The Work of the BBC World Service 2008-09 - Foreign Affairs Committee Contents


Written evidence from BBC Monitoring

INTRODUCTION

  During a session on BBC World Service this month the Committee asked for an update on BBC Monitoring. This note aims to briefly recap on the last few years since the FAC last reported on BBC Monitoring in its Annual Report on the FCO.

BBC Monitoring stands ready to provide more material to the Committee on this or any other subject should it so wish. Indeed, if the Committee would like to visit Caversham then you are most cordially invited to do so.

BACKGROUND

  The Committee is already aware from evidence presented previously that in 2004, following a failure by the then lead Stakeholder to agree the recommendations of an OGC led review, and in the light of BBC Monitoring's then parlous financial position, the Cabinet Office commissioned Sir Quentin Thomas to conduct a root and branch review.

This review included all the then Stakeholders (BBC World Service, MoD, the Cabinet Office and the FCO as the lead Stakeholder), the three agencies, and HM Treasury. The review reported in 2005 following that year's General Election.

  The recommendations were accepted and the current BBC Monitoring Stakeholder Regime came into existence in late 2005, enshrined in a Memorandum of Understanding agreed by all the Stakeholders (which now included the three intelligence agencies in addition to the previous Stakeholders, with the Cabinet Office now taking the lead).

  The key points of the new regime were an agreement to Public Expenditure Survey (PES) transfer the previously disaggregated departmental funding into a ring fenced fund administered by the Cabinet Office, which in turn enabled an agreed common set of requirements and priorities to be defined.

  Such wide agreement was never possible under the previous disaggregated funding regimes and was also deemed by the many reviews of BBC Monitoring conducted between 1994-2003 to be impossible to achieve under hard charging models.

  The outcome of the Quentin Thomas Review led to the funding profile shown in row 1 of Table 1 below being agreed by Stakeholders and HM Treasury.

Table 1
2006-07 2007-082008-09 2009-102010-11


1
Stakeholder funding agreed in 2005 £m 24.624.623.4 23.423.4
2Stakeholder funding agreed in CSR '07 £m 25.025.025.0
3Stakeholder funding received £m 24.624.624.6 25.024.8



  Following a Cabinet Office bid on behalf of Stakeholders as part of the CSR '07 process the funding profile should have become that shown in row 2 above. That profile was not realised and, as row 3 above shows, BBC Monitoring has been operating on an effective "flat cash" funding profile since 2006.

  This combined with financial problems associated with the previous successive reviews has meant that it has had to achieve an average of over 7% per annum efficiency savings since 2000-01. This has come at a cost, most notably the loss of 25% of its UK headcount in 2006-07—some 94 posts.

CURRENT POSITION

  Despite the financial stringency demonstrated above BBC Monitoring has used this period of stability to equip itself to meet the evolving open source needs of its Stakeholders and US partner, the Open Source Center.

Thus BBC Monitoring has invested in its international network of bureaus, moving or opening six operations, including, in 2007, in Tbilisi, ahead of the 2008 Russia-Georgia conflict—our coverage of which received much Stakeholder praise.

  The main operations room at our Caversham HQ has been completely rebuilt to allow staff to reap the benefits of more collaborative working using modern digital technology. The strategy of investment in staff and infrastructure will take a further significant step next year when a new technology system to ingest, produce and deliver digital multimedia content comes on stream.

  This will allow BBC Monitoring to deliver a richer range of products to our Stakeholders than ever before along with, crucially, continuing the interchange of content with our US partner whose own open source activities, in what is now a 67 year partnership with BBC Monitoring, contributes a significant amount of unfunded benefit to BBC Monitoring's UK Stakeholders.

  Throughout the period BBC Monitoring has innovated new products and services, for example covering the evolving uses of the Internet. Such thematic services coupled with our unparalleled coverage of countries like Iran, Afghanistan and Somalia have consistently been praised by our Stakeholders and US partner alike, providing often unique insight and context into issues impacting diplomats, journalists, the military and agency staff.

FUTURE

  In understanding that all of the UK public sector faces difficult decisions, BBC Monitoring acknowledges that it is not immune. But at a time of limited financial options, BBC Monitoring believes it is even more important than hitherto to ensure that it can be funded, operate and be governed in a stable manner, so allowing it to maximise its efficiency and effectiveness for the benefit of the UK Stakeholder community and its US partner.

This is even more crucial given the relatively small amount of public funding that BBC Monitoring receives to deliver global coverage spanning some 150 countries in 100 languages, something that only be achieved by the bilateral burden sharing partnership with the US Open Source Center.

  BBC Monitoring has, until now, been able to use its hard won period of stability, albeit with cash flat funding and 7% per annum savings, to maintain its range of products and services, achieve its highest ever scores for customer satisfaction and invest for the future in both its UK and international operations and its technological infrastructure.

22 November 2009





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 5 February 2010