to enable the EU to make a full recovery from the economic crisis, while speeding up the move towards "a smarter, greener economy". It described the need for structural reform in the Union, proposes some policy priorities and highlights possible delivery mechanisms.

1.3 The document was sent to the relevant sectoral Councils on 7 December 2009 and discussed at the European Council on 10-11 December 2009. The European Council's Conclusions recorded that it "takes note of the consultation launched by the Commission on the future strategy and looks forward to discussing an ambitious proposal as early as possible in 2010 with a view to full discussion in the European Council, including at its 2010 Spring meeting".[1] The public consultation closed on 15 January 2010 and the Commission intended to present a formal proposal for a strategy with a view to its adoption of the strategy at the Spring European Council.

1.4 When we first considered this document we said:

·  whatever plan is adopted to follow on from the Lisbon Strategy for Jobs and Growth would be an important determinant for a range of EU policies in the years up to 2020;

·  thus, while we were content to clear the document, we were clear that we would wish to recommend the Commission's formal proposal, once published and deposited, for debate before the Spring 2010 European Council; and

·  meanwhile, we wished to see any comments the Government decided to make in response to the document.

Subsequently the Government did send us such a response, as we reported on 20 January 2010.[2]

The documents

1.5 The first Commission staff working document, document (a), gives an initial indication as to the main trends that emerged from the responses, well over 1,500, to the Commission's consultation. All Member States provided an input and the Commission describes "broad support" for the policy priorities for Europe 2020 it outlined:

·  creating value by basing growth on knowledge;

·  empowering people in inclusive societies; and

·  creating a competitive, connected and greener economy.

On governance of Europe 2020 the Commission says that:

·  Member States agreed that the lessons of the Lisbon Strategy need to be learnt;

·  this includes raising the profile of reforms under the strategy, where there is "strong support for conferring lead responsibility to the European Council", and greater national accountability for progress, where "the majority of Member States agree with the idea of a limited number of EU targets translated into national ones";

·  several Member States called for "stronger economic policy coordination and more binding governance arrangements"; and

·  Member States recognised the "strong inter-linkages" between fiscal policy and structural reform and the need for "coherent policy advice", although some Member States "want to preserve the role of different economic coordination instruments in the Treaty, so to avoid any possible impression that the Stability and Growth Pact is being weakened".

1.6 The Commission also received contributions from about 120 regional and local authorities, from some two thirds of Member States, EU institutions and bodies, including the Committee of the Regions and the Economic and Social Committee, three EU political parties, numerous EU and national organisations representing interests including the social partners, consumers, business, environmentalists, educationalists, researchers and academics, almost 500 individual citizens, the Norwegian and Japanese Governments, the IMF, the UN, EFTA, the American Chamber of Commerce and the Japanese Business Council.

1.7 The second Commission staff working document, document (b), is an evaluation of the Lisbon Strategy. The Commission notes:

·  the context in which the Lisbon Strategy was formulated in 2000, when "the EU needed to increase its productivity and competitiveness in the face of ever fiercer global competition, technological change and an ageing population";

·  that it "recognised that the reform agenda could not be pursued at the EU level alone, but that…close cooperation between the EU and Member States would be necessary to achieve results"; and

·  that it "reflected a first acknowledgement that Member States' economies are inherently interlinked".

1.8 The Commission says that two factors have to be taken into account in assessing the Lisbon Strategy:

·  the most important assessment is the impact the Strategy had on growth and jobs, but "this is not straightforward, as the economic cycle and external events, as well as public policies, play a determining role"; and

·  "the Lisbon Strategy was not implemented in isolation" — the EU has grown from 15 Member States in 2000 to 27 Member States today, the euro area now stands at 16 members and has developed into a major world currency and the Strategy is "coming to the end of its term at a time when the impacts of the economic crisis are deeply felt in Europe".

1.9 The Commission then outlines a number of main conclusions, including:

·  the Lisbon Strategy has helped build broad consensus on the reforms that the EU needs — the four priority areas, research and innovation, investing in people and modernising labour markets, unlocking business potential and energy and climate change, are now at the top of the political agenda "in all Member States";

·  the Strategy has "delivered concrete benefits for EU citizens and businesses" — for example increased employment created 18 million new jobs before the crisis hit and the Commission has proposed administrative burden reductions "worth more than €40.00 billion" (£34.50 billion);

·  increased employment, however, " has not always succeeded in lifting people out of poverty" — some groups "still face specific hurdles such as poor access to training for the low-skilled", while child poverty remains "at a high level in some Member States";

·  structural reforms have made the EU economy "more resilient and helped us weather the storm" — for instance, medium- to long-term structural reforms "no doubt facilitated the design and rapid roll-out of the European Economic Recovery Plan at the end of 2008";

·  the Strategy, however, "was not sufficiently equipped to address some of the causes of the crisis from the outset" — with hindsight more focus could have been on "robust supervision and systemic risk in financial markets, speculative bubbles" and those factors that fuelled the "macroeconomic imbalances and competitiveness problems that were at the root of the economic crisis";

·  the pace of implementing reforms was "slow and uneven" and the strategy suffered from "variable ownership and weak governance structures" — for example, EU level targets were "too numerous" and did not "reflect differences in starting positions between the Member States";

·  a stronger link between the Strategy and "other EU instruments and sector-specific initiatives or policy measures (such as the Stability and Growth Pact, the Sustainable Development Strategy or the Social Agenda) would have improved its effectiveness" — while earmarking of structural funds has "helped mobilise considerable investments for growth and jobs", although there is further to go; and

·  more could have been done to strengthen both the euro area dimension (the importance of interdependence in a closely integrated economy, particularly the euro area, "has not been sufficiently recognised") and the external dimension of the Strategy.

1.10 In the Communication, document (c), the Commission presents its formal proposals for the Europe 2020 strategy. The Commission sets out the challenges facing the EU over the coming decade and the need for "a strategy to turn the EU into a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy delivering high levels of employment, productivity and social cohesion" and proposes:

·  policy priorities that focus on smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;

·  seven flagship initiatives to deliver on these policy priorities;

·  mobilising EU instruments and policies such as the single market to pursue the strategy's objectives; and

·  a governance structure that includes five headline targets that the EU should aim to achieve by 2020.

1.11 The challenges facing the EU over the next decade are said by the Commission to include:

·  recovering from the crisis;

·  securing and maintaining efficient and sustainable financial systems and public finances;

·  globalisation;

·  pressure on resources; and

·  ageing.

And it proposes three mutually reinforcing policy priorities which should frame the Europe 2020 strategy:

·  smart growth — developing an economy based on knowledge and innovation;

·  sustainable growth — promoting a more resource efficient, greener and more competitive economy; and

·  inclusive growth — fostering a high-employment economy, delivering social and territorial cohesion.

1.12 The five headline targets to be achieved by 2020 suggested by the Commission, to "guide our efforts and steer progress", are that:

·  the employment rate of the population aged 20-64 should increase from the current 69% to at least 75%;

·  3% of the EU's GDP should be invested in research and development;

·  the "20/20/20" climate and energy targets should be met (including an increase to 30% of emissions reductions, if the conditions are right);

·  the proportion of early school leavers should fall to 10% from the current 15%, while increasing the share of the population aged 30-34 having completed tertiary education from 31% to at least 40%; and

·  the number of citizens living below national poverty lines should be reduced by 25% (that is, 20 million fewer people should be at risk of poverty).

1.13 To "ensure that each Member State tailors the Europe 2020 strategy to its particular situation, the Commission proposes that these EU targets are translated into national targets and trajectories". These national targets would "reflect the current situation of each Member State and the level of ambition it is able to reach as part of a wider EU effort to meet these targets." The Commission then sets out its proposed flagship initiatives to complement national efforts.

1.14 First is "Innovation Union", which would seek to orient research and development and innovation policy towards the solution of grand challenges facing the Union. In doing so the Commission describes actions to be undertaken at EU level:

·  completion of the European Research Area;

·  improvement of framework conditions for business innovation;

·  launching "European Innovation Partnerships";

·  strengthening EU instruments that support innovation; and

·  promotion of efforts to co-ordinate the knowledge triangle of research, education and innovation.

And it suggests at Member State level:

·  reforming research and development and innovation systems to promote excellence;

·  ensuring a sufficient supply of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduates; and

·  prioritising knowledge expenditure.

1.15 Second is "Youth on the move", which would aim to enhance the performance and international attractiveness of the EU's higher education institutions and raise overall quality of all levels of education and training in the EU, combining both excellence and equity, by promoting student mobility and trainee mobility, and improving the employment situation of young people.

1.16 Third is "A digital agenda for Europe" which would aim to deliver sustainable economic and social benefits from a digital single market based on "fast and ultra fast internet", with broadband access for all by 2013, access for all to much higher internet speeds (30 megabits per second or above) by 2020, and 50% or more of EU households subscribing to internet connections above 100 megabits per second. To enable this the Commission sets out a number of initiatives, including:

·  providing a legal framework to facilitate high speed internet infrastructure and related services;

·  using structural funds (with respect to broadband roll-out) to create a true single market for online content and services;

·  developing (another) spectrum policy;

·  increasing EU research and innovation funding for information, communications and technology innovation and technology; and

·  promoting internet access for all EU citizens.

It also asks Member States to produce high-speed internet strategies, to establish legal frameworks to help facilitate network rollout and to promote accessible online private and public services.

1.17 Fourth is "Resource efficient Europe", which would aim to support the shift towards a low-carbon economy that is efficient in the way it uses all resources. The objective would be to decouple economic growth from resource and energy use, reduce carbon dioxide emissions, enhance competitiveness and promote greater energy security.

1.18 Fifth is "An industrial policy for the globalisation era", which would aim to improve the business environment, especially for small and medium sized enterprises, in order to develop a globally competitive and diversified industrial base. The Commission suggests:

·  supporting the transition of manufacturing and service sectors to a low carbon economy, including a review of regulations and standards to encourage greater resource efficiency and promotion of key enabling technologies;

·  a horizontal approach at EU level, combining policy instruments such as "smart" regulation, public procurement, competition rules and standard setting;

·  promotion of restructuring of sectors in difficulty towards future-oriented activities, energy efficient technologies and production methods;

·  renewing the Corporate Social Responsibility policy; and

·  assisting the transport, logistics, space policy and tourism sectors.

The Commission also calls on Member States to encourage innovative small and medium sized enterprises (including through public procurement), to improve enforcement of intellectual property rights and to reduce administrative burdens.

1.19 Sixth is "An agenda for new skills and jobs", which would be EU action focusing on those in employment through the flexicurity agenda, 'smart' regulation, social dialogue and mobility and migration. The Commission proposes:

·  using, for those out of or entering work, agreed education and training coordination;

·  correlating Member State action on these; and

·  carrying forward work under the Lisbon Strategy on tax-benefit reform, active ageing, work-life balance and gender equality.

1.20 The last flagship initiative is "European platform against poverty", which would use the current open method on social inclusion and protection, building on the awareness-raising from the current European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion to improve visibility and clarity. The Commission also proposes a basis for progressing on the draft equal treatment Directive and adding EU support for 'social innovations' to help the most disadvantaged.

1.21 Under the rubric "missing links and bottlenecks" the Commission then argues that "all EU policies, instruments and legal acts, as well as financial instruments", should be mobilised to pursue the Strategy's objectives. It discusses the possibilities under three headings. First, in relation to "A single market for the 21st century", the Commission says that:

·  a stronger, deeper, extended single market is vital for growth and job creation;

·  in response to the economic crisis there is a need to re-launch the single market — it still has barriers to cross-border activity and needs to adapt to the growth of information and communication technologies and services;

·  creation of an open single market for services through full implementation of the Services Directive could increase GDP by between 0.5% and 1.5%;

·  it aims to improve access for small and medium sized enterprises to the single market and through implementation of competition policy ensure that the single market remains an open market;

·  it proposes action to reinforce single market measures, drive forward the smart regulation agenda to reduce administrative burdens particularly for small and medium sized enterprises and to support entrepreneurship; and

·  it aims to adapt legislation to the digital era and make it easier for businesses and consumers to agree and enforce contracts with partners in other Member States.

1.22 In relation to "Investing in growth: cohesion policy, mobilising the EU budget and private finance", the Commission notes that it will propose action to develop innovative financing solutions to support the objectives of Europe 2020, including:

·  fully exploiting possibilities to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing EU budget through stronger reprioritisation and better alignment of EU expenditure with the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy;

·  greater use of the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund; and

·  making an efficient EU venture capital market a reality.

1.23 In relation to "Deploying our external policy instruments", the Commission says that:

·  external economic policy needs to be deployed to foster EU growth through participation in open and fair markets worldwide;

·  an open EU, within a rules based international framework, is the best route to exploit the benefits of globalisation and to boost growth and employment. The Commission is committed to working with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and bilaterally to secure better market access for EU business, including small and medium sized enterprises;

·  it will draw up a trade strategy for Europe 2020, including ongoing multilateral and bilateral trade negotiations, trade opening initiatives in key sectors such as "green" technologies and other high tech products and services, proposals for high level strategic dialogue with key partners and, from 2011, an annual trade and investment barriers report to identify ways to improve market access; and

·  the EU is committed to its international development responsibilities, aiming to eradicate poverty, promote growth and fulfil the Millennium Development Goals.

1.24 The Commission emphasises that pursuit of the Europe 2020 objectives must be based on a credible exit strategy as regards budgetary and monetary policy on the one hand and the direct support given by governments to economic sectors, in particular the financial sector, on the other and that the sequencing and coordination of these several exits, including within the euro area, are important.

1.25 The Commission then outlines a governance structure for Europe 2020, with its suggestions including that:

·  the strategy should be based around a thematic approach, focussed on the headline targets and flagship initiatives, and country reporting, to help "Member States define and implement exit strategies, to restore macroeconomic stability, identify bottlenecks, and return their economies to sustainable growth and public finances";

·  Europe 2020 and Stability and Growth Pact reporting and evaluation should be done simultaneously, while keeping the instruments and procedures separate and maintaining the integrity of the pact;

·  the Europe 2020 strategy be established institutionally in a small set of integrated guidelines (integrating employment and broad economic policy guidelines), to replace the existing 24 guidelines;

·  these new guidelines should reflect the decisions of the European Council and integrate agreed targets;

·  policy recommendations under the country surveillance mechanism would address issues with significant macroeconomic and public finance implications and those under the thematic approach would provide detailed advice on microeconomic and employment challenges; and

·  there should be a leading and central role for the European Council to steer the strategy, "as it is the body which ensures the integration of policies and manages the interdependence between Member States and the EU."

1.26 Finally the Commission sets out decisions for the European Council, saying:

    "The Commission proposes that the European Council, at its meeting in Spring 2010:

    —  agrees on the thematic priorities of the Europe 2020 strategy;

    —  sets the five headline targets …: on R&D investments, education, energy/climate change, employment rate, and reducing poverty, defining where Europe should be by 2020; invites the Member States in a dialogue with the European Commission to translate these EU targets into national targets for decisions at the June European Council, taking into account national circumstances and differing starting points;

    —  invites the Commission to come forward with proposals for the flagship initiatives, and requests the Council (and its formations) on this basis to take the necessary decisions to implement them;

    —  agrees to strengthen economic policy co-ordination to promote positive spill-over effects and help address the Union's challenges more effectively; to this end, it approves the combination of thematic and country assessments as proposed in this communication whilst strictly maintaining the integrity of the Pact; it will also give special attention to strengthening EMU;

    —  calls on all parties and stakeholders (e.g. national/regional parliaments, regional and/or local authorities, social partners and civil society, and last but not least the citizens of Europe) to help implement the strategy, working in partnership, by taking action in areas within their responsibility;

    —  requests the Commission to monitor progress and report annually to the Spring European Council, providing an overview of progress towards the targets, including international benchmarking, and the state of implementation of the flagship initiatives.

    "At its subsequent meetings:

    —   endorses the proposed integrated guidelines which constitutes its institutional underpinning following the opinion of the European Parliament;

    —   validates the national targets following a process of mutual verification to ensure consistency;

    —   discusses specific themes assessing where Europe stands and how progress can be accelerated. A first discussion on research and innovation could take place at its October meeting on the basis of a Commission contribution."

The Government's view

1.27 In relation to the Commission's paper on the responses to its consultation, document (a), the Economic Secretary to the Treasury (Ian Pearson) first reminds us that the Government responded with an outline of its emerging views on the Europe 2020 strategy and that those views, which would help to ensure focus on the key policy priorities and improve political engagement and coherence between the macroeconomic, microeconomic and financial pillars of EU economic policy, are set out in greater detail in its paper on an EU Compact for Jobs and Growth.[3] The Minister comments that the document provides a valuable overview of responses to the consultation and the themes that emerged and that the Government welcomes the fact that there is an emerging consensus among Member States and other stakeholders on the policy priorities for Europe 2020.

1.28 The Minister continues, on the governance of the new strategy, that the Government:

·  agrees that, while the Lisbon Strategy set the right direction for economic reforms, the successor strategy needs to raise the public profile of these reforms and increase the accountability for progress; and

·  has proposed establishing an annual economic summit of EU leaders to draw together analysis of progress based on reporting from the macroeconomic (the Stability and Growth Pact), microeconomic (peer review of structural reform) and financial sector (European Systemic Risk Board) processes and to set future direction for EU policy making.

1.29 On the second document, on lessons from the Lisbon Strategy, document (b), the Minister says that the Government welcomes the Commission's timely (in relation to discussion of the successor strategy) assessment of the Lisbon Strategy. He comments that:

·  the Government agrees that the Lisbon Strategy has played an important part in promoting economic reform across the EU by providing political impetus for EU and national policies, a toolkit for reform based on learning from the best performers in the EU and coordination in areas where action or inaction in one Member State would impact on citizens in another — as such, it was a factor in rising employment rates and productivity across the EU;

·  the EU and its Member States did not, however, make enough progress quickly enough and the progress that they did make has been set back by the economic crisis; and

·  the Government agrees that Europe 2020 will need to raise the public profile of the necessary economic reforms and increase the accountability for progress.

The Minister concludes by referring again to the Government's proposed "EU Compact for Jobs and Growth" and its proposal for an annual economic summit of EU leaders.

1.30 On document (c) the Minister first says that the proposals' conformity with the principle of subsidiarity will depend on the details as they emerge but notes that the Commission does say "The European Council should provide overall guidance for the strategy, on the basis of Commission proposals built on one core principle: a clear EU value added."

1.31 Turning to the policy implications the Minister says that:

·  the Government welcomes the Commission's Communication, which correctly highlights the huge challenges that the EU faces over the next ten years;

·  it welcomes the Commission's proposed priorities for Europe 2020 — smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; and

·  these priorities are interdependent and mutually reinforcing.

1.32 On the headline targets and benchmarking proposed by the Commission the Minister comments that:

·  the Government supports the idea of a small number of headline objectives that set the priorities for the Europe 2020 strategy, with agreed indicators used to measure progress towards them;

·  it remains to be convinced, however, that the indicators proposed by the Commission represent a coherent assessment of economic growth;

·  this might be better achieved by a more comprehensive set of indicators that would be relevant to all Member States, such as employment rate, labour productivity, and capital services growth as a measure of effective investment;

·  of the indicators proposed by the Commission, the Government would question, for example, whether targets in "percentage of GDP invested in R&D" and "number of those living below the median disposable income" would really help Member States, many of whom have different economic and social structures, to address innovation and social inclusion;

·  the Government believes that it is important to get the levels right — national targets in these indicators should not be based on EU-level figures;

·  they should be established by governments on the basis of national consultation — it would then be reasonable to hold governments publicly to account for progress towards those targets;

·  this "bottom-up" approach would help raise ownership and accountability, as well as being more credible than "top-down" targets imposed on Member States, so addressing two key lessons from the Lisbon Strategy; and

·  ambition could be encouraged by peer review and domestic debate on the appropriate level for the targets.

1.33 In introducing the Government's views on the Commission's proposed flagship initiatives the Minister says that:

·  the policy proposals in the Communication are broadly in line with those made by the Government in its EU Compact for Jobs and Growth paper and the Government looks forward to engaging with EU partners on the detail;

·  the Government will seek the right balance of competence between community and nation state in delivering economic policy; and

·  on the flagship initiatives that define the policy focus of Europe 2020, the Government's view is that significantly more work needs to be done on the initiatives and delivery mechanisms and on the links between them.

1.34 On the specific initiatives the Minister says first, in relation to "Innovation Union", that the Government:

·  supports EU initiatives which address the Union's relative weakness in its capacity to convert outputs from research into high value, innovative products and services;

·  welcomes the broad aims of this flagship initiative, especially the focus on tackling grand challenges such as climate change and ageing population and on strengthening all links in the innovation chain; and

·  welcomes the emphasis on a supportive regulatory framework and on the need to enhance access to finance to support growth in the key industries of the future.

1.35 On the initiative "Youth on the move" the Minister says that:

·  the proposal appears to largely carry forward work under recently agreed cooperation on youth and on education and training;

·  the Government will need to see the full proposal for a youth employment framework, in particular how this relates to those other processes and also to the European Employment Strategy;

·  the Government would oppose any unnecessary duplication, especially where it imposes burdens on Member States; and

·  the description of Member State action should be covered by the open method approach to respect competence and subsidiarity.

1.36 Next, in relation to "A digital agenda for Europe", the Minister says that the Government:

·  welcomes the inclusion of this initiative, with the commitments on broadband being broadly consistent with those set out in Digital Britain[4] and the UK Compact for Jobs and Growth;

·  looks forward to the more comprehensive EU information and communication technologies policy, which the Commission is due to launch in April 2010 — a Government priority for the EU digital agenda is competitive and open information and communication technologies markets (especially in relation to future fast broadband markets), which will help economic recovery in the EU; and

·  is keen for the EU to take measures to stimulate take up of internet and to complete the single market for online consumer and business services to improve choice, security and the growth of innovative businesses.

1.37 In relation to "Resource efficient Europe", the Minister says that:

·  the Government supports the development of such an initiative, which will be an important contribution to ensuring that the EU moves towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient and climate-resilient economy; and

·  by putting in place measures to decouple economic growth from the use of resources and by supporting the transition to a low carbon economy (including the promotion of renewable energy and energy efficiency), the initiative will help to underpin long-term growth and create new 'green' jobs for the future.

1.38 On "An industrial policy for the globalisation era" the Minister says that the Government is broadly supportive of this industrial policy, which is consistent with the Compact for Jobs and Growth and maintains continuity with current EU industrial policy. He continues that the Government's key industrial policy priorities for the EU are:

·  open and competitive markets;

·  the creation of new jobs and development of skills;

·  creating the right framework to help the competitiveness of businesses including small and medium enterprises;

·  encouraging a smooth transition to a low carbon economy; and

·  encouraging innovation and its commercial exploitation and enterprise.

1.39 Turning to "An agenda for new skills and jobs" the Minister says that the Government:

·  supports the New Skills New Jobs agenda and the strategic framework for cooperation in education and training, which have already been launched;

·  will scrutinise any forthcoming proposals for EU action on labour mobility to ensure that they do not impinge on the its ability to manage the UK labour market in a flexible way, by forecasting skills needs, working closely with and being responsive to employers' needs and incorporating migration controls for third country nationals where necessary;

·  will want further information about a second phase of the flexicurity agenda to ensure the Council's agreed principles are respected and the priority remains to tackle labour market segmentation; and

·  supports, in relation to the legislative framework, better regulation and improving implementation of existing standards, especially where the Government believes that UK law sets the standard.

1.40 On the final flagship initiative, "European platform against poverty", the Minister says that the Government:

·  welcomes this and has recently revamped its own stakeholder engagement under the open method to help achieve this;

·  will need to examine specific proposals when brought forward, but what is in the Communication appears consistent with agreed EU priorities and Member States' competence and to fit with current Government priorities; and

·  has a particular interest in developing social innovations.

1.41 Next the Minister discusses the Commission's views on delivery mechanisms, the "Missing links and bottlenecks" section of the Communication, telling us first, in relation to "A single market for the 21st century" that the Government:

·  supports the Commission's aim to defend and deepen the single market and to focus on creating growth and jobs; and

·  welcomes the Commission's re-launch of the single market and believes it is important to build on the achievements of the existing single market.

He adds that the Government's main single market priorities are to:

·  to promote open and competitive markets both internally and externally and resist protectionism;

·  take forward an ambitious agenda for the digital economy and other growth industries of the future;

·  promote low carbon products and services;

·  turn the potential benefits of the Services Directive into a reality; and

·  enforce internal market rules to make the single market work better for small businesses and citizens, including the delivery of smart regulation. 

1.42 On "Investing in growth: cohesion policy, mobilising the EU budget and private finance" the Minister says that the Government:

·  strongly agrees with the Commission's proposal to fully exploit all possibilities to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing EU budget through stronger prioritisation and better alignment of EU expenditure with the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy;

·  set out its position on reform of the EU budget in the Compact for Jobs and Growth paper;

·  notes the Commission's suggestion that the review of the Financial Regulation should be used to develop the potential of financial instruments and awaits the Commission's proposal on this issue;

·  strongly supports better use of the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund in helping small businesses access the finance they need to help them grow; and

·  is particularly pleased that the Commission have adopted its proposal on increasing availability of venture capital funding for early-stage innovative small businesses by enabling the European Investment Fund to access capital markets to raise new capital — the Government believes that €3 billion in new capital would be a good starting point.

1.43 Then, on "Deploying our external policy instruments", the Minister says that the Government:

·  agrees with the Commission on the importance of the external dimension of EU policy to ensure global, open markets — the EU should lead in the fight against protectionism, which threatens to undermine the open trading system and damage EU business;

·  believes that the Doha Round of negotiations should continue to be the first priority for the EU, complemented by assertive market access in ambitious bilateral agreements — the Commission should also have a greater focus on economic (including regulatory) co-operation with the EU's major trading partners; and

·  believes that EU policy should stimulate growth globally, especially the trade and growth of developing countries, which are amongst the worst hit by the economic crisis — the EU should press forward on negotiating full, regional Economic Partnership Agreements that are truly development friendly and on delivering Aid for Trade more effectively.

1.44 In relation to the Commission's suggestions for governance of the Europe 2020 strategy the Minister comments that:

·  the Government supports the proposed alignment of work on the EU's macroeconomic, microeconomic and financial sector policies and the leading role proposed for the European Council;

·  these are important prerequisites for an annual economic summit of the EU's leaders, which would help ensure more coordinated, comprehensive and coherent EU economic policies and greater political buy-in to structural reform; and

·  it will be critical though that, while aligning the reporting on these polices, Europe 2020 respects the separate legal bases on which these operate.

1.45 Finally the Minister tells us that the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, hopes to agree the focus and governance of the strategy, including headline targets at the European Council of 25-26 March 2010.

Conclusion

1.46 It whatever form the proposed Europe 2020 Strategy finally emerges, it will be central to EU policies during the next decade. Therefore we have no hesitation in confirming our earlier intention to recommend the Commission Communication, document (c), for debate in European Committee before the European Council meeting of 25-26 March 2010. We recommend also that the two Commission staff working documents, documents (a) and (b) be taken at that debate too, since much of the Communication derives from the matters laid out in them.

1.47 We suggest that in the debate Members will wish to examine the policy priorities, headline targets and flagship initiatives set out by the Commission, together with its comments on implementation and governance, particularly on those occasional issues where the Government has expressed hesitation or caution.


1   See http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/111877.pdf.  Back

2   (31210) 16016/09: see HC 5-vi (2009-10), chapter 7 (13 January 2010) and HC 5-vii (2009-10), chapter 12 (20 January 2010). Back

3   See http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/329788/compact-jobs-growth.pdf.  Back

4   See http://www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/broadcasting/5631.aspx.  Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 24 March 2010