UK Borders Agency: Follow-up on Asylum Cases and E-Borders Programme - Home Affairs Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by the Board of Airline Representatives in the UK (BAR UK)

  BAR UK, with many others in the airline sector, is engaged with e-Borders, primarily through the Air Carriers Connectivity Working Group (ACCWG). Separately, the non-air carriers have their own working groups.

  Right now, it is perceived that e-Borders is like a coin standing upright, but at risk of toppling.

  It is understood that the EU legality test has been passed but that, in practice, great big gaps in data provision could be revealed in respect of EU nationals making intra-EU journeys.

  Furthermore, a similar situation may exist in respect of EU nationals making extra-EU journeys but changing planes within the EU. That national would seem to have the right to decline data being data being provided for the intra-EU sectors, and UKBA would have no right for the other sectors taking place between 3rd party states. A sample journey would be Sydney/Frankfurt/London where there is a change of aircraft and flight number at Frankfurt.

  Reverting to the matter of intra-EU flights, UKBA has been briefed that airline systems are simply not able to provide passenger data according to individual passenger wishes. Systems are either required to have data for ALL passengers or alternatively for NONE at all.

  Looking ahead, and this illustrates how the Home Office is now actively involved with aviation security regimes, is the development of watch lists and no-fly lists.

  Having advised the EU that there was no intention of any Authority to Carry (ATC) scheme, the draft Immigration Bill certainly includes it on its own in Part 14, Para 278.

  ATC was always advised to us that permission would be refused on Immigration grounds only, so would not currently work in the context of counter-terrorism.

  Liaison with the DfT, who have responsibility for aviation security, is crucial. They have advised that the industry will be consulted in respect of the no-fly lists, and they will certainly need to be. There are many sensitive areas that need to clarified and processes developed.

NEXT STEPS

  The UKBA has indicated that it will work with carriers on these matters, and BAR UK looks forward to contributing fully in that dialogue.

IN CONCLUSION

  Please consider this message as a current update only, and that there should be a lot of work in hand to which we will contribute.

  In closing, and this possibly the most salient point of all, the EU probably has to revise its own data provision criteria if a fully-fledged e-Borders system is to be allowed to function successfully.

January 2010





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 7 April 2010